New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Ended on the 22nd September 2021
If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.

Decorative Image of SquirrelBiodiversity

Relevant Plan Objectives: 19, 22

To protect and enhance biodiversity and geodiversity, national policy requires plans to:identify, map and safeguard components of local wildlife-rich habitats and wider

ecological networks, including the hierarchy of international, national and locally

designated sites of importance for biodiversity, and promote the conservation, restoration and enhancement of priority habitats, ecological networks and the protection and recovery of priority species; and identify and pursue opportunities for securing measurable net gains for biodiversity.

Figure 31: Map Marked with Key Biodiversity Assets

Figure 31: Map of Key Biodiversity Assets

It is important that the plan protects and enhances areas within the District that are of importance for wildlife and biodiversity. Similarly, the plan will need to deliver clear net gains for biodiversity through its strategy, helping to mitigate the impacts of growth on the natural environment and promoting the conservation of important species.

Biodiversity designations exist at a variety of levels, including:

  • International, including Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites
  • National, including ancient woodlands, national nature reserves and Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)
  • Local, including local wildlife and geological sites and local nature reserves

The District is home to a variety of these designations, including many international sites along its coast, an in-land SSSI at Hockley Woods, 14 areas of ancient woodland, 39 local wildlife sites and four local nature reserves. With the exception of local wildlife and geological sites, the designation of these areas is outside of the remit of the plan, but nevertheless their protection through the planning system is mandated by law and in national policy.

The Council is part of the Essex Coast Recreational disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy (RAMS) partnership which is a partnership of 11 local authorities in Essex aimed at appropriately avoiding and mitigating the impacts of new housing development on coastal habitats (through increased recreational disturbance). This partnership has already delivered a strategy and Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) which together aim to deliver a defined mitigation package financed through planning obligations. Over time, it will be important to update this strategy and mitigation package to ensure it takes account of the most up-to-date projections of housing growth across Essex. It is proposed that the plan supports the implementation of the Essex Coast RAMS strategy, and its updates, through an appropriate policy.

We have also prepared a Local Wildlife Sites review to survey our existing local wildlife sites to assess their condition, whilst also considering whether other areas of land are worthy of protection as either a new local wildlife site or local geological site. This review followed a set of criteria as set out in national planning guidance and concluded that 8 new local wildlife sites should be designated, at:

  • Cherry Orchard Country Park
  • Marylands Nature Reserve
  • Buller's Grove
  • Bartonhall Grove
  • Stannetts Creek
  • Barton Hall Creek Seawall
  • Ashingdon Pastures, and
  • Roundhill Pastures

The review also highlighted that one existing site (Doggetts Pond) had deteriorated in quality and no longer meets the standard for designation. In addition to local wildlife sites, the review also concluded that two areas of land were worthy of designation as local geological sites, at:

  • Hullbridge Foreshore
  • Star Lane Pits

Other amendments to the boundaries of existing local wildlife sites were also recommended through the review reflecting up-to-date site conditions.

It is recognised that an Environment Bill is expected later in 2021 which will mandate a new approach to securing net gains for the environment, including biodiversity. In anticipation of this requirement, national policy now requires plans to actively pursue opportunities for biodiversity net gain meaning that over the course of the plan, the natural environment is in a measurably better state than it was beforehand. National guidance suggests that biodiversity net gain from development could be delivered on-site, off-site or a mixture of the two, and could involve measures such as new habitat creation or incorporating wildlife-compatible measures into new developments such as 'swift bricks' or bat boxes. There is therefore now a clearer requirement for plans to set a baseline for biodiversity quality, and make sure that new developments and the plan as a whole delivers net gain in a transparent way, such as using the Biodiversity Metric. It will be important that the new Local Plan demonstrably delivers a net gain, including through the appropriate combination of options below.

OPTIONS - Non-exclusive options for addressing biodiversity through the plan, include:

  1. Ensuring the protection and enhancement of a hierarchy of habitats sites through the plan, including national and international sites, and ensuring new development avoids or mitigates any generated impacts from the plan’s strategy (including through the Habitat Regulations Assessment and Essex Coast RAMS)
  2. Designating for protection areas of land of locally important wildlife or geological value as a local wildlife site or local geological site respectively where they meet the criteria for inclusion, having regard to the Local Wildlife Sites review
  3. Ensuring that the plan delivers net gains for biodiversity alongside new development, including to:
    1. Require new developments to secure biodiversity net gain on-site, such as through new habitat creation or incorporation of wildlife-compatible measures
    2. Requiring new developments to contribute to off-site biodiversity net gain projects, such as habitat creation or restoration at existing wildlife sites
(52) Q29. Do you agree that the plan should designate and protect areas of land of locally important wildlife value as a local wildlife site, having regard to the Local Wildlife Sites review? Are there any other sites that you feel are worthy of protection? [Please state reasoning]
(16) Q30. Do you agree that the plan should designate and protect areas of land of locally important geological value as a local geological site, having regard to the Local Wildlife Sites review? Are there any other sites that you feel are worthy of protection? [Please state reasoning]
(27) Q31. Do you consider net gains for biodiversity are best delivered on-site or off-site? Are there specific locations or projects where net gain projects could be delivered?


If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.
back to top back to top