Q58d. Are there areas that require protecting from development?
Support
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37487
Received: 28/07/2021
Respondent: Mr Neil Stone
All of the proposed areas require protecting from development but particularly the areas behind Hockley Primary and Westerings Primary as these schools are already at capacity and would require destruction of agricultural land/woodland. It has been suggested that the land behind Hockley Primary is of low agricultural quality; its strange as wheat has been grown regularly on the site. The access to both of these sites would also involve considerable disturbance to local residents both during construction and therafter
All of the proposed areas require protecting from development but particularly the areas behind Hockley Primary and Westerings Primary as these schools are already at capacity and would require destruction of agricultural land/woodland. It has been suggested that the land behind Hockley Primary is of low agricultural quality; its strange as wheat has been grown regularly on the site. The access to both of these sites would also involve considerable disturbance to local residents both during construction and therafter
Support
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37498
Received: 28/07/2021
Respondent: mr Christopher Arnold
CFS064 needs protecting from development, it is a community asset and is used by many local people for exercise, walking dogs and general recreation. It breaks up the urban sprawl between Folly lane and the rest of Hockley .Whilst we are on it introduce a width restriction down Folly lane to stop HGV's using it, you must have wondered why the drain opposite folly chase keeps breaking, its because HGV's keep mounting the kerb to get round it!
You cant build on Belchamps either, where will the kids go for Beaver/Cub/Scout camp. This is really heartless
CFS064 needs protecting from development, it is a community asset and is used by many local people for exercise, walking dogs and general recreation. It breaks up the urban sprawl between Folly lane and the rest of Hockley .Whilst we are on it introduce a width restriction down Folly lane to stop HGV's using it, you must have wondered why the drain opposite folly chase keeps breaking, its because HGV's keep mounting the kerb to get round it!
You cant build on Belchamps either, where will the kids go for Beaver/Cub/Scout camp. This is really heartless
Support
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37514
Received: 29/07/2021
Respondent: Mr. Steve Jamieson
CFS118, CFS194, CFS064,CFS160, CFS 161 jump to mind, but looking at the plan as a whole if this is put forward it will have a dramatic impact on the Green belt and not only put pressure on an an already overloaded B1013, but also start to erode the areas surrounding Hockley Woods, I am frankly horrified by the prospect of this lovely area becoming another concreate graveyard!
CFS118, CFS194, CFS064,CFS160, CFS 161 jump to mind, but looking at the plan as a whole if this is put forward it will have a dramatic impact on the Green belt and not only put pressure on an an already overloaded B1013, but also start to erode the areas surrounding Hockley Woods, I am frankly horrified by the prospect of this lovely area becoming another concreate graveyard!
Support
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37570
Received: 01/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Ben Miller
Absolutely. The plot of land designated 'CFS024' should absolutely not be considered for development and MUST be kept as it is. This plot of land has been offered for development many times before and each time has been overwhelmingly rejected for many reasons. The most important reasons why this plot of land should NOT be built on is the loss of green belt and the disturbance to the local nature reserve. It is absolutely unthinkable that the countryside be disturbed around this area.
Absolutely. The plot of land designated 'CFS024' should absolutely not be considered for development and MUST be kept as it is. This plot of land has been offered for development many times before and each time has been overwhelmingly rejected for many reasons. The most important reasons why this plot of land should NOT be built on is the loss of green belt and the disturbance to the local nature reserve. It is absolutely unthinkable that the countryside be disturbed around this area.
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37651
Received: 04/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Al Baker
Green belt harm would be catastrophic so close to ancient woodland and SSSI for which i thought development needed to be a certain distance from - No infrastructure, overcrowded roads and poor local services are issues - The harm to the environment and local habitat would be devastating - greed not common sense is driving this - Hockley woods, gusted hall area and bluebell woods will all be ravaged and the beautiful lungs of hawkwell with its wonderful habitat and wildlife destroyed forever - this must not happen
Green belt harm would be catastrophic so close to ancient woodland and SSSI for which i thought development needed to be a certain distance from - No infrastructure, overcrowded roads and poor local services are issues - The harm to the environment and local habitat would be devastating - greed not common sense is driving this - Hockley woods, gusted hall area and bluebell woods will all be ravaged and the beautiful lungs of hawkwell with its wonderful habitat and wildlife destroyed forever - this must not happen
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37653
Received: 04/08/2021
Respondent: Miss Emily Giles
Site reference: CFS264 Address: Land at Greenacres Nursery, Hockley needs protecting from development.
If this site was used it would have a huge impact on agriculture - the nursery is a big part of the community, producing plants for locals.
Traffic on the main road is already a big issue, adding extra houses in close proximity would add to this, which in turn affects pollution and quality of life for locals.
The same can be said for Site reference: CFS064 Address: Land north and east of Folly Chase, Hockley. Additionally, the local school is already over subscribed and green belt
Site reference: CFS264 Address: Land at Greenacres Nursery, Hockley needs protecting from development.
If this site was used it would have a huge impact on agriculture - the nursery is a big part of the community, producing plants for locals.
Traffic on the main road is already a big issue, adding extra houses in close proximity would add to this, which in turn affects pollution and quality of life for locals.
The same can be said for Site reference: CFS064 Address: Land north and east of Folly Chase, Hockley. Additionally, the local school is already over subscribed and green belt
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37668
Received: 04/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Andrew Ward
The land at Pulpits Farm adjacent to the Broadlands must be protected. To lose such a large swath of open green farmland would be devastating for local wildlife and local infrastructure. Greensward Lane is already at capacity and hundreds more vehicles joining it from Pulpits would be chaos. To lose such open space would also adversely and permanently affect the core characteristic of the Broadlands Estate, in that easily accessible footpaths off the estate allow walks into this area which provide a valuable green lung for the area and residents.
The land at Pulpits Farm adjacent to the Broadlands must be protected. To lose such a large swath of open green farmland would be devastating for local wildlife and local infrastructure. Greensward Lane is already at capacity and hundreds more vehicles joining it from Pulpits would be chaos. To lose such open space would also adversely and permanently affect the core characteristic of the Broadlands Estate, in that easily accessible footpaths off the estate allow walks into this area which provide a valuable green lung for the area and residents.
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37703
Received: 06/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Hannah Clarke
CFS024 is joined to the nature reserve, building 39 houses will impact the wildlife massively and the green belt area. No housing should be allowed on this plot.
CFS024 is joined to the nature reserve, building 39 houses will impact the wildlife massively and the green belt area. No housing should be allowed on this plot.
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37723
Received: 07/08/2021
Respondent: N/A
Hockley woods, Potash woods, Large green Farmers fields (which would only be taken by huge investment companies with no interest of the running of the area), Belchamps scout camp & Westerings school are the main ones that spring to mind. All of the small independent sites would be ideal to infill with little or no impact on the running of the current area.
Hockley woods, Potash woods, Large green Farmers fields (which would only be taken by huge investment companies with no interest of the running of the area), Belchamps scout camp & Westerings school are the main ones that spring to mind. All of the small independent sites would be ideal to infill with little or no impact on the running of the current area.
Support
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37799
Received: 09/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Peter Osborne
Re CFS024. Land to the North of Merryfields Avenue.
This land should not be developed. This area has badgers, bats, deer, etc; all using this land to survive and to rear their young, too many green areas are being ripped up just to put money in pockets that are already lined enough without thought whatsoever of the impacts involved.
The people in this area objected a long time ago to this building and each time it was denied so what has changed now?
Re CFS024. Land to the North of Merryfields Avenue.
This land should not be developed. This area has badgers, bats, deer, etc; all using this land to survive and to rear their young, too many green areas are being ripped up just to put money in pockets that are already lined enough without thought whatsoever of the impacts involved.
The people in this area objected a long time ago to this building and each time it was denied so what has changed now?
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37829
Received: 10/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Kevin James
Environment impact.
Access to roads and transport links.
Accident problems from increased traffic at an inadequate road junction.(narrow main road).
Drainage / Flooding of existing properties due to run off from the fields.
Water supply and pressure.
Effect to Wildlife, birds of prey and local species.
Exsisting drainage system inadequate to cope with increased volume.
Areas CFS023 & COL38
COL38 Designated play area for the residents of Malvern road. Footpath access to Beckney Wood.
CFS023 Used as grazing land for horses now overgrown edged to the North by Beckney woods. Ancient woodland. The land has never been chemically fertilised and could be a possible site of the warriors graves from the battle of Assandun (1016) between the Danish and English armies. (disputed, site unconfirmed).
The cost to develop would be astronomical due to a water spring, Blue Clay deposits and water runoff from the fields.
Environment impact to wildlife and fauna, Badgers,foxes and Muntjac deer plus numerous species of birds.
Access to main road, pollution from increased number of vehicles.
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37861
Received: 11/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Richard Warren
Site ref CFS023. Beckney Woods is a hidden gem used for walks,bike rides, horse riding and other physical activity as well as a site of natural beauty and diversity. Any further development near these already small woods would jeopardize it's future and hinder the enjoyment of those who visit it. From a practical point of view, the road access to this area is not suitable for the number of houses proposed.
Site ref CFS023. Beckney Woods is a hidden gem used for walks,bike rides, horse riding and other physical activity as well as a site of natural beauty and diversity. Any further development near these already small woods would jeopardize it's future and hinder the enjoyment of those who visit it. From a practical point of view, the road access to this area is not suitable for the number of houses proposed.
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37868
Received: 11/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Alice Southern
The redevelopment of the site would improve the visual character and appearance of the area
The redevelopment of the site would improve the visual character and appearance of the area
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37872
Received: 11/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Craig Southern
CFS 045 / 191 / 074 - any developments on these areas would have detrimental affect to a very popular walking routes from Hawkwell to Gusted and Hockley woods.
CFS 045 / 191 / 074 - any developments on these areas would have detrimental affect to a very popular walking routes from Hawkwell to Gusted and Hockley woods.
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37901
Received: 13/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Graeme Hook
Limited development in a small number of areas but loss of woodlands not just mature but general hedge row and bushes is unacceptable
Limited development in a small number of areas but loss of woodlands not just mature but general hedge row and bushes is unacceptable
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37988
Received: 17/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Gill Young
Impact on ancient woodland
Loss of community amenities
Loss of wildlife corridor
Loss of footpaths
Unacceptable access and levels of traffic on already congested, narrow roads. Betts Farm cannot take any more traffic
Danger to schoolchildren
The site is totally unsuited to further development
Loss of air quality close to a school
I object strongly to the development site CF064 ear marked for 214 houses. This site would impinge on ancient woodland and would have a very detrimental effect on the current wildlife corridor . Any access roads would create unacceptable levels of traffic and could result in loss of community amenities ( Hockley Community centre). Any access via Osborne Avenue would be very close to Hockley Primary school and the levels of traffic on Osborne Avenue at school times are dangerous - it is already an accident waiting to happen. The roads on the Betts farm estate cannot take any further traffic.
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 37991
Received: 17/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Gill Young
I Object to the proposal CFS045 and CFS064
both sites would lead on to the already congested B1013 causing congestion, air pollution and traffic hazards
Loss of community amenity at Belchamps - should not even be considered
Loss of woodland and green belt
Impact on wildlife corridors
Loss of public footpaths and bridleways
Sever impact on air quality with queuing traffic ( queues now !!)
I Object to the proposal CFS045 and CFS064
both sites would lead on to the already congested B1013 causing congestion, air pollution and traffic hazards
Loss of community amenity at Belchamps - should not even be considered
Loss of woodland and green belt
Impact on wildlife corridors
Loss of public footpaths and bridleways
Sever impact on air quality with queuing traffic ( queues now !!)
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38004
Received: 19/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Natalie Thompson
Building close to beckney woods is damaging to the local wildlife! I can't believe that you as a council are willing to build on all our green belts!
Building close to beckney woods is damaging to the local wildlife! I can't believe that you as a council are willing to build on all our green belts!
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38044
Received: 20/08/2021
Respondent: Miss Jill Bamber
I strongly object to proposed development of the site behind Malvern Road and the cattery. Building on this site would damage Beckney Woods and surrounding areas, including loss of habitat and animals. There would be an increased flood threat to existing houses caused by the run-off from higher ground. Access would be very problematic and disruptive. Would create further congestion on routes that are already very busy and poorly maintained. Local infrastructure will not be able to cope. The lives of existing residents will be severely impacted.
I strongly object to proposed development of the site behind Malvern Road and the cattery. Building on this site would damage Beckney Woods and surrounding areas, including loss of habitat and animals. There would be an increased flood threat to existing houses caused by the run-off from higher ground. Access would be very problematic and disruptive. Would create further congestion on routes that are already very busy and poorly maintained. Local infrastructure will not be able to cope. The lives of existing residents will be severely impacted.
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38047
Received: 21/08/2021
Respondent: 27 Elizabeth Close
The area required further protection for the development are CFS074, CFS045,CFS064, CFS194, CFS169, CFS150 & CFS020. There was already significant build up of the houses near to this area. Why do we need more?
The area required further protection for the development are CFS074, CFS045,CFS064, CFS194, CFS169, CFS150 & CFS020. There was already significant build up of the houses near to this area. Why do we need more?
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38125
Received: 24/08/2021
Respondent: 2nd/3rd Hockley Scout Grouo
Why is Belchamps still included as available for development when RDC have been advised it isn't?
Why is Belchamps still included as available for development when RDC have been advised it isn't?
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38131
Received: 24/08/2021
Respondent: Robert Jones
The area marked col38 was given to the local council by the builder of Malvern Road estate (D L & P Luck ltd) as a play area for the children of the area. As I was the site manager for the builder at the time I know this was part of the planning agreement.
The area marked col38 was given to the local council by the builder of Malvern Road estate (D L & P Luck ltd) as a play area for the children of the area. As I was the site manager for the builder at the time I know this was part of the planning agreement.
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38132
Received: 24/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Simon Lisner
Dear Planning
I with respect strongly object to spatial options development CSF024 Land north of Merryfields Avenue, Hockley. Access to the site is limited. I am deeply concerned about the additional traffic (volume and speed) on Marylands Avenue, both during construction and thereafter. This would be dangerous and risk the safety to local residents young and old. Furthermore, this is greenbelt land with agricultural status and tree protection orders. There would be a detrimental impact on the landscape, the local habitat and the adjacent nature reserve. I am also concerned with access and impact to local schooling.
Dear Planning
I with respect strongly object to spatial options development CSF024 Land north of Merryfields Avenue, Hockley. Access to the site is limited. I am deeply concerned about the additional traffic (volume and speed) on Marylands Avenue, both during construction and thereafter. This would be dangerous and risk the safety to local residents young and old. Furthermore, this is greenbelt land with agricultural status and tree protection orders. There would be a detrimental impact on the landscape, the local habitat and the adjacent nature reserve. I am also concerned with access and impact to local schooling.
Comment
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38141
Received: 25/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs geraldine suskins
Hockley woods, Betts Woods, Bluebell woods, Beckney woods etc and surrounding area should all be protected
Hockley woods, Betts Woods, Bluebell woods, Beckney woods etc and surrounding area should all be protected
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38239
Received: 27/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Mark Trevallion
Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.
Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38244
Received: 27/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Mark Trevallion
Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.
Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38249
Received: 27/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Mark Trevallion
Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.
Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38346
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Kathleen Chantry
All GREENBELT I always thought that greenbelt was put in place to protect the land from any development.
All GREENBELT I always thought that greenbelt was put in place to protect the land from any development.
Object
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38360
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Hallett
CFS5263 and CFS259 - there are two particular areas of concern here. These fields/woodlands are crucial to our wellbeing ... during lockdown, this area became to me a place for mental and physical improvement, and the thought that building may be considered here makes me feel very sad. This area is popular with dog-walkers and walkers generally - a little oasis away from the busy Greensward Road.
CFS5263 and CFS259 - there are two particular areas of concern here. These fields/woodlands are crucial to our wellbeing ... during lockdown, this area became to me a place for mental and physical improvement, and the thought that building may be considered here makes me feel very sad. This area is popular with dog-walkers and walkers generally - a little oasis away from the busy Greensward Road.
Support
New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021
Representation ID: 38379
Received: 02/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Michael Pryor
Any green, open spaces and wooded areas should not be developed and should be protected from any new build. Only exsisting buildings, roads and pavements should be developed.
Any green, open spaces and wooded areas should not be developed and should be protected from any new build. Only exsisting buildings, roads and pavements should be developed.