Option GT2
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17361
Received: 20/03/2010
Respondent: Mr Ron Sadler
This area is large enough and suitablly far enough away from existing residential dwellings.
This area is large enough and suitablly far enough away from existing residential dwellings.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17477
Received: 22/03/2010
Respondent: Mr Russell Payne
Develope this site rather than finding new sites.
Develope this site rather than finding new sites.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17559
Received: 28/03/2010
Respondent: Mrs Lynda Ivison
Given the existing site appears to be well managed, it makes sense to extend the facilities for the increased provision of pitches.
Given the existing site appears to be well managed, it makes sense to extend the facilities for the increased provision of pitches.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17587
Received: 28/03/2010
Respondent: Mr Ian Richardson
Looks ideal
Looks ideal
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17606
Received: 29/03/2010
Respondent: Mrs Joan Mitchell
This site looks more than suitable for the needs that the Council is required to fill.
This site looks more than suitable for the needs that the Council is required to fill.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17746
Received: 05/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Barbara Oliver-Mayho
This site is already large enough, I believe it is better to leave it as it is and make sites elsewhere.
This site is already large enough, I believe it is better to leave it as it is and make sites elsewhere.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17786
Received: 06/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Scott Davies
This site looks to meet all the requirements that the Council has listed. It has good access to the road network and is close to other developments.
This site looks to meet all the requirements that the Council has listed. It has good access to the road network and is close to other developments.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17893
Received: 12/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Mark Sibley
This should be the site where they are put, it makes sense to keep them together.
This should be the site where they are put, it makes sense to keep them together.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17900
Received: 12/04/2010
Respondent: ms Kim Harris
If there is already a gypsy site here it makes financial sense to expand this rather than build a completely new one in another area.
If there is already a gypsy site here it makes financial sense to expand this rather than build a completely new one in another area.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18305
Received: 22/04/2010
Respondent: mr stephen honour
strongly object to any expansion of this illegal site. smaller sites spread throughout the the district would be the only acceptable alternative.
strongly object to any expansion of this illegal site. smaller sites spread throughout the the district would be the only acceptable alternative.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18331
Received: 24/04/2010
Respondent: mrs c cleverley
I strongly object to this site to be used as a larger travellers site. We have a lovely community and it is not appropriate to house travellers within the centre of a town. There are enough sites that travellers can use without making more of them in a residential area. Rayleigh is a historic market town and should be kept this way. There are other small sites across the district that could be used instead
I strongly object to this site to be used as a larger travellers site. We have a lovely community and it is not appropriate to house travellers within the centre of a town. There are enough sites that travellers can use without making more of them in a residential area. Rayleigh is a historic market town and should be kept this way. There are other small sites across the district that could be used instead
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18335
Received: 25/04/2010
Respondent: mr a cleverley
Being a local resident I strongly object to the expansion of this site. There must be more suitable areas in rural locations for these proposed pitches away from residential housing.
Being a local resident I strongly object to the expansion of this site. There must be more suitable areas in rural locations for these proposed pitches away from residential housing.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18339
Received: 25/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Georgina Russell
Object to gypsy sites in Rayleigh
Object to gypsy sites in Rayleigh
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18344
Received: 25/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Martyn Wilkins
Of the proposed traveller sites to the west of Rayleigh, options GT1 and GT2 appear to be least worst. I am not aware of any problems from the current occupants of this site. Provided the expansion is well managed and further expansion is not allowed, then I would have no objections.
Of the proposed traveller sites to the west of Rayleigh, options GT1 and GT2 appear to be least worst. I am not aware of any problems from the current occupants of this site. Provided the expansion is well managed and further expansion is not allowed, then I would have no objections.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18360
Received: 25/04/2010
Respondent: Judith Stevens
Given the relatively small number of additional pitches required, it surely makes financial sense to develop this existing site.
Given the relatively small number of additional pitches required, it surely makes financial sense to develop this existing site.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18365
Received: 25/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Ann Rawlinson
I support the legalisation of the current site with minimal additional pitches. However this site should not have to take the full allocation of pitches required for the whole district.
I support the legalisation of the current site with minimal additional pitches. However this site should not have to take the full allocation of pitches required for the whole district.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18389
Received: 25/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Jane Leadbeater
Rayleigh is an up and coming area. We are trying to raise levels in the area and bring down crime. There could be an increase in crime, the roads around Rayleigh are congested anyway and do not need more traffic added to the roads. Schools are at capacity, do not need more children in schools.
Rayleigh is an up and coming area. We are trying to raise levels in the area and bring down crime. There could be an increase in crime, the roads around Rayleigh are congested anyway and do not need more traffic added to the roads. Schools are at capacity, do not need more children in schools.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18423
Received: 26/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Leslie Sampson
This site is a short distance away from GT1 and if GT1 can not be extended to fulfill the requirement in this area of 18 pitches then GT2 would be the next best option to provide the additional pitches to make up the total in the area for gypsies (i.e. persons of a nomadic habit of life) that is required. The good access to major highways are an important factor and the visibility of the sites would help to ensure that they continue to be maintained and used in a responsible manner.
This site is a short distance away from GT1 and if GT1 can not be extended to fulfill the requirement in this area of 18 pitches then GT2 would be the next best option to provide the additional pitches to make up the total in the area for gypsies (i.e. persons of a nomadic habit of life) that is required. The good access to major highways are an important factor and the visibility of the sites would help to ensure that they continue to be maintained and used in a responsible manner.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18456
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Stuart Kingston
A very short distance from GT1 , this site could be included if needed to gain any extra pitches not available at GT1 . This site being with good access and service is currently unused scrub land not wood land .
A very short distance from GT1 , this site could be included if needed to gain any extra pitches not available at GT1 . This site being with good access and service is currently unused scrub land not wood land .
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18474
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Ken Stanton
Of the 3 options, assuming Rochford is forced by legislation and not by soft Political Correctness to have these sites, GT1 is the better.
However, if the current pitches can be legalised why does West Rayleigh have to be burdened with the remainder of the allocation required??
Can other parts of the Rochford District not take their share?
Of the 3 options, assuming Rochford is forced by legislation and not by soft Political Correctness to have these sites, GT1 is the better.
However, if the current pitches can be legalised why does West Rayleigh have to be burdened with the remainder of the allocation required??
Can other parts of the Rochford District not take their share?
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18576
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Stephen Rayner
The size and location of this site would ideally support the needs of the Traveller community, and support community cohesion.
The size and location of this site would ideally support the needs of the Traveller community, and support community cohesion.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18581
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Miss Nicola Rawlinson
I support the legalisation of the existing site with some additional pitches, but no site in Rayleigh should be expected to take the full allocation of pitches required by the District.
I support the legalisation of the existing site with some additional pitches, but no site in Rayleigh should be expected to take the full allocation of pitches required by the District.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18583
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Neil Euesden
I do not believe that the local infrastructure will support this type of development, or that RDC has the necessary expertise to manage such a development. I oppose any buildings on green belt or agricultural land.
I do not believe that the local infrastructure will support this type of development, or that RDC has the necessary expertise to manage such a development. I oppose any buildings on green belt or agricultural land.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18799
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Lyn Hopkins
I object most strongly . To legalise this present site and then to increase it to accommodate all the required pitches is completely irresponsible and dangerous. .
As GT1 this site is adjacent to the very busy A1245 100metres from traffic lights at the junction with Rawreth Lane. Traffic accelerating from the lights has to brake suddenly to avoid vehicles accessing the present site and to increase the capacity of the site would increase the danger at this junction.
Sites should be spread throughout thedistrict to afford access to all facilities.
I object most strongly . To legalise this present site and then to increase it to accommodate all the required pitches is completely irresponsible and dangerous. .
As GT1 this site is adjacent to the very busy A1245 100metres from traffic lights at the junction with Rawreth Lane. Traffic accelerating from the lights has to brake suddenly to avoid vehicles accessing the present site and to increase the capacity of the site would increase the danger at this junction.
Sites should be spread throughout thedistrict to afford access to all facilities.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19007
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Robert Mepham
There are other more appropriate sites for this activity in other parts of the District. Access and amenities are poor leading on to a very busy road
There are other more appropriate sites for this activity in other parts of the District. Access and amenities are poor leading on to a very busy road
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19037
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Phil Abbott
This is the common sense site. Spend a little money on extending an already established site with few objections, rather than alienating a whole area of London Road and spending vast amounts more in the process. This site shares similar plus points as site GT6, but without being too big. If was good enough for travellers up to now, how could it not be good enough in future with a small extension to space and facilities?
This is the common sense site. Spend a little money on extending an already established site with few objections, rather than alienating a whole area of London Road and spending vast amounts more in the process. This site shares similar plus points as site GT6, but without being too big. If was good enough for travellers up to now, how could it not be good enough in future with a small extension to space and facilities?
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19082
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Hayley Bloomfield
The expansion of GT1 to accomodate more travllers thus forming GT2 is totally unacceptable, This site has been illegally used for a number of years, to legalise it now and add to it would just add to the opinion of many Travellers that they are above planning law and that eventually District Councils will give in. This site is adjacent to the A1245 with extremely dangerous access. There are better sites which have been proposed that would allow Traveller cohesion, This is Greenbelt land and should be returned to its former use, a field.
The expansion of GT1 to accomodate more travllers thus forming GT2 is totally unacceptable, This site has been illegally used for a number of years, to legalise it now and add to it would just add to the opinion of many Travellers that they are above planning law and that eventually District Councils will give in. This site is adjacent to the A1245 with extremely dangerous access. There are better sites which have been proposed that would allow Traveller cohesion, This is Greenbelt land and should be returned to its former use, a field.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19097
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Mr David Hopper
This illegal traveller site should in no way be extended into further green belt/agricultural land
This illegal traveller site should in no way be extended into further green belt/agricultural land
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19178
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Paul Orrock
This option is probably the best one since it provides the allocation in one lump, without losing much farmland. It would allow them to build a community feeling and provide good services and amenities for their children without adversely impacting more permanent residents. There is development nearby so they are not too far out on their own.
This option is probably the best one since it provides the allocation in one lump, without losing much farmland. It would allow them to build a community feeling and provide good services and amenities for their children without adversely impacting more permanent residents. There is development nearby so they are not too far out on their own.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19319
Received: 19/04/2010
Respondent: Julie Hillis
I also srongly oppose traveller site options GT1, GT2, GT3 and GT7.
Please note that I strongly object to the council's housing options NLR1, NLR2, NLR3, NLR4 & NLR5 (but especially LNR1) because they will;
cause an unnecessary loss of agricultural land,
will increase traffic,
will over load the local services such as schools and doctors surgeries,
will create a green belt boundary that can't be defended in future
and encourage a merging between Rawreth and Rayleigh.
I also srongly oppose traveller site options GT1, GT2, GT3 and GT7.
Please note my comments.