Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18551
Received: 08/04/2010
Respondent: A J & B P Springall
Representation Summary:
In principle we do not agree with any of the options put forward because we disagree with the loss of any further Green Belt land for development. The additional housing needs of Hawkwell are far less than 175 and such needs can easily be accommodated on smaller brown field sites rather than Green Belt.
Full text:
In principle we do not agree with any of the options put forward because we disagree with the loss of any further Green Belt land for development. The additional housing needs of Hawkwell are far less than 175 and such needs can easily be accommodated on smaller brown field sites rather than Green Belt.