Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17783
Received: 06/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Andrew Allen
RDC have not properly considered all potental options sufficiently. They have concentrated on a limited number of large sites regardless of their current use, how they contribute to national Green Belt Policy, or what the impact is in relation to existing residential envelope. They have not provided supporting evidence to justify their evaluation of sites that do not fall into thier "preferred locations", and they have not justified why their preffered locations are preffered sufficiently. The rational employed seems to be focussed in on large sites only which is a mistake that will cost all RDC residents.
RDC have not properly considered all potental options sufficiently. They have concentrated on a limited number of large sites regardless of their current use, how they contribute to national Green Belt Policy, or what the impact is in relation to existing residential envelope. They have not provided supporting evidence to justify their evaluation of sites that do not fall into thier "preferred locations", and they have not justified why their preffered locations are preffered sufficiently. The rational employed seems to be focussed in on large sites only which is a mistake that will cost all RDC residents.