Option GT3

Showing comments and forms 241 to 250 of 250

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 24967

Received: 04/05/2010

Respondent: Mr R Lovett

Representation Summary:

Objection to the housing at North of London Road and Traveller Sites.
See paper copy for details.

Full text:

Objection to the housing at North of London Road and Traveller Sites.
See paper copy for details.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25037

Received: 04/05/2010

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Burden

Representation Summary:

Objection to proposed gypsy and traveller land allocation in Rayleigh between Rawreth Lane and London Road.

Full text:

Objection to proposed housing and gypsy and traveller land allocation in Rayleigh between Rawreth Lane and London Road.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25114

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: E Summerton

Representation Summary:

I would like to register my strong opposition to proposal GT3.

Full text:

I would like to register my strong opposition to proposals GT3, NLR1, NLR2, NLR3, NLR4 and NLR5.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25130

Received: 04/05/2010

Respondent: A H Hand

Representation Summary:

Objection to the gypsy and traveller sites

Full text:

Objection to Gypsy and Traveller site GT3. See paper copy.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25170

Received: 04/05/2010

Respondent: D R W Crisp

Representation Summary:

Objection to the housing at North of London Road and Traveller Sites.
See paper copy for details.

Full text:

Objection to the housing at North of London Road and Traveller Sites.
See paper copy for details.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25172

Received: 04/05/2010

Respondent: J E Crisp

Representation Summary:

Objection to the housing at North of London Road and Traveller Sites.
See paper copy for details.

Full text:

Objection to the housing at North of London Road and Traveller Sites.
See paper copy for details.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25301

Received: 28/04/2010

Respondent: mrs Susan Tucker

Representation Summary:

Objection to Gypsy and traveller sites GT3

Full text:

Objection to Gypsy and traveller sites GT3. See paper copy.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25315

Received: 27/04/2010

Respondent: Mrs B Chester

Representation Summary:

Objection to North of London Road, Rayleigh 550 dwellings NLR1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and Gypsy and Traveller Sites GT1, 2, 3 and 7.

Full text:

Objection to North of London Road, Rayleigh 550 dwellings NLR1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and Gypsy and Traveller Sites GT1, 2, 3 and 7. See paper copy.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25331

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Weir

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Option GT3 is the most suitable as it is closer to shops and schools

Full text:

Suggest a new development in West Rayleigh to accommodate Rochford's housing allocation should be provided in a new village to take advantage from the highway network of A127, A130 and A1245 where all the infrastructure can be provided in a phased manner without compromising existing settlements.

Various comments received, for further details see paper copy.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25370

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Mr N Fitzgerald

Representation Summary:

I am also concerned with the possibility the traveling community will be placed near by.

Full text:

I am a resident living with my young family. I would like to make representations to the proposed building of new homes on green belt land in the area, in particular on the grounds of Rayleigh Sport and Social Club on London Road. I am also concerned with the possibility the traveling community will be placed near by. My suggestion would be to increase their present area and legalise their site.

I am aware of the need for affordable housing however not if it takes the place of green belt land or negatively impacts the areas social or community activity or spirit.