Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 21579

Received: 28/04/2010

Respondent: Aber Ltd

Agent: Colliers International

Representation Summary:

Option WH1 although has a defensible boundary in the form of the woodland to the north and west, however, it does extend unnecessary into the Green Belt when you consider that there is a suitable Brownfield option (WH2).

The boundaries to Options WH3 & WH4 have been drawn arbitrary around the existing settlement and as such there would be no defensible Green Belt boundary, contrary to PPG2.

Option WH2 is the preferred option in this location as it would result in the redeveloped of previously developed land and create a defensible Green Belt boundary.

Full text:

Option WH1 although has a defensible boundary in the form of the woodland to the north and west, however, it does extend unnecessary into the Green Belt when you consider that there is a suitable Brownfield option (WH2).

The boundaries to Options WH3 & WH4 have been drawn arbitrary around the existing settlement and as such there would be no defensible Green Belt boundary, contrary to PPG2.

Option WH2 is the preferred option in this location as it would result in the redeveloped of previously developed land and create a defensible Green Belt boundary.