Option GT4

There is no mains drainage in the area and the previous occupants used the woods at the rear of the site as their toilet which caused a health hazard. Local residents spent about four years objecting to people moving caravans onto green belt land when we are restricted to council policies regarding extending our properties. Rochford council spent a lot of taxpayers money getting them removed and clearing up the site. This part of Plumberow Avenue is unadopted, unmade and maintained by local residents and we already get too much through traffic carving it up.

You say in your site description that it's size may not render it "Fit for purpose".There is no "May not"about it.It is wholly inappropriate.Mobile homes placed there would ruin the ambience of the area ,Destroy houses values and cost a totally disproportionate amount to provide necessary infrastructure.{Presumably at the tax payers expense} It beggars
belief that you are even considering this proposal.
As I have recieved no direct notification of this proposal can you please explain who has issued the directive that you have to have these sites and why you can't ignore it.

I object as the road is unmade and maintained at the expense of the residents. The road is already being used as a cut through to Lower Road and cannot withold any further traffic. There is no drainage at the site. Much money has been spent already to get the gypsies off this sites as there were problems with the residents when they were here before.

Plumberow Avenue is maintained at the hard work (labour) and personal expense of residents. It is already being used as a cut through to Lower Road and cannot take further traffic. No mains drainage on site would incurr a great expense for the site and other residents. Money has been spent already to get the gypsies removed due to problems previously. Is the council going to foot the bill for the expense of the road, drainage and problems that may incurr? Having gypsies in such a sought after area will also devalue our properties.

Core Strategy - Allocations Development Plan Document
I/we wish to register the following objections and comments regarding the above document:
Housing Allocation
As clearly previously stated in the Hockley Parish Plan, large scale housing developments in Hockley, are not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There are no proposed solutions to traffic issues on the already congested main artery roads between Rayleigh and Rochford, i.e. the B1013 and Rectory Road, which are narrow and winding, and include the narrow railway bridge in Hawkwell
Bus services (Nos. 7 and 8) are inadequate in the area to support the additional housing
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues (congestion and parking) caused by the 'school runs' in the morning and evening, which would be considerably worse than the current problems due to the additional children

Proposed 50 additional dwellings in West Hockley
The development of any additional housing in the area is not supported for the following reasons:
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already busy roads around Church Road, Folly Lane and Fountain Lane, which are dangerous, narrow, winding and used by many horseriders.
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues at Hockley primary school caused by 'school runs' due to the additional children
However, if development is enforced, then Option WH2 (mushroom farm - brownfield site) is preferred as it avoids the loss of greenbelt and open spaces.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estate (TC7/9)
The relocation of Industrial Units to the proposed Airport Business Park to provide space for redevelopment and additional housing in the Town Centre is not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already congested main artery road between Rayleigh and Hockley, i.e. the B1013.
There is no public transport (trains or buses) to support the Airport Business Park
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, seven out of every eight residents in Hockley opposes major redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, if redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is enforced, the recommendations for change include a youth centre, a healthcare centre, a community centre and leisure facilities, with only 1% support for housing.
It contradicts RDC's own Retail & Leisure Study 2008 proposal to reclassify Hockley as a District centre - Hockley should be kept as a Village!


Proposed Gypsy Sites (GT4/5)
These options are not supported. As stated in the Core Strategy, gypsy sites are best suited to the west of the district due to transport links and access to services.
It is essential that any gypsy site developments are matched by appropriate infrastructure such as water / gas / electric supply, sewerage, access for refuse / recycling collection, access to healthcare and schools.
Hockley already has a small site off Lower Road. and the development of additional gypsy sites in the Hockley area either at Plumberow Avenue or off Lower Road is not supported for the following reasons:
Loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
Hockley is already highly developed with relatively less open spaces than other regions in the district.
Access to transport links and utility services (water, gas, electric, sewerage) is poor in both proposed Hockley sites

Town Centre Boundaries
Option TC7 (the current town centre boundaries remain) is recommended.
The exclusion of the shops to the west of Hockley (Option TC8) is not supported - regeneration (not expansion) of this row of shops / businesses must be encouraged without detriment to the village feel.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates (Option TC8), whether remaining as industrial / leisure or redeveloped for other purposes, should not be included in the town centre boundaries.
District Centre versus Town Centre
Option TC10 should be adopted to redesignate Hockley as a district centre. This would protect the area from expansion and preserve the village feel that was requested by residents in both the Hockley Parish Plan and in the recent resident survey in October 2009. This must not however be allowed to prevent opportunities for minor regeneration and improvements.
The Retail & Leisure Study in 2008 indicated maintaining and developing existing strengths rather than retail expansion. Expansion of the town centre to include Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is not promoted within the Retail & Leisure Study and would detract the focus away from maintaining and improving the current town centre.

Primary Shopping Area

Option TC16 (existing primary and secondary shopping frontages) should remain the Primary Shopping Area and encourage minor regeneration and improvements of the secondary frontages. Option TC15 is too restrictive and does not fairly support those shops / businesses away from the 'centre'.

Core Strategy - Allocations Development Plan Document
I/we wish to register the following objections and comments regarding the above document:
Housing Allocation
As clearly previously stated in the Hockley Parish Plan, large scale housing developments in Hockley, are not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There are no proposed solutions to traffic issues on the already congested main artery roads between Rayleigh and Rochford, i.e. the B1013 and Rectory Road, which are narrow and winding, and include the narrow railway bridge in Hawkwell
Bus services (Nos. 7 and 8) are inadequate in the area to support the additional housing
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues (congestion and parking) caused by the 'school runs' in the morning and evening, which would be considerably worse than the current problems due to the additional children

Proposed 50 additional dwellings in West Hockley
The development of any additional housing in the area is not supported for the following reasons:
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already busy roads around Church Road, Folly Lane and Fountain Lane, which are dangerous, narrow, winding and used by many horseriders.
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues at Hockley primary school caused by 'school runs' due to the additional children
However, if development is enforced, then Option WH2 (mushroom farm - brownfield site) is preferred as it avoids the loss of greenbelt and open spaces.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estate (TC7/9)
The relocation of Industrial Units to the proposed Airport Business Park to provide space for redevelopment and additional housing in the Town Centre is not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already congested main artery road between Rayleigh and Hockley, i.e. the B1013.
There is no public transport (trains or buses) to support the Airport Business Park
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, seven out of every eight residents in Hockley opposes major redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, if redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is enforced, the recommendations for change include a youth centre, a healthcare centre, a community centre and leisure facilities, with only 1% support for housing.
It contradicts RDC's own Retail & Leisure Study 2008 proposal to reclassify Hockley as a District centre - Hockley should be kept as a Village!


Proposed Gypsy Sites (GT4/5)
These options are not supported. As stated in the Core Strategy, gypsy sites are best suited to the west of the district due to transport links and access to services.
It is essential that any gypsy site developments are matched by appropriate infrastructure such as water / gas / electric supply, sewerage, access for refuse / recycling collection, access to healthcare and schools.
Hockley already has a small site off Lower Road. and the development of additional gypsy sites in the Hockley area either at Plumberow Avenue or off Lower Road is not supported for the following reasons:
Loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
Hockley is already highly developed with relatively less open spaces than other regions in the district.
Access to transport links and utility services (water, gas, electric, sewerage) is poor in both proposed Hockley sites

Town Centre Boundaries
Option TC7 (the current town centre boundaries remain) is recommended.
The exclusion of the shops to the west of Hockley (Option TC8) is not supported - regeneration (not expansion) of this row of shops / businesses must be encouraged without detriment to the village feel.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates (Option TC8), whether remaining as industrial / leisure or redeveloped for other purposes, should not be included in the town centre boundaries.
District Centre versus Town Centre
Option TC10 should be adopted to redesignate Hockley as a district centre. This would protect the area from expansion and preserve the village feel that was requested by residents in both the Hockley Parish Plan and in the recent resident survey in October 2009. This must not however be allowed to prevent opportunities for minor regeneration and improvements.
The Retail & Leisure Study in 2008 indicated maintaining and developing existing strengths rather than retail expansion. Expansion of the town centre to include Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is not promoted within the Retail & Leisure Study and would detract the focus away from maintaining and improving the current town centre.

Primary Shopping Area

Option TC16 (existing primary and secondary shopping frontages) should remain the Primary Shopping Area and encourage minor regeneration and improvements of the secondary frontages. Option TC15 is too restrictive and does not fairly support those shops / businesses away from the 'centre'.

I strongly object to this site to be used as gypsy and traveller dwelling.

Core Strategy - Allocations Development Plan Document
I/we wish to register the following objections and comments regarding the above document:
Housing Allocation
As clearly previously stated in the Hockley Parish Plan, large scale housing developments in Hockley, are not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There are no proposed solutions to traffic issues on the already congested main artery roads between Rayleigh and Rochford, i.e. the B1013 and Rectory Road, which are narrow and winding, and include the narrow railway bridge in Hawkwell
Bus services (Nos. 7 and 8) are inadequate in the area to support the additional housing
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues (congestion and parking) caused by the 'school runs' in the morning and evening, which would be considerably worse than the current problems due to the additional children

Proposed 50 additional dwellings in West Hockley
The development of any additional housing in the area is not supported for the following reasons:
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already busy roads around Church Road, Folly Lane and Fountain Lane, which are dangerous, narrow, winding and used by many horseriders.
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues at Hockley primary school caused by 'school runs' due to the additional children
However, if development is enforced, then Option WH2 (mushroom farm - brownfield site) is preferred as it avoids the loss of greenbelt and open spaces.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estate (TC7/9)
The relocation of Industrial Units to the proposed Airport Business Park to provide space for redevelopment and additional housing in the Town Centre is not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already congested main artery road between Rayleigh and Hockley, i.e. the B1013.
There is no public transport (trains or buses) to support the Airport Business Park
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, seven out of every eight residents in Hockley opposes major redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, if redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is enforced, the recommendations for change include a youth centre, a healthcare centre, a community centre and leisure facilities, with only 1% support for housing.
It contradicts RDC's own Retail & Leisure Study 2008 proposal to reclassify Hockley as a District centre - Hockley should be kept as a Village!


Proposed Gypsy Sites (GT4/5)
These options are not supported. As stated in the Core Strategy, gypsy sites are best suited to the west of the district due to transport links and access to services.
It is essential that any gypsy site developments are matched by appropriate infrastructure such as water / gas / electric supply, sewerage, access for refuse / recycling collection, access to healthcare and schools.
Hockley already has a small site off Lower Road. and the development of additional gypsy sites in the Hockley area either at Plumberow Avenue or off Lower Road is not supported for the following reasons:
Loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
Hockley is already highly developed with relatively less open spaces than other regions in the district.
Access to transport links and utility services (water, gas, electric, sewerage) is poor in both proposed Hockley sites

Town Centre Boundaries
Option TC7 (the current town centre boundaries remain) is recommended.
The exclusion of the shops to the west of Hockley (Option TC8) is not supported - regeneration (not expansion) of this row of shops / businesses must be encouraged without detriment to the village feel.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates (Option TC8), whether remaining as industrial / leisure or redeveloped for other purposes, should not be included in the town centre boundaries.
District Centre versus Town Centre
Option TC10 should be adopted to redesignate Hockley as a district centre. This would protect the area from expansion and preserve the village feel that was requested by residents in both the Hockley Parish Plan and in the recent resident survey in October 2009. This must not however be allowed to prevent opportunities for minor regeneration and improvements.
The Retail & Leisure Study in 2008 indicated maintaining and developing existing strengths rather than retail expansion. Expansion of the town centre to include Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is not promoted within the Retail & Leisure Study and would detract the focus away from maintaining and improving the current town centre.

Primary Shopping Area

Option TC16 (existing primary and secondary shopping frontages) should remain the Primary Shopping Area and encourage minor regeneration and improvements of the secondary frontages. Option TC15 is too restrictive and does not fairly support those shops / businesses away from the 'centre'.

Core Strategy - Allocations Development Plan Document
I/we wish to register the following objections and comments regarding the above document:
Housing Allocation
As clearly previously stated in the Hockley Parish Plan, large scale housing developments in Hockley, are not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There are no proposed solutions to traffic issues on the already congested main artery roads between Rayleigh and Rochford, i.e. the B1013 and Rectory Road, which are narrow and winding, and include the narrow railway bridge in Hawkwell
Bus services (Nos. 7 and 8) are inadequate in the area to support the additional housing
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues (congestion and parking) caused by the 'school runs' in the morning and evening, which would be considerably worse than the current problems due to the additional children

Proposed 50 additional dwellings in West Hockley
The development of any additional housing in the area is not supported for the following reasons:
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already busy roads around Church Road, Folly Lane and Fountain Lane, which are dangerous, narrow, winding and used by many horseriders.
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues at Hockley primary school caused by 'school runs' due to the additional children
However, if development is enforced, then Option WH2 (mushroom farm - brownfield site) is preferred as it avoids the loss of greenbelt and open spaces.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estate (TC7/9)
The relocation of Industrial Units to the proposed Airport Business Park to provide space for redevelopment and additional housing in the Town Centre is not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already congested main artery road between Rayleigh and Hockley, i.e. the B1013.
There is no public transport (trains or buses) to support the Airport Business Park
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, seven out of every eight residents in Hockley opposes major redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, if redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is enforced, the recommendations for change include a youth centre, a healthcare centre, a community centre and leisure facilities, with only 1% support for housing.
It contradicts RDC's own Retail & Leisure Study 2008 proposal to reclassify Hockley as a District centre - Hockley should be kept as a Village!


Proposed Gypsy Sites (GT4/5)
These options are not supported. As stated in the Core Strategy, gypsy sites are best suited to the west of the district due to transport links and access to services.
It is essential that any gypsy site developments are matched by appropriate infrastructure such as water / gas / electric supply, sewerage, access for refuse / recycling collection, access to healthcare and schools.
Hockley already has a small site off Lower Road. and the development of additional gypsy sites in the Hockley area either at Plumberow Avenue or off Lower Road is not supported for the following reasons:
Loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
Hockley is already highly developed with relatively less open spaces than other regions in the district.
Access to transport links and utility services (water, gas, electric, sewerage) is poor in both proposed Hockley sites

Town Centre Boundaries
Option TC7 (the current town centre boundaries remain) is recommended.
The exclusion of the shops to the west of Hockley (Option TC8) is not supported - regeneration (not expansion) of this row of shops / businesses must be encouraged without detriment to the village feel.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates (Option TC8), whether remaining as industrial / leisure or redeveloped for other purposes, should not be included in the town centre boundaries.
District Centre versus Town Centre
Option TC10 should be adopted to redesignate Hockley as a district centre. This would protect the area from expansion and preserve the village feel that was requested by residents in both the Hockley Parish Plan and in the recent resident survey in October 2009. This must not however be allowed to prevent opportunities for minor regeneration and improvements.
The Retail & Leisure Study in 2008 indicated maintaining and developing existing strengths rather than retail expansion. Expansion of the town centre to include Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is not promoted within the Retail & Leisure Study and would detract the focus away from maintaining and improving the current town centre.

Primary Shopping Area

Option TC16 (existing primary and secondary shopping frontages) should remain the Primary Shopping Area and encourage minor regeneration and improvements of the secondary frontages. Option TC15 is too restrictive and does not fairly support those shops / businesses away from the 'centre'.

This site is far too small. If agreed It will just open the flood gates for other travellers to come to the area and pitch where they can. It is a private unadopted road and outside number 285 the road was made up by local residents in Beckney(including my family) for our access only and not as a through road.Travellers trucks were always a problem when a family was there before. There must be a farmer with a few acres for sale where things can be properly managed for these families who do not wish to be mainstream

We write to confirm our objections to the proposed gypsy site at 285 Plumberow Avenue Hockley.

We reside next door to the proposed development and were also resident when the previous gypsy family decided to try and settle a green belt piece of land. This is a piece of land that does not have a dwelling on it and therefore is not liable to ordinary development due to green belt policies.

The gypsy family moved in overnight with their caravan. That may not have been such a problem if there were adequate facilities to the site. However, due to the animals that they kept and also the lack of sanitation (there is not main drainage or a pit) we had an infestation of rats and also regularly had the water board attending due to sewage flowing down the road. Human detritus has since been found in the woods at the back of the proposed site.

As this was an illegal encampment the Council to our knowledge spent £1,000's fighting the Gypsy Council in order to have them removed. Since then money has been spent in order to restore the site back to its natural state rather than being left as a tarmac shell.

This site is not suitable due to its location; the lack of facilities including mains sanitation; it is an unmade road; it is of an inadequate size to hold more than one family.

It is suggested by the council that the site is suitable due to it having good access to the highway network. This is not correct. This is half way down an unmade road that is already becoming a 'rat run' and a cut through to Lower Road. This road is maintained by the residents, are the council going to further develop the road thus creating further traffic problems due to the 'rat run'. At this time residents choose not to fully maintain the road and have purchased suitable vehicles in order to maintain the status quo re the amount of traffic.

Placing 1-2 families on this very small site is more likely to create a feeling of isolation rather than cohesion as the Council seek to do.

I'm not sure about the mains sewerage drainage and how this will be addressed, costs involved compared to the small benefit it gives. I don't think this is value for money and there must be more suitable sites. The road is not maintained by the council and we live with this - is the council going to address this now just for the Gypsy site again with considerable cost but something the residents have lived with and have accepted - why does that change now? I believe this is green belt land so how all of a sudden is this convertable? The green belt idea surely is to prevent this sort of thing and I feel double standards here. Clearly, rising crime is a concern of mine too given the Crays Hill development experience of friends of mine - this would also affect house prices for sure - this would need to be policed more and again at a cost ot the tax payer. How is the local infrastructure going to cope with more people in the viallage when doctors and dentists etc. are already stretched? Overall not a good idea at all.

My main objection to this site going ahead is the increased traffic it will cause, in a road that is already busy with vehicles, commuters and children from the local primary/senior school. We also object to the changes in the landscape and possibility of increased pollution. There are no pavements or street lighting in the suggested area which is unsafe and will lead to more building work.

We strongly object to the proposed siting of the gypsy site. It will have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area . There is no mains sewerage, traffic congestion would increase and to site it on green belt land between residential properties seems wholly inappropiate. Property values would also fall.
Paul and Gail Martin

I'm a great believer in "live and let live"but this option is totally unsupportand for the following reasons:
Inapproriate use of Green belt land.
Inapproriate use of land in an established residential area.
No main drainage or sewage treatment
Children play area close by.
Detrimental effect on established residential area.
Reduction in property value.
Close proximity to family recreational facilities ie cycling,walking,horse riding

How on earth can the site have "suitable access to highways network" when nothing other than a 4 x 4 get through this unmade , unadopted road?
P.S will RDC pay for the reduction in my property's value?

I/we wish to register the following objections and comments regarding the above document:
Housing Allocation
As clearly previously stated in the Hockley Parish Plan, large scale housing developments in Hockley, are not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There are no proposed solutions to traffic issues on the already congested main artery roads between Rayleigh and Rochford, i.e. the B1013 and Rectory Road, which are narrow and winding, and include the narrow railway bridge in Hawkwell
Bus services (Nos. 7 and 8) are inadequate in the area to support the additional housing
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues (congestion and parking) caused by the 'school runs' in the morning and evening, which would be considerably worse than the current problems due to the additional children

Proposed 50 additional dwellings in West Hockley
The development of any additional housing in the area is not supported for the following reasons:
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already busy roads around Church Road, Folly Lane and Fountain Lane, which are dangerous, narrow, winding and used by many horseriders.
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues at Hockley primary school caused by 'school runs' due to the additional children
However, if development is enforced, then Option WH2 (mushroom farm - brownfield site) is preferred as it avoids the loss of greenbelt and open spaces.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estate (TC7/9)
The relocation of Industrial Units to the proposed Airport Business Park to provide space for redevelopment and additional housing in the Town Centre is not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already congested main artery road between Rayleigh and Hockley, i.e. the B1013.
There is no public transport (trains or buses) to support the Airport Business Park
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, seven out of every eight residents in Hockley opposes major redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, if redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is enforced, the recommendations for change include a youth centre, a healthcare centre, a community centre and leisure facilities, with only 1% support for housing.
It contradicts RDC's own Retail & Leisure Study 2008 proposal to reclassify Hockley as a District centre - Hockley should be kept as a Village!


Proposed Gypsy Sites (GT4/5)
These options are not supported. As stated in the Core Strategy, gypsy sites are best suited to the west of the district due to transport links and access to services.
It is essential that any gypsy site developments are matched by appropriate infrastructure such as water / gas / electric supply, sewerage, access for refuse / recycling collection, access to healthcare and schools.
Hockley already has a small site off Lower Road. and the development of additional gypsy sites in the Hockley area either at Plumberow Avenue or off Lower Road is not supported for the following reasons:
Loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
Hockley is already highly developed with relatively less open spaces than other regions in the district.
Access to transport links and utility services (water, gas, electric, sewerage) is poor in both proposed Hockley sites

Town Centre Boundaries
Option TC7 (the current town centre boundaries remain) is recommended.
The exclusion of the shops to the west of Hockley (Option TC8) is not supported - regeneration (not expansion) of this row of shops / businesses must be encouraged without detriment to the village feel.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates (Option TC8), whether remaining as industrial / leisure or redeveloped for other purposes, should not be included in the town centre boundaries.
District Centre versus Town Centre
Option TC10 should be adopted to redesignate Hockley as a district centre. This would protect the area from expansion and preserve the village feel that was requested by residents in both the Hockley Parish Plan and in the recent resident survey in October 2009. This must not however be allowed to prevent opportunities for minor regeneration and improvements.
The Retail & Leisure Study in 2008 indicated maintaining and developing existing strengths rather than retail expansion. Expansion of the town centre to include Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is not promoted within the Retail & Leisure Study and would detract the focus away from maintaining and improving the current town centre.

Primary Shopping Area

Option TC16 (existing primary and secondary shopping frontages) should remain the Primary Shopping Area and encourage minor regeneration and improvements of the secondary frontages. Option TC15 is too restrictive and does not fairly support those shops / businesses away from the 'centre'.

This site should have never been an option in the first place and it should not be considered at all.

i totally oject to this proposal for the following reasons:
Inapproriate use of Green belt land.
Inapproriate use of land in an established residential area.
No main drainage or sewage treatment
Children play area close by.
Detrimental effect on established residential area.
Reduction in property value.
Close proximity to family recreational facilities ie cycling,walking,horse riding

The enviromental impact of creating a suitable domain will be extremely high, along with the sustainabillity and maintenance to this area.

I object, this area has already had a major housing development in recent years causing highway issues on this already overloaded road. This particular part of the road is unmade and it is up to individual residents to maintain, also there is no street lighting. There is also no sewerage treatment to this land, who will be responsible for this and at what cost?

I object strongly to this proposal. The following 'fair and honest' reasons I feel should be carefully considered as they represent why I feel 'wholeheartedly' why this site really is unsuitbale for this purpose.

1) This is greenbelt land and as such I would expect that to be respected. If a householder or developer was looking to develop on greenbelt land they would not obtain permission...so I expect the same to apply to councils! There are other proposals in the list that are not destrying the sanctity of the Green Belt

2) I understand there is no main sewage plumbing on that site currently. This would be expensive to add and I for one do not feel we the tax payers should shell out for this if there are other sites with sewage pipe availability already there. I understand there have been sewage issues and environmental problems before when a previous family were resident there so this would be a real concern for me living in the area

3) The road is unmade currently. If you make it up it will be expensive and would encourage loads of traffic from the station as a cut through to Hullbridge and other areas. The road network is unsuitable and the Plumberow road is already busy with commuters and people driving too fast. The road is unsuitable for the extra traffic and I am concerned about the speed and cut through right next to the park where my children currently play!

4) The site is too small......it also holds the water being at the bottom of the hill and would be like a bog! Too many homes cramped on this space and all in marsh like conditions would be a mess, an eyesore and would definately have a direct impact on our house prices. We pay a high band council tax for the pleasure of living around green belt land, so I would feel the council would be responsible for a severe reduction in my property value for which I would take legal council on. (a similar disaster happened on green belt land as I understand it for Crays Hill)

From looking at the available research, these are the reasons I strongly object to the Traveller's site being Hockley:
1) Instant drop in house prices. The area will be seen as undesirable. Crays Hill and Basilson are perfect examples of this.
2) Plumberow School is already over subscribed and an influx of new children, all arriving at the same time will only make matters worse.
3) Security Issues.
4) The roads in Hockley and the surrounding routes are already busy, the infrastructure is just not there to support yet more "housing".
5) A site will have serious impact on the landscape. Not to mention that despite "planning regulations" these site appear to double in size overnight, and no one seems to be able to do anything about it.

This site is on the furthest most point of all services and is totally unsuitable and should not be considered .

Site too small to accommodate all the required pitches. Located in an unmade road which I feel is inappropriate.

Core Strategy - Allocations Development Plan
We would like to make the following comments regarding the Plan:-
- It is clear that large scale housing developments in Hockley are not going to work because Hockley is only a village and we are not able to support large numbers of extra houses. We do not have the infrastructure, our roads are already congested with through trafic and suprisingly large commericial vehicles
- We believe Hockley already has a gypsy site and the development of an additional site would encroach even further on countryside/greeneblt. The site proposed for Plumberow Avenue is very close to Plumberow Mount.
- PLEASE, please, please can we have a regeneration of our existing village centre. Development of Eldon Way would detract. At the moment the village looks weary but could be so much better!
We have filled in a resident survey. But we do not see the results of the survey reflected in the Plan at all.

Core Strategy - Allocations Development Plan
We would like to make the following comments regarding the Plan:-
- It is clear that large scale housing developments in Hockley are not going to work because Hockley is only a village and we are not able to support large numbers of extra houses. We do not have the infrastructure, our roads are already congested with through traffic and surprisingly large commercial vehicles
- We believe Hockley already has a gypsy site and the development of an additional site would encroach even further on countryside/greenbelt. The site proposed for Plumberow Avenue is very close to Plumberow Mount.
- PLEASE, please, please can we have a regeneration of our existing village centre. Development of Eldon Way would detract. At the moment the village looks weary but could be so much better!
We have filled in a resident survey. But we do not see the results of the survey reflected in the Plan at all.

At a public meeting in Hockley the residents overwhelmingly rejected this due to accessibility.

Core Strategy - Allocations Development Plan Document
I/we wish to register the following objections and comments regarding the above document:
Housing Allocation
As clearly previously stated in the Hockley Parish Plan, large scale housing developments in Hockley, are not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There are no proposed solutions to traffic issues on the already congested main artery roads between Rayleigh and Rochford, i.e. the B1013 and Rectory Road, which are narrow and winding, and include the narrow railway bridge in Hawkwell
Bus services (Nos. 7 and 8) are inadequate in the area to support the additional housing
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues (congestion and parking) caused by the 'school runs' in the morning and evening, which would be considerably worse than the current problems due to the additional children

Proposed 50 additional dwellings in West Hockley
The development of any additional housing in the area is not supported for the following reasons:
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already busy roads around Church Road, Folly Lane and Fountain Lane, which are dangerous, narrow, winding and used by many horseriders.
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues at Hockley primary school caused by 'school runs' due to the additional children
However, if development is enforced, then Option WH2 (mushroom farm - brownfield site) is preferred as it avoids the loss of greenbelt and open spaces.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estate (TC7/9)
The relocation of Industrial Units to the proposed Airport Business Park to provide space for redevelopment and additional housing in the Town Centre is not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already congested main artery road between Rayleigh and Hockley, i.e. the B1013.
There is no public transport (trains or buses) to support the Airport Business Park
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, seven out of every eight residents in Hockley opposes major redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, if redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is enforced, the recommendations for change include a youth centre, a healthcare centre, a community centre and leisure facilities, with only 1% support for housing.
It contradicts RDC's own Retail & Leisure Study 2008 proposal to reclassify Hockley as a District centre - Hockley should be kept as a Village!


Proposed Gypsy Sites (GT4/5)
These options are not supported. As stated in the Core Strategy, gypsy sites are best suited to the west of the district due to transport links and access to services.
It is essential that any gypsy site developments are matched by appropriate infrastructure such as water / gas / electric supply, sewerage, access for refuse / recycling collection, access to healthcare and schools.
Hockley already has a small site off Lower Road. and the development of additional gypsy sites in the Hockley area either at Plumberow Avenue or off Lower Road is not supported for the following reasons:
Loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
Hockley is already highly developed with relatively less open spaces than other regions in the district.
Access to transport links and utility services (water, gas, electric, sewerage) is poor in both proposed Hockley sites

Town Centre Boundaries
Option TC7 (the current town centre boundaries remain) is recommended.
The exclusion of the shops to the west of Hockley (Option TC8) is not supported - regeneration (not expansion) of this row of shops / businesses must be encouraged without detriment to the village feel.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates (Option TC8), whether remaining as industrial / leisure or redeveloped for other purposes, should not be included in the town centre boundaries.
District Centre versus Town Centre
Option TC10 should be adopted to redesignate Hockley as a district centre. This would protect the area from expansion and preserve the village feel that was requested by residents in both the Hockley Parish Plan and in the recent resident survey in October 2009. This must not however be allowed to prevent opportunities for minor regeneration and improvements.
The Retail & Leisure Study in 2008 indicated maintaining and developing existing strengths rather than retail expansion. Expansion of the town centre to include Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is not promoted within the Retail & Leisure Study and would detract the focus away from maintaining and improving the current town centre.

Primary Shopping Area

Option TC16 (existing primary and secondary shopping frontages) should remain the Primary Shopping Area and encourage minor regeneration and improvements of the secondary frontages. Option TC15 is too restrictive and does not fairly support those shops / businesses away from the 'centre'.

Core Strategy - Allocations Development Plan Document
I/we wish to register the following objections and comments regarding the above document:
Housing Allocation
As clearly previously stated in the Hockley Parish Plan, large scale housing developments in Hockley, are not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There are no proposed solutions to traffic issues on the already congested main artery roads between Rayleigh and Rochford, i.e. the B1013 and Rectory Road, which are narrow and winding, and include the narrow railway bridge in Hawkwell
Bus services (Nos. 7 and 8) are inadequate in the area to support the additional housing
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues (congestion and parking) caused by the 'school runs' in the morning and evening, which would be considerably worse than the current problems due to the additional children

Proposed 50 additional dwellings in West Hockley
The development of any additional housing in the area is not supported for the following reasons:
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already busy roads around Church Road, Folly Lane and Fountain Lane, which are dangerous, narrow, winding and used by many horseriders.
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues at Hockley primary school caused by 'school runs' due to the additional children
However, if development is enforced, then Option WH2 (mushroom farm - brownfield site) is preferred as it avoids the loss of greenbelt and open spaces.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estate (TC7/9)
The relocation of Industrial Units to the proposed Airport Business Park to provide space for redevelopment and additional housing in the Town Centre is not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already congested main artery road between Rayleigh and Hockley, i.e. the B1013.
There is no public transport (trains or buses) to support the Airport Business Park
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, seven out of every eight residents in Hockley opposes major redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, if redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is enforced, the recommendations for change include a youth centre, a healthcare centre, a community centre and leisure facilities, with only 1% support for housing.
It contradicts RDC's own Retail & Leisure Study 2008 proposal to reclassify Hockley as a District centre - Hockley should be kept as a Village!


Proposed Gypsy Sites (GT4/5)
These options are not supported. As stated in the Core Strategy, gypsy sites are best suited to the west of the district due to transport links and access to services.
It is essential that any gypsy site developments are matched by appropriate infrastructure such as water / gas / electric supply, sewerage, access for refuse / recycling collection, access to healthcare and schools.
Hockley already has a small site off Lower Road. and the development of additional gypsy sites in the Hockley area either at Plumberow Avenue or off Lower Road is not supported for the following reasons:
Loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
Hockley is already highly developed with relatively less open spaces than other regions in the district.
Access to transport links and utility services (water, gas, electric, sewerage) is poor in both proposed Hockley sites

Town Centre Boundaries
Option TC7 (the current town centre boundaries remain) is recommended.
The exclusion of the shops to the west of Hockley (Option TC8) is not supported - regeneration (not expansion) of this row of shops / businesses must be encouraged without detriment to the village feel.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates (Option TC8), whether remaining as industrial / leisure or redeveloped for other purposes, should not be included in the town centre boundaries.
District Centre versus Town Centre
Option TC10 should be adopted to redesignate Hockley as a district centre. This would protect the area from expansion and preserve the village feel that was requested by residents in both the Hockley Parish Plan and in the recent resident survey in October 2009. This must not however be allowed to prevent opportunities for minor regeneration and improvements.
The Retail & Leisure Study in 2008 indicated maintaining and developing existing strengths rather than retail expansion. Expansion of the town centre to include Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is not promoted within the Retail & Leisure Study and would detract the focus away from maintaining and improving the current town centre.

Primary Shopping Area

Option TC16 (existing primary and secondary shopping frontages) should remain the Primary Shopping Area and encourage minor regeneration and improvements of the secondary frontages. Option TC15 is too restrictive and does not fairly support those shops / businesses away from the 'centre'.

Core Strategy - Allocations Development Plan Document
I/we wish to register the following objections and comments regarding the above document:
Housing Allocation
As clearly previously stated in the Hockley Parish Plan, large scale housing developments in Hockley, are not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There are no proposed solutions to traffic issues on the already congested main artery roads between Rayleigh and Rochford, i.e. the B1013 and Rectory Road, which are narrow and winding, and include the narrow railway bridge in Hawkwell
Bus services (Nos. 7 and 8) are inadequate in the area to support the additional housing
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues (congestion and parking) caused by the 'school runs' in the morning and evening, which would be considerably worse than the current problems due to the additional children

Proposed 50 additional dwellings in West Hockley
The development of any additional housing in the area is not supported for the following reasons:
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already busy roads around Church Road, Folly Lane and Fountain Lane, which are dangerous, narrow, winding and used by many horseriders.
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues at Hockley primary school caused by 'school runs' due to the additional children
However, if development is enforced, then Option WH2 (mushroom farm - brownfield site) is preferred as it avoids the loss of greenbelt and open spaces.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estate (TC7/9)
The relocation of Industrial Units to the proposed Airport Business Park to provide space for redevelopment and additional housing in the Town Centre is not supported for the following reasons:
There should be no large housing estates due to lack of infrastructure
There is no proposed solution to traffic issues on the already congested main artery road between Rayleigh and Hockley, i.e. the B1013.
There is no public transport (trains or buses) to support the Airport Business Park
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, seven out of every eight residents in Hockley opposes major redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates
Based on the results of a resident survey in October 2009, if redevelopment of Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is enforced, the recommendations for change include a youth centre, a healthcare centre, a community centre and leisure facilities, with only 1% support for housing.
It contradicts RDC's own Retail & Leisure Study 2008 proposal to reclassify Hockley as a District centre - Hockley should be kept as a Village!


Proposed Gypsy Sites (GT4/5)
These options are not supported. As stated in the Core Strategy, gypsy sites are best suited to the west of the district due to transport links and access to services.
It is essential that any gypsy site developments are matched by appropriate infrastructure such as water / gas / electric supply, sewerage, access for refuse / recycling collection, access to healthcare and schools.
Hockley already has a small site off Lower Road. and the development of additional gypsy sites in the Hockley area either at Plumberow Avenue or off Lower Road is not supported for the following reasons:
Loss of countryside, greenbelt and open spaces in and around Hockley
Hockley is already highly developed with relatively less open spaces than other regions in the district.
Access to transport links and utility services (water, gas, electric, sewerage) is poor in both proposed Hockley sites

Town Centre Boundaries
Option TC7 (the current town centre boundaries remain) is recommended.
The exclusion of the shops to the west of Hockley (Option TC8) is not supported - regeneration (not expansion) of this row of shops / businesses must be encouraged without detriment to the village feel.
Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates (Option TC8), whether remaining as industrial / leisure or redeveloped for other purposes, should not be included in the town centre boundaries.
District Centre versus Town Centre
Option TC10 should be adopted to redesignate Hockley as a district centre. This would protect the area from expansion and preserve the village feel that was requested by residents in both the Hockley Parish Plan and in the recent resident survey in October 2009. This must not however be allowed to prevent opportunities for minor regeneration and improvements.
The Retail & Leisure Study in 2008 indicated maintaining and developing existing strengths rather than retail expansion. Expansion of the town centre to include Eldon Way / Foundry Industrial Estates is not promoted within the Retail & Leisure Study and would detract the focus away from maintaining and improving the current town centre.

Primary Shopping Area

Option TC16 (existing primary and secondary shopping frontages) should remain the Primary Shopping Area and encourage minor regeneration and improvements of the secondary frontages. Option TC15 is too restrictive and does not fairly support those shops / businesses away from the 'centre'.