4.6.10 General Development Locations Preferred Option
Comment
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 11
Received: 24/05/2007
Respondent: Mr Christos Fantides
I would like to comment that I feel to split 500 dwellings between the smaller communities such as Great Wakering is rather excessive and should be reduced to ensure that areas like Great Wakering remain as a village
I would like to comment that I feel to split 500 dwellings between the smaller communities such as Great Wakering is rather excessive and should be reduced to ensure that areas like Great Wakering remain as a village
Comment
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 13
Received: 29/05/2007
Respondent: Mr K Sanders
Housing Units
Hockley / Hawkwell 400
Hockley/Hawkwell is already overcrowded and does not require any further housing stock. Additionally the current population lacks enough basic facilities (i.e. doctors) and encouraging further numbers to move into the area will be unacceptable. Also the current road infrastructure cannot cope with new housing and it is undesirable to build any new roads.
Housing Units
Hockley / Hawkwell 400
Hockley/Hawkwell is already overcrowded and does not require any further housing stock. Additionally the current population lacks enough basic facilities (i.e. doctors) and encouraging further numbers to move into the area will be unacceptable. Also the current road infrastructure cannot cope with new housing and it is undesirable to build any new roads.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 22
Received: 05/06/2007
Respondent: Mr Alan Wetton
Rayleigh according to your figures has the highest population in the district therefore it does not make sense to put the majority of houses (1800) in that particular area. The station does not have sufficient parking for commuters, trafic congestion at peak times in the centre of Rayleigh is unecceptable. Rayleigh is at its peak and is just sustainable. To develop and take green field locations around the perimetier will make the situation worse. The urbanisation of Rayleigh has brought crime and vandalism to the community, this will only increase.
Rayleigh according to your figures has the highest population in the district therefore it does not make sense to put the majority of houses (1800) in that particular area. The station does not have sufficient parking for commuters, trafic congestion at peak times in the centre of Rayleigh is unecceptable. Rayleigh is at its peak and is just sustainable. To develop and take green field locations around the perimetier will make the situation worse. The urbanisation of Rayleigh has brought crime and vandalism to the community, this will only increase.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 24
Received: 06/06/2007
Respondent: The National Trust Rayleigh Mount Local Committee
The allocation of 1800 new homes to Rayleigh is excessive. West Rayleigh, in particular has had to shoulder the lion's share. It's time other parts of the district, particularly settlements to the east took a greater share. I would support the alternative policies of greater dispersal, making more use of settlements to the east of the district, and greater dispersal to minor settlements.
The allocation of 1800 new homes to Rayleigh is excessive. West Rayleigh, in particular, has had to shoulder the lion's share of new development over the past twenty years, with the consequence that local roads, such as Downhall Road have become excessively congested with traffic. It is time that other parts of the district, particularly settlements to the east, took a greater share of new development, and gave Rayleigh a break from continual rapid expansion. The mortar is hardly dry on the new monstrosities built on the old Park School site - and now we are expected to take another massive batch of housing, what an insult!
I would support the alternative policies of: Greater dispersal, making more use of settlements to the east of the district, and greater dispersal to minor settlements.
Comment
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 43
Received: 07/06/2007
Respondent: Mr Donald Babbage
My concern is increased traffic flow in London Rd & Down Hall Rd Rayleigh. This junction is already dangerous and should have a roundabout(not a mini) or traffic lights - despite police objections !. Increased traffic on these roads which will come from the new developments will turn this junction into a death trap - do something before it happens
My concern is increased traffic flow in London Rd & Down Hall Rd Rayleigh. This junction is already dangerous and should have a roundabout(not a mini) or traffic lights - despite police objections !. Increased traffic on these roads which will come from the new developments will turn this junction into a death trap - do something before it happens
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 49
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Mr Ian Jordan
Allocating 1800 houses to be built in Rayleigh is far too many. With the proposed buffer zones, the only area to build would be in West Rayleigh. This area has already had the majority of new housing in the last ten years and the roads are at peak capacity, with long queues along Rawreth Lane and A129 London Road every day already.
Allocating 1800 houses to be built in Rayleigh is far too many. With the proposed buffer zones, the only area to build would be in West Rayleigh. This area has already had the majority of new housing in the last ten years and the roads are at peak capacity, with long queues along Rawreth Lane and A129 London Road every day already.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 51
Received: 12/06/2007
Respondent: Mr Paul Hunt
The figure of 4600 houses is too high.
The EERA are unelected and should not be allowed to "force" this number on us.
Does the 1800 figure for Rayleigh incude the 901 built 2001-2006?
Rayleigh's road infrastructure including the links to the A127/A130 must be improved. The town one way system is at a standstill most of the day how will this be addressed with the extra people?
The Core strategy document is ambiguous in my opinion with too many "where possibles" and gives the council scope to breach what they are tabling going forward.
Firstly I object to the figure of 4600 houses for Rochford to accommodate. This figure was forced upon us by the EERA, an unelected government quango to whom there is no electorate to answer to and can therefore make decisions without fear of consequences.
Secondly the consultation does not make clear whether Rayleigh is to take 1800 houses or 899 houses as a result of the 901 built from 2001-2006. Can you imagine Rayleigh having to take twice the number already built in the last 5 years?
Rayleigh's infrastructure has already passed breaking point in my opinion, our schools/Doctors/Dentists are at their maximum just ask anyone moving into the area trying to get on a list.
Significant improvements must be made to the road network of Rayleigh including our links to the A127 & A130 before another house should be built. The farce of the ASDA superstore must be learnt from and Rochford DC must stand its ground in regard to infrastructure improvement BEFORE development occurs.
The Core strategy document is far to ambiguous in my opinion with too many "where possibles" and gives the council scope to breach what they are tabling going forward.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 54
Received: 05/06/2007
Respondent: Mr M Stones
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 55
Received: 05/06/2007
Respondent: Ms C Chambers
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 56
Received: 05/06/2007
Respondent: A Goldstein
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 57
Received: 05/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs G Coley
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 58
Received: 05/06/2007
Respondent: Miss A E Ross
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 59
Received: 07/06/2007
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Hurley
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 60
Received: 07/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs P W Taylor
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 61
Received: 07/06/2007
Respondent: Mr G Curling
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 64
Received: 12/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs Alison Mayor
Traffic congestion in Rayleigh has reached such a level that the propsect of 1800 more homes and the ensuing increase in vehicles on the roads will bring the town to a complete standstill.
There should be a greater dispersal of dwellings throughout the region.
Traffic congestion in Rayleigh has reached such a level that the propsect of 1800 more homes and the ensuing increase in vehicles on the roads will bring the town to a complete standstill.
There should be a greater dispersal of dwellings throughout the region.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 65
Received: 07/06/2007
Respondent: K William
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 67
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: R H & J M Wilkinson
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 68
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Mr & Mrs B Thornton
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 69
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Ms G Oliff
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 70
Received: 07/06/2007
Respondent: Mr J Izatt
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 71
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Herdort
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 72
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs P Freshwater
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 73
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Ms H Smith
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 74
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Mr Allen
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 75
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Ms H Marsh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 76
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs Victoria Rees
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 77
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Maddock
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 78
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Mr & Mrs L Henderson
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 79
Received: 08/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs L Anastasi
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.