Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18643
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Sarah Byford
No. Most of the sites put forward relate to the loss of agricultural greenfield sites - when it's gone, it's gone forever. Any sites for development should be as unobtrusive and sympathetic to the surroundings in order to maintain the character of Canewdon - this should be preserved as far as possible as there are few villages like it in the district. No doubt Rochford, Ashingdon, Hockley etc resembled a village in an earlier life!
No. Most of the sites put forward relate to the loss of agricultural greenfield sites - when it's gone, it's gone forever. Any sites for development should be as unobtrusive and sympathetic to the surroundings in order to maintain the character of Canewdon - this should be preserved as far as possible as there are few villages like it in the district. No doubt Rochford, Ashingdon, Hockley etc resembled a village in an earlier life!