4.6.10 General Development Locations Preferred Option
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 127
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs A Barrett
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 128
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs L M Newton
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 129
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs Warr
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 130
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Ms S Howard
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 131
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Mr & Mrs T G Dunn
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 132
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: J C Gibson
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 133
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs S Howey
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 134
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Mr C B Morling
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 135
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Burke
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 136
Received: 11/06/2007
Respondent: Mr R Perry
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 139
Received: 12/06/2007
Respondent: W D Ham
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 142
Received: 18/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs Karen Bailey
There has been too much development in rayleigh. Especially Rawreth Lane area .We were promised a community centre , doctors surgery neither of which has happened . The facilities on the old Park school site will not provide adequate public community buildings , not enough school places in the future we have no new dentist. The extra housing has created extra traffic, it almost impossible to exit my roads at certain times of day. Rayleigh High Street has lengthy queues . These factors should be taken into account and 1800 new houses in Rayleigh should not go ahead.
There has been too much development in rayleigh. Especially Rawreth Lane area .We were promised a community centre , doctors surgery neither of which has happened . The facilities on the old Park school site will not provide adequate public community buildings , not enough school places in the future we have no new dentist. The extra housing has created extra traffic, it almost impossible to exit my roads at certain times of day. Rayleigh High Street has lengthy queues . These factors should be taken into account and 1800 new houses in Rayleigh should not go ahead.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 143
Received: 18/06/2007
Respondent: Mr Mark Bailey
Agent: Mr Mark Bailey
there has been too much development in this area especially Rawreth lane area . we could not cope with 1800 new houses.
there has been too much development in this area especially Rawreth lane area . we could not cope with 1800 new houses.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 145
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs D Sharp
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 147
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs M Coster
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 148
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs P A Linsley
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 149
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: J A Cook
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 150
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mr P D Gale
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 151
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs A Newman
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 152
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mr R Brond
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 153
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mr M Johnson
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 154
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mr A White
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 155
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mr N Read
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 156
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs J Nutter
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 157
Received: 15/06/2007
Respondent: Mr G Rowland
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
The building of 1,800 additional homes in Rayleigh is utterly unacceptable. It would put intolerable pressure on our local roads, schools and G.P. services. It would also mean a devastating loss of Green Belt land. Future residential development should be spread more evenly over the whole of the Rochford District, so that a smaller, fairer burden falls on Rayleigh
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 162
Received: 19/06/2007
Respondent: Mrs Gillian Tautz
Too much development already (nobody even wanted Asda)with too little infrastructure.
Too much development already (nobody even wanted Asda)with too little infrastructure.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 163
Received: 19/06/2007
Respondent: Mr Steven Tautz
Insufficient road network and general infrastrucutre at present. Already too much development in Rayleigh.
Insufficient road network and general infrastrucutre at present. Already too much development in Rayleigh.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 164
Received: 19/06/2007
Respondent: Miss Tina Collins
I would like to register my objection to the proposed general development location plan with regards to 1800 new houses to be built in the Rayleigh/Rawreth area. This area has been heavily developed over the past few years and I believe that more housing would be detrimental to the area. I therefore strongly object to this proposal.
I would like to register my objection to the proposed general development location plan with regards to 1800 new houses to be built in the Rayleigh/Rawreth area. This area has been heavily developed over the past few years and I believe that more housing would be detrimental to the area. I therefore strongly object to this proposal.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 165
Received: 19/06/2007
Respondent: Mr Russell Hoy
I would like to register my objection to the proposed general development location plan with regards to 1800 new houses to be built in the Rayleigh/Rawreth area. This area has been heavily developed over the past few years and I believe that more housing would be detrimental to the area. I therefore strongly object to this proposal.
I would like to register my objection to the proposed general development location plan with regards to 1800 new houses to be built in the Rayleigh/Rawreth area. This area has been heavily developed over the past few years and I believe that more housing would be detrimental to the area. I therefore strongly object to this proposal.
Object
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Representation ID: 166
Received: 19/06/2007
Respondent: Dr Deanne Hooper
OBJECT - should be fairly distributed throughout district (not majority in rayleigh) and only once infrastructure and resources are proven to be in place and will cope with the extra housing
The existing Rayleigh infrastructure and resources needs to expand before ANY further housing is planned. We live on the busy Rawreth Lane and have grave fears regarding traffic on this road should any more housing be added. As parents with young children with have serious concerns regarding school places for our children and doctor's surgeries. We currently have to drive to school which is our 3rd nearest school and have to drive to our doctors. We object to the vase majority of district housing being "dumped" on Rayleigh rather than shared equally throughout the district and AFTER resources / infrastructure are in place to cope with them