Object

Allocations Submission Document

Representation ID: 28658

Received: 23/01/2013

Respondent: Mrs Sally Simmons

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Also it doesn't need to be done because there is better allocations in the village, which will have less impact on the church and the village as a whole. I do not feel the council has involved the village enough and we need time and more consultations to make this decision. Dog walkers and ramblers enjoy the peace and beauty of this area and we attract people from outside the area to see its beauty, and use the many quiet public footpaths that surround this beautiful area.

Full text:

I object because I think the view of the church should be saved for all to enjoy. The site chosen is on an elevated area with really bad drainage and there are constant water problems whenever it rains.This view can be seen for miles and the church and surrounding areas are of historic significance, also the church is a grade II listed building as is the vicarage, the council says they will be sympathetic, but by surrounding the church with houses I do not see how this can be done. There are better allocations which will have less impact on the village.