Policy SER7 - South Canewdon
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28413
Received: 07/01/2013
Respondent: Canewdon Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Members strongly object to development west of Church Road as it considers that there would not be a defensive Green Belt boundary which could then lead to further development in the future. Members felt that Anchor Lane and Church Road provide a strong defensible boundary and that development should be restricted to the east of Church Road.
Members felt that the highway network was working at full capacity at present and that future development could bring the district to a standstill.
The Parish Council is disappointed that, following consultation with parishioners in 2010 as to their preferred site for development, these views have not been considered by the District Council.
Members strongly object to development west of Church Road as it considers that there would not be a defensive Green Belt boundary which could then lead to further development in the future. Members felt that Anchor Lane and Church Road provide a strong defensible boundary and that development should be restricted to the east of Church Road.
Concerns were raised regarding the highway capacity throughout the whole district if all the proposed development was to be undertaken. Members felt that the highway network was working at full capacity at present and that future development could bring the district to a standstill.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28579
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Raoul Chittenden
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The vicarage is also Grade II listed, along with Whitehouse Farm in Lark Hill Road, which would front the development, you say you want to be sympathetic to these buildings but why even build near them when there are better allocations in Canewdon, especially when the parish council are totally against building on church land. The lane going to St Nicholas's church also serves a working farm which has substantial heavy plant machinery travelling up and down which would not be good for the proposed development/residents. No main drainage west of the church road and poor surface water drainage .
I strongly object to this proposed site in Canewdon. This site chosen by the council is on elevated land, which would make the development look top heavy, and would surround and dwarf the view of the church which is a well known and iconic view, and is a gradeii star listed building, you can't make this view look better it can only look worse with houses.When you drive down Scotts Hall road the view of the church will be ruined, the existing housing is already dense around the church, and this is only going to add to the situation. This allocation was never the preferred site.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28613
Received: 22/01/2013
Respondent: mr mark swords
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
There is no need for more housing in this area. I'm already in dispute with the council over the housing planned on hall road. This area is not able to handle the traffic and it will increase danger to the public on the road. If more houses are needed then free up the houses taken by foreigners living on benefits that we pay for. They can go back home and our people, working people can have the homes. There is no need for more houses!!!!!!!!!
There is no need for more housing in this area. I'm already in dispute with the council over the housing planned on hall road. This area is not able to handle the traffic and it will increase danger to the public on the road. If more houses are needed then free up the houses taken by foreigners living on benefits that we pay for. They can go back home and our people, working people can have the homes. There is no need for more houses!!!!!!!!!
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28615
Received: 22/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Neil Sanderson
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
I do not think this should go ahead as it is not in keeping with the village and the council will surely overstretch its resources to provide for that many extra homes.
I do not believe this development would be of any benefit to the village or for any people who may plan to move into these new developments. Canewdon is not a commuter village as other towns nearby like Rochford, Hockley, Ashingdon and even Southend have more than enough space and the necessary services to provide for more housing. Canewdon is a small isolated place that would suffer with an increase in it's population. The roads would need far more upkeep than they currently get, the bus service would have to be greatly improved, recycling and waste disposal would have to be increased. All of these factors surely would cancel out the need for further development? Can the local school handle a much greater influx of children? Will nearby secondary schools be happy to provide bus services for extra pupils should it be needed?
All this just adds to the fact that although the planned site appears that it won't overly encroach on the sight of the church or the views over the farmers fields it undoubtedly will. It will add more congestion to an already small and unfit access road that leads to the church and will make the crossroads on the entrance to the village look like an urban environment rather than a village in the countryside.
Basically I do not think this proposition would be good for the village or in keeping with it's aesthetic.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28616
Received: 22/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Keith Williams
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The reason for my objection to the proposal is that it will impact on the immediate area of the village, spoil the view of the church both from the south but also the view in the opposite direction ie looking south over the Thames estuary.
Historically the church has been the central focus of the village and on the southern approach to the village the view of the church should remain unimpeded.
The reason for my objection to the proposal is that it will impact on the immediate area of the village, spoil the view of the church both from the south but also the view in the opposite direction ie looking south over the Thames estuary.
Historically the church has been the central focus of the village and on the southern approach to the village the view of the church should remain unimpeded.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28617
Received: 22/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Sean Cripps
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The proposal is unacceptable on numerous grounds.
Land on the eastern boundary has been subject to subsidence in the past, and no survey has identified this. There would be a possible impact on the structural integrity of existing homes and garages bordering the site. Further west the land is green belt, and the development would have a massively detrimental effect on the character, environment and wildlife of the village - even the development plan identifies the 'sensitive' topography of the site and its proximity to the church and listed buildings.
Finally, the development would hugely affect the value of neighbouring properties.
The proposal is unacceptable on numerous grounds.
Land on the eastern boundary has been subject to subsidence in the past, and no survey has identified this. There would be a possible impact on the structural integrity of existing homes and garages bordering the site. Further west the land is green belt, and the development would have a massively detrimental effect on the character, environment and wildlife of the village - even the development plan identifies the 'sensitive' topography of the site and its proximity to the church and listed buildings.
Finally, the development would hugely affect the value of neighbouring properties.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28618
Received: 22/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Robert Foreman
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Better alternatives to this site e.g. site 223b and does not impinge on views of church which is the prime characteristic of the village.
Better alternatives to this site e.g. site 223b and does not impinge on views of church which is the prime characteristic of the village.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28619
Received: 22/01/2013
Respondent: Ms Anita Cope-Prior
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The proposed development site will destroy the village appeal
On approaching canewdon village from either Scott's hall lane or lark hill road the church creates an imposing visual impression, encompassing, in one glance country life. The one track country lane, flanked on both sides by green fields, leads us to our church. You only need take a brief stroll up the lane to be transported back in time, with views across the grassland towards the church
The proposed development site will destroy the village appeal
On approaching canewdon village from either Scott's hall lane or lark hill road the church creates an imposing visual impression, encompassing, in one glance country life. The one track country lane, flanked on both sides by green fields, leads us to our church. You only need take a brief stroll up the lane to be transported back in time, with views across the grassland towards the church
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28622
Received: 22/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Lorna Brunning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Greenfield land
Raised preposed building site instead of low lying land
Sewage and water pressures
Environmental Impact
An average of at least 120 cars.
Visual Impact on the Village and Church.
Public services
.Greenfield land should not be built on especially as it can/is used for farming. The sewage system and water pressure will be extremely impacted especially as they are not very good at the current amount of properties within the village. With the building of at a minimum of 60 homes that will increase the number of vehicles on average by 120 which dramaticly will impact the environment and the surrounding area.
But the MAJOR problem is the preposed site and the elevation of this site making an extremely horrid impact on the visual look of Canewdon Village as well as the Church. There is a bus service but it is a village service so only runs a reduced timetable.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28624
Received: 22/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Derek Cottiss
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
There was a meeting at the village hall to discuss the proposed site for this development and this was not the area that was agreed upon .The meeting was attended by parish and local councillors and members of planning from Rochford council .
The village doesn't have the infrastructure to deal with the 60 +5% of homes.
From the map it would seem that 2 properties will be purchased to complete the development, one of these was refused permission to build another bungalow in its grounds due to overdevelopment.
Privacy ,security and outlook for existing homes would be negatively affected.
There was a meeting at the village hall to discuss the proposed site for this development and this was not the area that was agreed upon .The meeting was attended by parish and local councillors and members of planning from Rochford council .
The village doesn't have the infrastructure to deal with the 60 +5% of homes.
From the map it would seem that 2 properties will be purchased to complete the development, one of these was refused permission to build another bungalow in its grounds due to overdevelopment.
Privacy ,security and outlook for existing homes would be negatively affected.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28625
Received: 22/01/2013
Respondent: Miss Carol Bennett
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
People who live in our village community do so because it is a small, quiet location. The prospect of new 60+ houses being built in a small village is both alarming and upsetting. Parking is already a problem here, with cars parked in every conceivable place, some a danger to pedestrians and other road uses. It is more than likely that new houses will bring approx 2 cars per family (most villages need a car as we have very limited bus service) this will make our village noisier and busier. A prospect that we would not want.
People who live in our village community do so because it is a small, quiet location. The prospect of new 60+ houses being built in a small village is both alarming and upsetting. Parking is already a problem here, with cars parked in every conceivable place, some a danger to pedestrians and other road uses. It is more than likely that new houses will bring approx 2 cars per family (most villages need a car as we have very limited bus service) this will make our village noisier and busier. A prospect that we would not want.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28628
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: mrs rowena warren
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The roads are already not maintained properly and the antiquated sewer system will not cope..The prowtings site at the top of the high street already have issues with overflowing of sewers. Also it will spoil the rural setting of the village, also thought it was GREEN BELT land??!!!! We do not need more houses putting more strains on resources and spoil the view of the church, which I feel pleasureable to see as i approach the village.
The roads are already not maintained properly and the antiquated sewer system will not cope..The prowtings site at the top of the high street already have issues with overflowing of sewers. Also it will spoil the rural setting of the village, also thought it was GREEN BELT land??!!!! We do not need more houses putting more strains on resources and spoil the view of the church, which I feel pleasureable to see as i approach the village.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28631
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Alan Davison
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
In life there are crazy ideas and crazy ideas and this unfortunately is one of them How on earth anyone can want to build house on the site that has NOW been chosen is beyond comprehension. The original site that was chosen and passed at the meeting in Canewdon a few years ago was the perfect place, but this one so close to the church would just be an eye sore on the landscape and a logistical nightmare for all concerned. Please please please think again and go back to the original plan
In life there are crazy ideas and crazy ideas and this unfortunately is one of them How on earth anyone can want to build house on the site that has NOW been chosen is beyond comprehension. The original site that was chosen and passed at the meeting in Canewdon a few years ago was the perfect place, but this one so close to the church would just be an eye sore on the landscape and a logistical nightmare for all concerned. Please please please think again and go back to the original plan
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28632
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Clement Freeman
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
I walk the footpaths around Canewdon on an almost daily basis and some of the best views of the church are heading towards Canewdon on the footpaths from Rochford. Also the view from the footpath crossing the field above the proposed site out across Rochford,Southend and the Thames Estuary. These views would be destroyed should the proposed development take place. The church would effectively be surrounded from the south,east and north. The view to the south would become just the back of more housing rather than an open scene of the little countryside left in this corner of Essex.
I walk the footpaths around Canewdon on an almost daily basis and some of the best views of the church are heading towards Canewdon on the footpaths from Rochford. Also the view from the footpath crossing the field above the proposed site out across Rochford,Southend and the Thames Estuary. These views would be destroyed should the proposed development take place. The church would effectively be surrounded from the south,east and north. The view to the south would become just the back of more housing rather than an open scene of the little countryside left in this corner of Essex.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28634
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Ritchie Storer
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Canewdon Infant and Primary school is more than at capacity.
The bus/transportation is poor due to the transport system in place.
The parking in the area is already poor. The road going up to the school has cars on either side an can be very hazardous.
With only one local shop in the area, one junior school and a small village hall ,I cannot see how adding a further 60 properties to the area can be justified.
I thought the area was a greenbelt area?? The Church was something to behold of Canewdon's village heritage??
The Canewdon Infant and Primary school is more than at capacity.
The bus/transportation is poor due to the transport system in place.
The parking in the area is already poor. The road going up to the school has cars on either side an can be very hazardous.
With only one local shop in the area, one junior school and a small village hall ,I cannot see how adding a further 60 properties to the area can be justified.
I thought the area was a greenbelt area?? The Church was something to behold of Canewdon's village heritage??
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28639
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Judith Bedford
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Building the houses planned will totaly ruin the veiws of this very famous church , There is three ways out of the village via Lark Hill , Stambridge and Brays Lane which all lead to one main road the Ashingdon road which is all ways nose to tail in rush hours and generally a busy road , having more houses means more cars and more traffic, more children bored !!! We dont even have a good public transport service, or a good police pressence !
Building the houses planned will totaly ruin the veiws of this very famous church , There is three ways out of the village via Lark Hill , Stambridge and Brays Lane which all lead to one main road the Ashingdon road which is all ways nose to tail in rush hours and generally a busy road , having more houses means more cars and more traffic, more children bored !!! We dont even have a good public transport service, or a good police pressence !
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28645
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Maria McDonough
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Canewdon is a small village with neither the facilities nor the infrastructure to cope with a further 60 dwellings. The school does not have the space, there are only two shops and 1 bus route, another 60 dwellings would prove too much, both for the existing facilities and the infrastructure. Canewdon is not the place to build, especially when there are loads of brownfield sites laying dormant and empty in Southend . . . Please reconsider where you build and LEAVE the countryside alone!
Canewdon is a small village with neither the facilities nor the infrastructure to cope with a further 60 dwellings. The school does not have the space, there are only two shops and 1 bus route, another 60 dwellings would prove too much, both for the existing facilities and the infrastructure. Canewdon is not the place to build, especially when there are loads of brownfield sites laying dormant and empty in Southend . . . Please reconsider where you build and LEAVE the countryside alone!
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28650
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Ritchie Storer
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Canewdon Infant and Primary school is more than at capacity.
The bus/transportation service is as now every hour this is due to the transport system in place at the area.
The parking in the area is already over its limits. The road going up to the school can be very hazardous.
With only one local shop, a junior school and a small village hall ,I cannot see how adding a further 60 properties to the area can be justified.
I also thought the area was a greenbelt area?? The Church was something to behold of Canewdon's village heritage??
The Canewdon Infant and Primary school is more than at capacity.
The bus/transportation service is as now every hour this is due to the transport system in place at the area.
The parking in the area is already over its limits. The road going up to the school can be very hazardous.
With only one local shop, a junior school and a small village hall ,I cannot see how adding a further 60 properties to the area can be justified.
I also thought the area was a greenbelt area?? The Church was something to behold of Canewdon's village heritage??
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28653
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Patricia Fitzpatrick
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A development on this site should not take place on what is a greenfield site which would change the character of the village. I would think that the develoment along Lark Hill Road would cause a significant road safety risk. In addition there is no pavement streching from the bottom of Church Hill up to the area of the 1st detached houses along Anchor Lane.
Why is the proposal for the development on the land running to the east of Scotts Hall Lane been exchanged for this one.
Along with the Parish Council I firmly oppose this proposal
A development on this site should not take place on what is a greenfield site which would change the character of the village. I would think that the develoment along Lark Hill Road would cause a significant road safety risk. In addition there is no pavement streching from the bottom of Church Hill up to the area of the 1st detached houses along Anchor Lane.
Why is the proposal for the development on the land running to the east of Scotts Hall Lane been exchanged for this one.
Along with the Parish Council I firmly oppose this proposal
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28654
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Miss Joan Marshall
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Development west of Church Road, north of Lark Hill Road has been turned down more than once, the last time being 2 years ago when the village was consulted on planning in Canewdon. This site was totally rejected for development by the PCC when it cropped up again in 2012, At this time Canewdon Parish Council also rejected it. Planting trees would still obscure the panoramic view from the top of Church Road where the junction of two of our well used footpaths occurs. The unique view of our Church (floodlit at night) from approaching roads would be lost forever!
Development west of Church Road, north of Lark Hill Road has been turned down more than once, the last time being 2 years ago when the village was consulted on planning in Canewdon. This site was totally rejected for development by the PCC when it cropped up again in 2012, At this time Canewdon Parish Council also rejected it. Planting trees would still obscure the panoramic view from the top of Church Road where the junction of two of our well used footpaths occurs. The unique view of our Church (floodlit at night) from approaching roads would be lost forever!
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28656
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Annette Fairbrass
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
We have lived in Canewdon for 35 years and although the planned housing policy ser 7 south canewdon does not affect our veiw i fear it will serverly spoil the view to and from the beautiful historical church of st nicholas. The other proposed site in Scotts Hall seems a perfect site especially with the farmer contributing a large sum of money and a cricket pitch into the mix i hope you will take our objection seriously many thanks
We have lived in Canewdon for 35 years and although the planned housing policy ser 7 south canewdon does not affect our veiw i fear it will serverly spoil the view to and from the beautiful historical church of st nicholas. The other proposed site in Scotts Hall seems a perfect site especially with the farmer contributing a large sum of money and a cricket pitch into the mix i hope you will take our objection seriously many thanks
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28657
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Jo Smith
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Canewdon is a small peaceful village in a pleasant rural location. Thanks to previous planning consents its not the most attractive place...
Please let's not add to its ugliness, let us preserve and 'nurture' existing dwellings to keep this a desirable rural community. Also the pleasnt view of our outstanding church will be lost forever... Do we actually need extra housing? Who for exactly? We are in a recession so people aren't moving into the area for employment. Canewdon is big enough, lets keep that way.
Canewdon is a small peaceful village in a pleasant rural location. Thanks to previous planning consents its not the most attractive place...
Please let's not add to its ugliness, let us preserve and 'nurture' existing dwellings to keep this a desirable rural community. Also the pleasnt view of our outstanding church will be lost forever... Do we actually need extra housing? Who for exactly? We are in a recession so people aren't moving into the area for employment. Canewdon is big enough, lets keep that way.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28658
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Sally Simmons
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Also it doesn't need to be done because there is better allocations in the village, which will have less impact on the church and the village as a whole. I do not feel the council has involved the village enough and we need time and more consultations to make this decision. Dog walkers and ramblers enjoy the peace and beauty of this area and we attract people from outside the area to see its beauty, and use the many quiet public footpaths that surround this beautiful area.
I object because I think the view of the church should be saved for all to enjoy. The site chosen is on an elevated area with really bad drainage and there are constant water problems whenever it rains.This view can be seen for miles and the church and surrounding areas are of historic significance, also the church is a grade II listed building as is the vicarage, the council says they will be sympathetic, but by surrounding the church with houses I do not see how this can be done. There are better allocations which will have less impact on the village.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28659
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Jeff Shepherd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
I disagree with this proposed development due to it being developed on the raised area beneath the church.This will destroy the view of the church.As is normal nowadays councils and MP's can't be trusted and they always,like in this situation,try and get things passed sneakily and change the plans.
I disagree with this proposed development due to it being developed on the raised area beneath the church.This will destroy the view of the church.As is normal nowadays councils and MP's can't be trusted and they always,like in this situation,try and get things passed sneakily and change the plans.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28660
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Joanna Gibson
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Against this area for building as per comments above. There is no infrastructure to support this many houses. This would devastate our family life and the wider community.
(1) it will obscure the beautiful view of st Nicholas church, (2) we moved to the country and don't want a housing estate at the end of our garden (3) our home is our haven into which we have invested thousands of pounds of our hard earned money, building here will ruin our surroundings and take away our view overlooking Southend (4) canewdon is the last reminding small village south of the river roach - this should be preserved. (5) surely the drainage wouldn't cope with more housing as can't cope now. (6) the school is full and cannot take more pupils
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28661
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Mike Wright
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Two years ago the Parish Council asked the Village which site was preferable and the site South of Anchor Lane & East of Scotts Hall Road was preferred. The Parochial Church Council also preferred the same location.
The scenic aspect of the Church itself will be severely compromised if the current proposal is accepted.
It will now be a travesty if a high-powered submission from developers / the Church authorities, should take precedence over the the local people, ie. The Canewdon Parish Council and the Canewdon PCC.
Please reject this and go back to the original proposal.
Two years ago the Parish Council asked the Village which site was preferable and the site South of Anchor Lane & East of Scotts Hall Road was preferred. The Parochial Church Council also preferred the same location.
The scenic aspect of the Church itself will be severely compromised if the current proposal is accepted.
It will now be a travesty if a high-powered submission from developers / the Church authorities, should take precedence over the the local people, ie. The Canewdon Parish Council and the Canewdon PCC.
Please reject this and go back to the original proposal.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28662
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Elizabeth Rudd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
As a village I feel that the sense of community will gradually fade as more houses are built here. The church is an important focal point of Canewdon and many properties will be affected by not only losing the feeling of country living but more traffic will be using roads already unable to cope at times.
As a village I feel that the sense of community will gradually fade as more houses are built here. The church is an important focal point of Canewdon and many properties will be affected by not only losing the feeling of country living but more traffic will be using roads already unable to cope at times.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28665
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: mrs Lesley Crone
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
I strongly object to any development West of Church Road This would destroy the view of The church which should remain unimpeded It wouldn't stop there within a very short time a second development would be on the cards, we must keep the green belt boundary.
As to 60+ houses are we to take it that this will mean a great improvement to the infrastructure of the district to cope with this many as at present it can hardly cope with what is already here.
I strongly object to any development West of Church Road This would destroy the view of The church which should remain unimpeded It wouldn't stop there within a very short time a second development would be on the cards, we must keep the green belt boundary.
As to 60+ houses are we to take it that this will mean a great improvement to the infrastructure of the district to cope with this many as at present it can hardly cope with what is already here.
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28670
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mr Steve Ayers
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
This proposed scheme has been promoted above all other sites with no regard for the village, it's character and one of the most historic churches in Essex - there are low lying sites in the village that would be far more suitable without blighting the surroundings.
It was clearly stated to me by a senior council officer that development would not be on the site in question and in fact not on any raised a reason the Crouch estuary - odd it now appears acceptable
Don't ruin such an amazing building to residential development
This proposed scheme has been promoted above all other sites with no regard for the village, it's character and one of the most historic churches in Essex - there are low lying sites in the village that would be far more suitable without blighting the surroundings.
It was clearly stated to me by a senior council officer that development would not be on the site in question and in fact not on any raised a reason the Crouch estuary - odd it now appears acceptable
Don't ruin such an amazing building to residential development
Object
Allocations Submission Document
Representation ID: 28671
Received: 23/01/2013
Respondent: Mrs Cara Ayers
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Outrageous that our elected Councillors feel its acceptable to develop adjacent to a Grade 2* listed building - a church that is one of the most important and historic within Essex
This site has been questionably promoted going against all the early comments and preferences of the Council's officers
To put a development on a raised section of the village beggars belief
The development will also be adjacent to a 600 year old farm house - what more can RDC do to blight two most valuable, characterful buildings in the district - vandalism of our District
Outrageous that our elected Councillors feel its acceptable to develop adjacent to a Grade 2* listed building - a church that is one of the most important and historic within Essex
This site has been questionably promoted going against all the early comments and preferences of the Council's officers
To put a development on a raised section of the village beggars belief
The development will also be adjacent to a 600 year old farm house - what more can RDC do to blight two most valuable, characterful buildings in the district - vandalism of our District