Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 24007
Received: 23/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Gary Congram
I agree to the approach providing it is to the detriment of an existing school and community. What happens to the school Rawreth already have? Why can that not be developed? A pedestrian walkway over the Chelmsford Road would allow the current school to be still used. What about unused capacity at other local primary school in Rayleigh and Hullbridge. Hullbridge children have to pay and travel to Rayleigh for secondary education why can new housing occupants not go to other schools?
Objection to development planned for Hullbridge.
No statement or cross reference to specific pages that show the impact of developments to the following:-
Local Telephone Exchange
Buses
Local Medical Centres
Local Junior/Infants School
Local Community Centre
Local pre-schools
Local Post Office
Local sorting office
Secondary Schools
Allotment space
Local Leisure Centre
Local shops
Pubs and clubs
Railway station
Electricity supply for (homes, street lighting)
Water supply (inparticular connectivity to existing varied systems)
Sewage treatment works
Drainage systems (in particular connectivity to existing varied systems)
River Crouch /Roach (surface and sewage overflows?)
Surrounding farmers fields
Existing properties
Local Fire Brigade
Local Police
Local Ambulance Service
Recycling centre
Refuse collections
Flooding issues
Detailed response provided, including various questions raised; please see paper copy for further details and appendices.