Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 18394

Received: 25/04/2010

Respondent: MR GRAHAM STROUD

Representation Summary:

A similar application for this site was made in 2001. All the reasons for its rejection then still stand today and are even more relevant. Like many of my neighbours, I am extremely suspicious of this obsession with the expansion of King Edmund school. A new school should be built in the expanding Shoebury/Wakering area. Pupils would no longer need to travel from there. The result would be less traffic congestion and places at King Edmund would become available for local children. I will be sending a more comprehensive objection to the council by post.

Full text:

A similar application for this site was made in 2001. All the reasons for its rejection then still stand today and are even more relevant. Like many of my neighbours, I am extremely suspicious of this obsession with the expansion of King Edmund school. A new school should be built in the expanding Shoebury/Wakering area. Pupils would no longer need to travel from there. The result would be less traffic congestion and places at King Edmund would become available for local children. I will be sending a more comprehensive objection to the council by post.