Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Search representations
Results for Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP search
New searchObject
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SWH4
Representation ID: 19771
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SWH4 is a very large site which would impact on the openness of the green belt.
Option SWH4 is a very large site which would impact on the openness of the green belt.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
South Canewdon 60 dwellings
Representation ID: 19773
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Our clients have an in principle objection to providing an extension to Canewdon, as Canewdon is classified as a tier 3 settlement in the Core Strategy. It is recognised in the SHLAA as having poor access to public services (only 6 services running Monday - Friday) and poor access to shops. From our research it seems that there is only one primary school, 1 GP surgery, 2 public houses, a gold course and a country club. It is unlikely that an additional 60 houses will be able to fund significant improvements to infrastructure or additional amenities.
Our clients have an in principle objection to providing an extension to Canewdon, as Canewdon is classified as a tier 3 settlement in the Core Strategy. It is recognised in the SHLAA as having poor access to public services (only 6 services running Monday - Friday) and poor access to shops. From our research it seems that there is only one primary school, 1 GP surgery, 2 public houses, a gold course and a country club. It is unlikely that an additional 60 houses will be able to fund significant improvements to infrastructure or additional amenities.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SC1
Representation ID: 19774
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SC1 is poorly connected to the existing village. The site is surrounded to the east, south and west by open fields and it would be difficult to provide defensible boundaries along the borders. The development of the site would have a clear impact on the openness of the green belt.
Option SC1 is poorly connected to the existing village. The site is surrounded to the east, south and west by open fields and it would be difficult to provide defensible boundaries along the borders. The development of the site would have a clear impact on the openness of the green belt.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SC2
Representation ID: 19776
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SC2 is very poorly related to the existing village. The site is surrounded by open fields to the north, south and west, and a house and riding school to the east. It is therefore likely to be difficult to create defensible green belt boundaries.
Our clients strongly disagree with the analysis of the site as set out in the discussion and consultation document. Owing to the location and aspect of the land, the site would have a significant impact on the openness of the green belt and the location alone would not necessarily create community cohesion.
Option SC2 is very poorly related to the existing village. The site is surrounded by open fields to the north, south and west, and a house and riding school to the east. It is therefore likely to be difficult to create defensible green belt boundaries.
Our clients strongly disagree with the analysis of the site as set out in the discussion and consultation document. Owing to the location and aspect of the land, the site would have a significant impact on the openness of the green belt and the location alone would not necessarily create community cohesion.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SC3
Representation ID: 19777
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SC3 extends across Scotts Hall Road and occupies the corner of an open field. As such it would be difficult to provide defensible green belt boundaries. This is clearly recognised in the discussion and consultation document.
Option SC3 extends across Scotts Hall Road and occupies the corner of an open field. As such it would be difficult to provide defensible green belt boundaries. This is clearly recognised in the discussion and consultation document.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SC4
Representation ID: 19779
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SC4 is very poorly related to the existing village. The site is surrounded by open fields to the south, east and west, and it would be difficult to create defensible green belt boundaries.
Option SC4 is very poorly related to the existing village. The site is surrounded by open fields to the south, east and west, and it would be difficult to create defensible green belt boundaries.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SEA2
Representation ID: 19780
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SEA2 extends further east than the current built up area of Rochford. At this point this site therefore encroaches into the green belt. It will be difficult to create defensible green belt boundaries to the east, south, and part of the north of the site where the site adjoins open fields.
Option SEA2 extends further east than the current built up area of Rochford. At this point this site therefore encroaches into the green belt. It will be difficult to create defensible green belt boundaries to the east, south, and part of the north of the site where the site adjoins open fields.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SEA3
Representation ID: 19781
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SEA3, as with Option SEA2, the site extends further east than the current built up area of Rochford. At this point, this site therefore encroaches into the green belt. It will be difficult to create defensible green belt boundaries to the east, south, and part of the north of the site where the site adjoins open fields.
Option SEA3, as with Option SEA2, the site extends further east than the current built up area of Rochford. At this point, this site therefore encroaches into the green belt. It will be difficult to create defensible green belt boundaries to the east, south, and part of the north of the site where the site adjoins open fields.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option WGW3
Representation ID: 19784
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option WGW3 extends from the south of the Star Lane Brickworks and will reduce the openness between Great Wakering and Southend. The proposed site only adjoins the built up area on part of its northern boundary and it is open in aspect to the east, south and west. By virtue of its location it will have a significant impact on the landscape and the openness green belt.
The site also adjoins Star Lane Pits to the north and the ecological impact of siting development close to this Local Wildlife Site should be carefully considered.
Option WGW3 extends from the south of the Star Lane Brickworks and will reduce the openness between Great Wakering and Southend. The proposed site only adjoins the built up area on part of its northern boundary and it is open in aspect to the east, south and west. By virtue of its location it will have a significant impact on the landscape and the openness green belt.
The site also adjoins Star Lane Pits to the north. This is a Local Wildlife Site identified in the Rochford District Local Wildlife Sites Review (2007) which forms part of the Local Development Framework evidence base. The ecological impact of siting development close to this Local Wildlife Site should be carefully considered.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option WGW4
Representation ID: 19791
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option WGW4 extends from the south of the Star Lane Brickworks to the north of Poynters Lane and will result in the coalescence of Great Wakering and Southend, as recognised in the consultation document.
The proposed site only adjoins a built up area on part of its northern boundary and it is open in aspect to the east, south and west. It will have a significant impact on the landscape and the openness green belt.
The site also adjoins Star Lane Pits. The ecological impact of siting development close to this Local Wildlife Site should be carefully considered.
Option WGW4 extends from the south of the Star Lane Brickworks to the north of Poynters Lane and will result in the coalescence of Great Wakering and Southend, as recognised in the consultation document. This is contrary to PPG2 which states that one of the key purposes of the green belt is to prevent neighbouring towns from merging into one another.
The proposed site only adjoins a built up area on part of its northern boundary and it is open in aspect to the east, south and west. By virtue of its location it will have a significant impact on the landscape and the openness green belt.
The site also adjoins Star Lane Pits to the north. This is a Local Wildlife Site identified in the Rochford District Local Wildlife Sites Review (2007) which forms part of the Local Development Framework evidence base. The ecological impact of siting development close to this Local Wildlife Site should be carefully considered.
