Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Search representations
Results for Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP search
New searchObject
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SH1
Representation ID: 19757
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SH1 is a large site which if developed would significantly contribute to the coalescence of Hockley and Hawkwell.
Option SH1 is a large site which if developed would significantly contribute to the coalescence of Hockley and Hawkwell.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SH2
Representation ID: 19759
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SH2, by virtue of its location, would significantly contribute to the coalescence of Hockley and Hawkwell.
Option SH2, by virtue of its location, would significantly contribute to the coalescence of Hockley and Hawkwell.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SH3
Representation ID: 19761
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SH3 would lead to a loss of sense of openness between Hockley and Hawkwell.
Option SH3 would lead to a loss of sense of openness between Hockley and Hawkwell.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SH4
Representation ID: 19762
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SH4 by virtue of its location, would significantly contribute to the coalescence of Hockley and Hawkwell.
Option SH4 by virtue of its location, would significantly contribute to the coalescence of Hockley and Hawkwell.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option EA2
Representation ID: 19763
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option EA2 provides separation between the eastern edge of Rochford and development along Brays Lane. Therefore, if developed, it would lead to this existing development becoming part of Rochford. It will also be difficult to provide a defensible green belt boundary to the north of the site.
Option EA2 provides separation between the eastern edge of Rochford and development along Brays Lane. Therefore, if developed, it would lead to this existing development becoming part of Rochford. It will also be difficult to provide a defensible green belt boundary to the north of the site.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option EA3
Representation ID: 19764
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option EA3 is as Option EA2, but also incorporates land to the south of Brays Lane. The northern site provides separation between the eastern edge of Rochford and development along Brays Lane. Therefore, if developed, it would lead to this existing development becoming part of Rochford. It will also be difficult to provide a defensible green belt boundary to the north of the site.
Option EA3 is as Option EA2, but also incorporates land to the south of Brays Lane. The northern site provides separation between the eastern edge of Rochford and development along Brays Lane. Therefore, if developed, it would lead to this existing development becoming part of Rochford. It will also be difficult to provide a defensible green belt boundary to the north of the site.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
South West Hullbridge 500 dwellings (250 between 2015 and 2021, and 250 post 2021)
Representation ID: 19767
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Our clients have an in principle objection to providing an extension to Hullbridge, as Hullbridge is classified as a tier 2 settlement in the Core Strategy and has limited amenities.
Our clients have an in principle objection to providing an extension to Hullbridge, as Hullbridge is classified as a tier 2 settlement in the Core Strategy and has limited amenities.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SWH1
Representation ID: 19768
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SWH1 is a very large site which would impact on the openness of the green belt.
Option SWH1 is a very large site which would impact on the openness of the green belt.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SWH2
Representation ID: 19769
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SWH2 is a very large site which would impact on the openness of the green belt.
Option SWH2 is a very large site which would impact on the openness of the green belt.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Option SWH3
Representation ID: 19770
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option SWH3 is a very large site which would impact on the openness of the green belt The close proximity to the SSSI should also be an important consideration as recognised in the SHLAA.
Option SWH3 is a very large site which would impact on the openness of the green belt The close proximity to the SSSI should also be an important consideration as recognised in the SHLAA.
