Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Search representations

Results for Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP search

New search New search

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Stambridge Mills

Representation ID: 19794

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP

Agent: Firstplan

Representation Summary:

Stambridge Mills lies within Flood Zone 3a and therefore conflicts with PPS25. On its own, Stambridge Mills is divorced from Rochford and would represent an isolated development.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

South of Great Wakering

Representation ID: 19802

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP

Agent: Firstplan

Representation Summary:

In our client's view, Tithe Park is the most sustainable option when considered against the other alternatives (Options E19 - E22). Although we would anticipate the employment land being located to the west of the Tithe Park site, adjoining Southend and not to the north as indicated in the Allocations DPD.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option E19

Representation ID: 19808

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP

Agent: Firstplan

Representation Summary:

The site only adjoins a built up area on part of its northern boundary and it is open in aspect to the east, south and west.

It will have a significant impact on the landscape and the openness green belt and it will be difficult to provide defensible green belt boundaries, particularly to the south and east.

The site is situated in close proximity to Star Lane Pits and the ecological impact of siting employment uses close to this Local Wildlife Site should be carefully considered.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option E20

Representation ID: 19811

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP

Agent: Firstplan

Representation Summary:

Option E20 will result in the coalescence of Great Wakering and Southend. The proposed site only adjoins a built up area on part of its northern boundary and it is open in aspect to the east, south and west. By virtue of its location it will have a significant impact on the landscape and the openness green belt.

The site also adjoins Star Lane Pits to the north and the ecological impact of siting employment uses close to this Local Wildlife Site should be carefully considered.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option E21

Representation ID: 19812

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP

Agent: Firstplan

Representation Summary:

Given that the site is surrounded by open land to the west, south and east it is likely to have a significant impact on the landscape and the openness in the green belt.

The site also adjoins Star Lane Pits to the north and the ecological impact of siting employment uses close to this Local Wildlife Site should be carefully considered.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option E22

Representation ID: 19814

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP

Agent: Firstplan

Representation Summary:

Option E22 extends south from theof Star Lane Pits and Star Lane Brickworks.

Given that the site is surrounded by open land to the south and east it is likely to have a significant impact on the landscape and the openness of the green belt.

The site adjoins Star Lane Pits to the north. This is a Local Wildlife Site identified in the Rochford District Local Wildlife Sites Review (2007) which forms part of the Local Development Framework evidence base. The ecological impact of siting employment uses close to this Local Wildlife Site should be carefully considered.

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option E23

Representation ID: 19820

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP

Agent: Firstplan

Representation Summary:

Options E23 and E24 (Tithe Park) are the most sustainable options when considered against the other alternatives (Options E19 - E22).

The development of Tithe Park for employment purposes will have a lesser impact on the landscape and openness of the green belt than the other options around Great Wakering because Tithe Park adjoins Southend to the south and west, and Poynters Lane to the north. Defensible green belt boundaries can be provided whereas the other potential sites are more open in aspect and this development could therefore have a greater impact on the green belt.

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Option E24

Representation ID: 19822

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP

Agent: Firstplan

Representation Summary:

Options E23 and E24 (Tithe Park) are the most sustainable options when considered against the other alternatives (Options E19 - E22). The development of Tithe Park for employment purposes will have a lesser impact on the landscape and openness of the green belt than the other options around Great Wakering because Tithe Park adjoins Southend to the south and west, and Poynters Lane to the north. Defensible green belt boundaries can be provided whereas the other potential sites are more open in aspect and this development could therefore have a greater impact on the green belt.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.