Option EA2
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17442
Received: 22/03/2010
Respondent: Mr David Dare
Same as EA1
Same as EA1
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18395
Received: 25/04/2010
Respondent: MR GRAHAM STROUD
Similar to EA1
Similar to EA1
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18453
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Ashingdon Parish Council
If housing development were approved in or near Ashingdon Parish it should be low in density and match the character of existing dwellings nearby in order to have the lowest possible environmental impact.
If housing development were approved in or near Ashingdon Parish it should be low in density and match the character of existing dwellings nearby in order to have the lowest possible environmental impact.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18609
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Richard Duvall
1. No encroachment on green belt.
2. Brays Lane traffic problems
3. Alternative suggestion
This is an unacceptable encroachment into green belt and the arbitrary northern limit does not provide a defensible boundary to further encroachment northwards. It is currently valuable as arable land and its use should not be changed. Use for housing would destroy a great deal of the existing mature hedging at its boundary on the north side of Brays Lane.
Brays Lane is already overloaded with heavy lorry traffic and development of this site would dangerously add to this.
The western segment of this area is part of a field that stretches northwards to existing housing. This field has an existing hedge/ tree line which would provide a defensible boundary and could accommodate in the region of 30 houses; this would represent a more acceptable alternative. Access could be acheived via Golden Cross Road avoiding adding additional loading to Brays Lane.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19361
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: CPREssex
This site has implications for traffic on Ashingdon Road.
This site has implications for traffic on Ashingdon Road.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19505
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: Squiers/Croll Group
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
OPTION EA2
Whilst development in this location is supported, it should not come forward in isolation as it cannot deliver the improvements to King Edmund School. Further, this site area (2.91 ha) could only accommodate around 63 dwellings, which is considerably lower than the quantum set out in the Core Strategy.
OPTION EA2
Whilst development in this location is supported, it should not come forward in isolation as it cannot deliver the improvements to King Edmund School. Further, this site area (2.91 ha) could only accommodate around 63 dwellings, which is considerably lower than the quantum set out in the Core Strategy.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19763
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Stolkin and Clements (Southend) LLP
Agent: Firstplan
Option EA2 provides separation between the eastern edge of Rochford and development along Brays Lane. Therefore, if developed, it would lead to this existing development becoming part of Rochford. It will also be difficult to provide a defensible green belt boundary to the north of the site.
Option EA2 provides separation between the eastern edge of Rochford and development along Brays Lane. Therefore, if developed, it would lead to this existing development becoming part of Rochford. It will also be difficult to provide a defensible green belt boundary to the north of the site.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 21584
Received: 28/04/2010
Respondent: Aber Ltd
Agent: Colliers International
This location is further from Rochford Town Centre and train station than other options that are being considered for Rochford, which are considered to more sustainable development options.
Option EA1 is also considered as a suitable location for the expansion of King Edmund School (KES2 & KES3), therefore there is a potential conflict with another key objective of the document.
Option EA2 & EA3, both of these options are located wholly or partly to the north of Brays Lane, and would not create a defensible boundary, contrary to PPG2.
This location is further from Rochford Town Centre and train station than other options that are being considered for Rochford, which are considered to more sustainable development options.
Option EA1 is also considered as a suitable location for the expansion of King Edmund School (KES2 & KES3), therefore there is a potential conflict with another key objective of the document.
Option EA2 & EA3, both of these options are located wholly or partly to the north of Brays Lane, and would not create a defensible boundary, contrary to PPG2.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 22582
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd
Overall RAG rating - Capacity available to serve the proposed growth
RE: ALLOCATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENTS
Thank you for giving Anglian Water the opportunity to comment on the above document.
Please find our comments summarized on the attached document.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 23946
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Kerry Graves
Objection and comments to the housing in East Ashingdon.
See paper copy for details.
Objection and comments to the housing in East Ashingdon.
See paper copy for details.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 24354
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Mr J W Graves
I do not support this option.
For further information, see paper copy
Comments regarding land allocation for East Ashingdon.
For further information, see paper copy.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 24876
Received: 04/05/2010
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Byford
Number of people: 2
This Option, EA2 - a definite non-starter.
Comments received regarding option EA1, EA2, EA3 and KES1.
For further details see paper copy.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 24925
Received: 04/05/2010
Respondent: Mr Raymond Dolphin
objection to loss of green belt north of Brays Lane - lack of infrastructure - see full rep for further details
objection to loss of green belt north of Brays Lane - lack of infrastructure - see full rep for further details
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 24927
Received: 04/05/2010
Respondent: Mr Raymond Dolphin
Mrs Patricia Dolphin - same household/letter as Mr Raymond Dolphin - objection to loss of green belt north of Brays Lane - lack of infrastructure - see full rep for further details
objection to loss of green belt north of Brays Lane - lack of infrastructure - see full rep for further details