Q9. Do you agree we should take a sequential approach to flood risk and coastal change in our plan, locating development away from areas at risk of flooding and coastal change wherever possible? How can we best protect current and future communities from

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 77

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37553

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Andrew Allen

Representation Summary:

Data used to project sea level rise and coastal flooding is inadequate. Many sites being promoted/considered are at risk of serious flooding. See here https://coastal.climatecentral.org/map/15/0.7053/51.6182/?theme=sea_level_rise&map_type=coastal_dem_comparison&basemap=hybrid&contiguous=true&elevation_model=best_available&forecast_year=2100&pathway=rcp45&percentile=p50&refresh=true&return_level=return_level_1&slr_model=kopp_2014

Full text:

https://coastal.climatecentral.org/map/15/0.6611/51.6171/?theme=sea_level_rise&map_type=coastal_dem_comparison&basemap=hybrid&contiguous=true&elevation_model=best_available&forecast_year=2060&pathway=rcp45&percentile=p50&refresh=true&return_level=return_level_1&slr_model=kopp_2014

The above link details areas that are deemed to be at risk from sea level rise and coastal flooding from a recognised credible data source. The time frame for this forecast is 2060. Many of the sites currently being promoted/considered for housing development are within these areas.
The Climate Change and Resilient Environment Topic Paper 2021 does not seem to recognise the extent of the potential threat, and neither do the flood risk assessments of each of the sites being promoted/considered. Given that guidance directs that residential properties should have a working lifespan of at least 100 years and that plans to bolster sea and river defences are not included in the evidence base, I do not believe that this has been properly considered and therefore RDC's new local plan will not be fit for purpose until sites included in these flood risk areas are ruled out of future residential development. RDC runs the risk of developing homes which will flood.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37670

Received: 04/08/2021

Respondent: Miss Marie McCarthy

Representation Summary:

Yes. Look at flood defences in Hullbridge.

Full text:

Yes. Look at flood defences in Hullbridge.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37804

Received: 09/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Shirley Page

Representation Summary:

All planning should take into account flood risks. Building should not be allowed on flood plains. Any new developments should ensure that a significant proportion of the land remains permeable. Drainage should be capable of dealing with the increased capacity required due to reduced run-off land and increased rainfall and storms because of climate change.

Full text:

All planning should take into account flood risks. Building should not be allowed on flood plains. Any new developments should ensure that a significant proportion of the land remains permeable. Drainage should be capable of dealing with the increased capacity required due to reduced run-off land and increased rainfall and storms because of climate change.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37888

Received: 12/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Samuel Martin

Representation Summary:

Given the recent reports that we will see sea levels rise it is prudent to have mitigating strategies in plan and key that we don't develop and make areas even more prone to risk. It may be worth investigating scenarios of sea level rise on it's affects on the area and how this could be mitigated via flood/coastal defenses, drainage, etc.

I think it's definitely good to be aware of this and plan new developments in less risky places but it is also important that things are put in place to de-risk the entire area.

Full text:

Given the recent reports that we will see sea levels rise it is prudent to have mitigating strategies in plan and key that we don't develop and make areas even more prone to risk. It may be worth investigating scenarios of sea level rise on it's affects on the area and how this could be mitigated via flood/coastal defenses, drainage, etc.

I think it's definitely good to be aware of this and plan new developments in less risky places but it is also important that things are put in place to de-risk the entire area.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37908

Received: 14/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Claire Sumner

Representation Summary:

The council needs to take into account not only large flood planes but smaller ones too. Some areas that have been high lighted for development are not down as flood planes but most local people know that they regularly flood.

Full text:

The council needs to take into account not only large flood planes but smaller ones too. Some areas that have been high lighted for development are not down as flood planes but most local people know that they regularly flood.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37924

Received: 14/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Bryan Sumner

Representation Summary:

What is the major outlook for the flooding in the area? I have seen it so much around here its not even funny. Watery lane floods every time we have a major rain fall. Some of the housing down in the flood plain area still have issues when the tide is in and its raining.

Full text:

What is the major outlook for the flooding in the area? I have seen it so much around here its not even funny. Watery lane floods every time we have a major rain fall. Some of the housing down in the flood plain area still have issues when the tide is in and its raining.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37958

Received: 16/08/2021

Respondent: mr peter lawrence

Representation Summary:

agree

Full text:

agree

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38066

Received: 22/08/2021

Respondent: Miss tracey gibson

Representation Summary:

If you build in flood risk areas you will increase risk even more! Sewers cannot cope now. Roads cannot cope and more concrete means less ground to absorb water

Full text:

If you build in flood risk areas you will increase risk even more! Sewers cannot cope now. Roads cannot cope and more concrete means less ground to absorb water

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38104

Received: 23/08/2021

Respondent: Craig Cannell

Representation Summary:

locating development away from areas at risk of flooding and coastal change wherever possible is a sensible approach

Full text:

locating development away from areas at risk of flooding and coastal change wherever possible is a sensible approach

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38161

Received: 25/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Theresa Hewison

Representation Summary:

Object

Full text:

Object

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38163

Received: 25/08/2021

Respondent: Miss Jessica Clarke

Representation Summary:

Be disturbed

Full text:

Yes - absolutely. We should not be building on flood planes at all.

They are there for a reason, a natural drainage system and the best option to avoid damage to homes and pressure on emergency services. If buildings were built and damaged them caused to new and older homes due to this, it would create more harm than good and drive people out of their homes. And ultimately making the are undesirable.

I have no ideas to feed back on how to prevent apart from nature drainage systems are by far known to be the most effective and should not

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38306

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: Mr John Whatley

Representation Summary:

Building in flood plains should not be consider at all.

Full text:

Building in flood plains should not be consider at all.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38396

Received: 02/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Vilma Wilson

Representation Summary:

Why do you need to build on land that floods? Communities are best protected by not being bilingual in the first place of flood plains - as done in west Rayleigh

Full text:

Why do you need to build on land that floods? Communities are best protected by not being bilingual in the first place of flood plains - as done in west Rayleigh

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38581

Received: 07/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Wells

Representation Summary:

Yes. Given that climate change is now a fact. Potential flooding is a very important aspect that needs advice from experts in this field otherwise it could have catastrophic repercussions for current or future residents.

Full text:

Yes. Given that climate change is now a fact. Potential flooding is a very important aspect that needs advice from experts in this field otherwise it could have catastrophic repercussions for current or future residents.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38586

Received: 07/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Wendy Davies

Representation Summary:

Yes. Research must be undertaken thoroughly, including use of local knowledge, before houses are built.

Full text:

Yes. Research must be undertaken thoroughly, including use of local knowledge, before houses are built.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38803

Received: 14/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Jeff Higgs

Representation Summary:

Yes, we should not be building new housing in flood zones.
Perhaps these areas could be used for Solar or other green applications?

Full text:

Yes, we should not be building new housing in flood zones.
Perhaps these areas could be used for Solar or other green applications?

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38872

Received: 15/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs kathryn Gilbert

Representation Summary:

Recent building has altered flood risks and recent developments have already been subjected to flooding so are these empty words?

Full text:

Recent building has altered flood risks and recent developments have already been subjected to flooding so are these empty words?

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39029

Received: 19/09/2021

Respondent: Chris Teeder

Representation Summary:

The coastal areas are vital places for maintaining habitat for many endangered species of animals. This includes many species worldwide such as migrating birds that use our wetlands and coastal areas as breeding grounds and essential places to stop and feed during their travel to other places in their migration cycle.

Full text:

The coastal areas are vital places for maintaining habitat for many endangered species of animals. This includes many species worldwide such as migrating birds that use our wetlands and coastal areas as breeding grounds and essential places to stop and feed during their travel to other places in their migration cycle.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39078

Received: 19/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Gill Hind

Representation Summary:

Areas at flood risk account for over 40% of Rochford District Council. Therefore the availability of land for development is severely impacted. Why are we having to take “overflow” from neighbouring councils who have far less risk and far less land that is as precarious to the environmental factors.

To build housing on this type of land would be grossly negligent.

Full text:

Areas at flood risk account for over 40% of Rochford District Council. Therefore the availability of land for development is severely impacted. Why are we having to take “overflow” from neighbouring councils who have far less risk and far less land that is as precarious to the environmental factors.

To build housing on this type of land would be grossly negligent.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39083

Received: 19/09/2021

Respondent: N/A

Representation Summary:

The areas outside of our towns are farming areas and one of the distinct features of our regions. As food supply becomes more challenged we should look at the long term implications of food supply and bio diversity ahead of building in rural areas.

Full text:

The areas outside of our towns are farming areas and one of the distinct features of our regions. As food supply becomes more challenged we should look at the long term implications of food supply and bio diversity ahead of building in rural areas.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39162

Received: 20/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Mike Webb

Representation Summary:

This seems sensible

Full text:

This seems sensible

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39233

Received: 20/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Olivia Reeve

Representation Summary:

The flood risk does however cover most of Wakering and Barling.

Full text:

The flood risk does however cover most of Wakering and Barling.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39259

Received: 21/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs julia cohen

Representation Summary:

The whole of Ashtree court range from the measurements of 9ft - 15ft above sea level.
My neighbour in Mille Fleurs has a storm drain in her garden of which we are also connected and they overflow.
Due to the age of Ashtree house, all our waste and water flows into one drain of which overflows 2-3 times a year from heavy rain of which is mixed with sewage.

Full text:

The whole of Ashtree court range from the measurements of 9ft - 15ft above sea level.
My neighbour in Mille Fleurs has a storm drain in her garden of which we are also connected and they overflow.
Due to the age of Ashtree house, all our waste and water flows into one drain of which overflows 2-3 times a year from heavy rain of which is mixed with sewage.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39283

Received: 21/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Carol Everitt

Representation Summary:

Flood risk is an important issue and consideration is needed. Apart from the actual coastal considerations there must be equal thought given to drainage as housing options are considered.

Full text:

Flood risk is an important issue and consideration is needed. Apart from the actual coastal considerations there must be equal thought given to drainage as housing options are considered.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39310

Received: 21/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Soo Coleman

Representation Summary:

I have experienced the devastation caused by flooding in the Rochford area and would not like to see it return. However climate change is bringing with it many extreme weather conditions, flooding being one of them.

Full text:

I have experienced the devastation caused by flooding in the Rochford area and would not like to see it return. However climate change is bringing with it many extreme weather conditions, flooding being one of them.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39321

Received: 21/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Lynda Edmunds

Representation Summary:

It is important that current sea defences are mAintained well. We also need to ensure that the drainage systems can cope with new areas of development.

Full text:

It is important that current sea defences are mAintained well. We also need to ensure that the drainage systems can cope with new areas of development.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39340

Received: 21/09/2021

Respondent: Mr ian mears

Representation Summary:

It seems sensible to prioritise building away from known areas of flood risk as the likelihood of flooding is only going to increase due to climate change, not reduce. A significant flood event will occur at some point so avoiding large developments is sensible. Preventing flooding elsewhere seems to need a holistic approach covering multiple areas such as: improve existing land drainage (less open empty fields, more trees/hedges etc), unblock all drainage ditches, avoid building more concrete jungles - insist on more open spaces with grass/trees on new build estates.

Full text:

It seems sensible to prioritise building away from known areas of flood risk as the likelihood of flooding is only going to increase due to climate change, not reduce. A significant flood event will occur at some point so avoiding large developments is sensible. Preventing flooding elsewhere seems to need a holistic approach covering multiple areas such as: improve existing land drainage (less open empty fields, more trees/hedges etc), unblock all drainage ditches, avoid building more concrete jungles - insist on more open spaces with grass/trees on new build estates.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39374

Received: 21/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Johnson

Representation Summary:

The above proposal is flawed in saying that development should be located away from flood risk/ coastal change areas only "wherever possible". To protect present and future communities there should be a strict policy of avoiding such areas for housing or commercial development: remaining river flood plain and low lying coastal areas should be left so they can provide for flood mitigation in a future which is predicted to bring more intense rainfall and more sea level rise.

Full text:

The above proposal is flawed in saying that development should be located away from flood risk/ coastal change areas only "wherever possible". To protect present and future communities there should be a strict policy of avoiding such areas for housing or commercial development: remaining river flood plain and low lying coastal areas should be left so they can provide for flood mitigation in a future which is predicted to bring more intense rainfall and more sea level rise.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39400

Received: 21/09/2021

Respondent: Mr oliver Bagnall

Representation Summary:

Yes

Full text:

Yes

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 39482

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Persimmon Homes Essex

Representation Summary:

PHE supports - this is written into policy in the NPPF. Site that PHE is promoting lies within Flood Zone 1.

Full text:

Persimmon Homes strongly recommends that Rochford take the sequential approach to Flood Risk as required by paragraphs 161-162, confirming that new development should be directed to areas with the lowest risk of flooding from any source.

The flood map at Climate Change and Resilient Environments Topic Paper identifies that the four settlements least impacted by Flood Zones are Rayleigh, Hullbridge, Hockley and Ashingdon, and therefore these settlements are sequentially preferable for residential development to meet the Local Plan needs than those settlements that lie within Flood Zones 2 or 3 (such as Great Wakering).

We would also take this opportunity to identify to the Council that the site that Persimmon Homes is promoting (Site CFS087: Land between Western Road and Weir Farm Road, Rayleigh) lies within Flood Zone 1 and is therefore sequentially more preferable than those sites being promoted that lie within Flood Zones 2 and 3.