Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

Search representations

Results for Hockley Residents Association search

New search New search

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

Policy 3 - Promoting better movement

Representation ID: 28348

Received: 11/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Addtiional cycle parking proposed but nothing on cycle access. The narrow railway bridge is a serious obstacle to cycling in Hockley

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

Policy 3 - Promoting better movement

Representation ID: 28349

Received: 11/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Report proposes reduced parking levels (below standard). Developers are unlikely to invest in a supermarket with inadequate parking.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

Policy 4 - Increasing the availability of housing

Representation ID: 28350

Received: 11/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Report proposes extra housing "north of rail line" by consolidating car parking in Eldon Way but inadequate parking proposed.
No Traffic Assessment (TA) to assess impact on traffic having to go through railway bridge bottleneck.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

Policy 4 - Increasing the availability of housing

Representation ID: 28351

Received: 11/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Insufficient parking levels result in Capacity Study being undermined.and inaccurate.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

Policy 5 - Protecting jobs

Representation ID: 28352

Received: 11/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Capacity study results skewed by inadequate parking space

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

Policy 6 - Improving retail choice for local people

Representation ID: 28353

Received: 11/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

RDC have misrepresented the Retail & Leisure Study 2008 (RLS) and exaggerated the potential in Hockley misleading residents. The RLS actually states that Hockley has limited potential. This needs to be factored into the proposals.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

Policy 6 - Improving retail choice for local people

Representation ID: 28354

Received: 11/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

No rational for stated requirement for a new 3,000 sq m supermarket, 6 times the current size. Two new supermarkets have opened since the HAAP started and not even mentioned!

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

Policy 7 - Ensuring a healthy centre

Representation ID: 28355

Received: 04/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Additional pubs and cafes proposed but insufficient policing levels to police area (particularly in evening). We have 1 Pc and 2 PCSOs to 30,000 residents.

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

5.3 - Community infrastructure

Representation ID: 28356

Received: 11/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This report allows for £2-300K for Spa Roundabout. The council states it has not assessed the changes but the same proposal in the Core Strategy allowed up to £2m. What has changed to justify this reduction?

The council's own expert reported that there is restricted space for improvements. Why have council reached a different conclusion and what evidence to support their conclusion?

Object

Hockley Area Action Plan Submission Document

1.2 - Working with our community

Representation ID: 28357

Received: 11/12/2012

Respondent: Hockley Residents Association

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The council have implemented a two-tier process which discriminates against Hockley and tried to cover it up.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.