New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Search representations

Results for Essex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q56a. Do you agree with our vision for Rayleigh? Is there anything you feel is missing?

Representation ID: 40446

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q57a. Do you agree with our vision for Rochford and Ashingdon?

Representation ID: 40447

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q58a. Do you agree with our vision for Hockley and Hawkwell?

Representation ID: 40448

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q59a. Do you agree with our vision for the Wakerings and Barling? Is there anything you feel is missing? [Please state reasoning]

Representation ID: 40449

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q60a. Do you agree with our vision for Hullbridge?

Representation ID: 40450

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q60a. Do you agree with our vision for Canewdon? Is there anything you feel is missing? [Please state reasoning]

Representation ID: 40451

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q62a. Do you agree with our vision for Great Stambridge? Is there anything you feel is missing? [Please state reasoning]

Representation ID: 40452

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q63a. Do you agree with our vision for Rawreth? Is there anything you feel is missing? [Please state reasoning]

Representation ID: 40453

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q64a. Do you agree with our vision for Paglesham? Is there anything you feel is missing? [Please state reasoning]

Representation ID: 40454

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q65a. Do you agree with our vision for Sutton and Stonebridge? Is there anything you feel is missing? [Please state reasoning]

Representation ID: 40455

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

In respect of all the nine Community Clusters in Question 56 –65, the following points are made.

ECC welcome the concept of Complete Communities, identifying the location of infrastructure and services, however this does not consider their capacity, which will need to be part of the next stage of plan preparation - what infrastructure and services will need to be planned for and are dependent upon the mix and location of sites and growth areas proposed?

In moving forward, ECC will work with RDC and expect to be fully engaged in the preparation of evidence to assess and refine the growth scenario options. This includes assessments for any impacts and opportunities on ECC infrastructure and services to identify ECC’s requirements. This will enable ECC to identify and explore with RDC any impacts, opportunities and requirements for infrastructure and services, and to identify any necessary mitigation etc, arising from the individual and cumulative growth options.

When considering which communities may benefit from or be able to accommodate growth, the capacity of local schools rather than just their existence needs to be considered. The ECC Planners’ Guide to School Organisation section 3.3. sets out how potential developments may be ranked in terms of their impact.

In respect of education, full details of the next steps and requirements for scenario testing are set out in ECC’s Local and Neighbourhood Planners’ Guide to School Organisation (PDF, 160KB) and ECC Developers’ Guide .

Please refer to ECC’s response to Q6, for full details of ECC’s requirements regarding the need for the scale, pattern and phasing of the growth options to be viable for the sustainable delivery of infrastructure and services, funded through the development proposals.

All Nine Communities - Please see ECC’s initial feedback in the following appendices, however, ECC will continue to provide feedback as part of the preparation of the new Local Plan.

• Appendix A for the LLFA’s technical information regarding the relevant Critical Drainage Areas and the SWMP Action Plan
• Appendix B for the MWPA’s high-level review of the proposed sites against the MLP and WLP. Each site has been assessed for any MSA / MCA / WCA implications, as set out in policy S8 and policy 2 of the MLP and WLP respectively.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.