Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18639
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Sarah Byford
60 houses for Canewdon is excessive and puts a strain on current infrastructure. Traffic levels in surrounding areas already create difficulties and are unavoidable when travelling out of Canewdon. Such large development in rural location with lack of facilities are not attractive to everyone. Not environmentally friendly if encouraging movement of families into village who need cars to get to work. If development is required, part of SC3 seems to be the best location as within current village boundary, extenson of housing along Anchor Lane, with less impact on views and no loss of agricultural / green field.
60 houses for Canewdon is excessive and puts a strain on current infrastructure. Traffic levels in surrounding areas already create difficulties and are unavoidable when travelling out of Canewdon. Such large development in rural location with lack of facilities are not attractive to everyone. Not environmentally friendly if encouraging movement of families into village who need cars to get to work. If development is required, part of SC3 seems to be the best location as within current village boundary, extenson of housing along Anchor Lane, with less impact on views and no loss of agricultural / green field.