Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18632
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Sarah Byford
Most appropriate site If any development is to go ahead - but not including green field as loss of agricultural greenbelt and no natural boundary to rest of field to prevent further development 'sprawl'. Must also consider limited loss of views by nearby houses. New development here would not be as out of place compared to green field options - within current village boundary, and already partly developed - promote as brownfield site? Potential for required number of houses if play space is not included - we may have sufficient playspaces in the village already?
Most appropriate site If any development is to go ahead - but not including green field as loss of agricultural greenbelt and no natural boundary to rest of field to prevent further development 'sprawl'. Must also consider limited loss of views by nearby houses. New development here would not be as out of place compared to green field options - within current village boundary, and already partly developed - promote as brownfield site? Potential for required number of houses if play space is not included - we may have sufficient playspaces in the village already?