Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 20109
Received: 22/04/2010
Respondent: Mr R Timms
Dear Sirs, i wish to object to the housing options proposed for options NLR1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, as i believe that they will have a negative effect on the area. I do not think that using agricultural land for building is a good idea and nor do i believe that the area can cope with the additional traffic that will be generated. Having lived in the are for 16 years i have seen it change from a semi rural location and the infrascruture can not sustain this additional housing. Rayleigh and Rawreth should remain apart and not joined together by further building. This green belt land must be protected.
Dear Sirs, i wish to object to the housing options proposed for options NLR1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, as i believe that they will have a negative effect on the area. I do not think that using agricultural land for building is a good idea and nor do i believe that the area can cope with the additional traffic that will be generated. Having lived in the are for 16 years i have seen it change from a semi rural location and the infrascruture can not sustain this additional housing. Rayleigh and Rawreth should remain apart and not joined together by further building. This green belt land must be protected.