New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Search representations

Results for Essex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q42. Are there particular open spaces that we should be protecting or improving?

Representation ID: 40434

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

ECC does not seek the schools or school playing pitches to be allocated for community use/public access. There may be potential to consider this in any new school proposals. ECC wish to explore this further with RDC.

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q46. With reference to the options listed above, or your own options, how do you think we can best plan for vibrant town centres in Rochford, Rayleigh and Hockley? How can we also ensure our village and neighbourhood centres remain vibrant? [Please state

Representation ID: 40435

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

ECC recommend consideration and emphasis is placed on regeneration to create vibrant town centres, consider options such as,
• seeking a mix of developments (housing, retail, office, leisure)
• some intensification of housing, optimal use of the land;
• creating flexible commercial space, and co-location of services in “community hubs”;
• considering identifying an optimal location for specific business sectors, science, medical and technology sectors;
• optimising the provision of digital connectivity; and
• seeking opportunities for public realm improvement and focal points, pedestrianisation / car free areas, increase in provision of electric vehicle (EV) charging parking spaces, and inclusion of green spaces.

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q47. Do you agree with the local centre hierarchy set out in Figure 36? If not, what changes would you make? [Please state reasoning]

Representation ID: 40436

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

ECC recommend consideration and emphasis is placed on regeneration to create vibrant town centres, consider options such as,
• seeking a mix of developments (housing, retail, office, leisure)
• some intensification of housing, optimal use of the land;
• creating flexible commercial space, and co-location of services in “community hubs”;
• considering identifying an optimal location for specific business sectors, science, medical and technology sectors;
• optimising the provision of digital connectivity; and
• seeking opportunities for public realm improvement and focal points, pedestrianisation / car free areas, increase in provision of electric vehicle (EV) charging parking spaces, and inclusion of green spaces.

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q48. With reference to Figures 38, 39 and 40, do you agree with existing town centre boundaries and extent of primary and secondary shopping frontages in Rayleigh, Rochford and Hockley? If not, what changes would you make? [Please state reasoning]

Representation ID: 40437

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

ECC recommend consideration and emphasis is placed on regeneration to create vibrant town centres, consider options such as,
• seeking a mix of developments (housing, retail, office, leisure)
• some intensification of housing, optimal use of the land;
• creating flexible commercial space, and co-location of services in “community hubs”;
• considering identifying an optimal location for specific business sectors, science, medical and technology sectors;
• optimising the provision of digital connectivity; and
• seeking opportunities for public realm improvement and focal points, pedestrianisation / car free areas, increase in provision of electric vehicle (EV) charging parking spaces, and inclusion of green spaces.

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q50. With reference to your preferred Strategy Option, are there opportunities for growth to deliver improved retail and leisure services in the District? [Please state reasoning]

Representation ID: 40438

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

ECC recommend consideration and emphasis is placed on regeneration to create vibrant town centres, consider options such as,
• seeking a mix of developments (housing, retail, office, leisure)
• some intensification of housing, optimal use of the land;
• creating flexible commercial space, and co-location of services in “community hubs”;
• considering identifying an optimal location for specific business sectors, science, medical and technology sectors;
• optimising the provision of digital connectivity; and
• seeking opportunities for public realm improvement and focal points, pedestrianisation / car free areas, increase in provision of electric vehicle (EV) charging parking spaces, and inclusion of green spaces.

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q51. With reference to the options above, or your own options, how do you feel we can best address our transport and connectivity needs through the plan?

Representation ID: 40439

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

Evidence base
In developing the new Local Plan, it is of critical importance that consideration be given to the potential transportation and highway impacts that the future spatial strategy and policy may incur and that appropriate mitigation is set out within the Plan to minimise impacts.

Planning for transport and access to provide high quality sustainable transport as well as allowing for potential future radical technological changes involves complex decisions. Important issues to consider include access to local services, low traffic neighbourhoods, public transport strategy, technology and transport, and electric vehicle charging. When delivering future growth, the new Local Plan should consider the impact on the transport network, and the scale of mitigation measures in the form of infrastructure and services needed to accommodate the development proposed. ECC recognises that the new Local Plan will need to have a clear understanding and robust evidence for policies that seek to develop clear modal shift targets and minimise transport trips through location of development and provision of sustainable transport options.

ECC through collaborative working, seeks to ensure the preferred spatial strategy facilitates future sustainable development and growth, but may be accommodated (where required with mitigation) on the local and strategic highway network, with the latter the responsibility of Highways England (having regard to any wider network implications and Lower Thames Crossing).

To develop an effective strategy ECC welcomes joint working on the following matters throughout the Plan preparation process.

1. Transportation and Highways modelling – ECC welcome the close work to date between RDC, SBC and ECC on the initial transport work and the next stages that are to be commissioned. To clarify, transport modelling (either undertaken by Jacobs or other consultants) will require ECC input to, and signing off, the proposed modelling methodology prior to any detailed assessment being undertaken. Any modelling outputs will also need to be agreed with ECC, as the highway authority.

Aspects to consider / address include:
o use of the South Essex Strategic model and integration with it;
o a full transport network assessment, to identify transport mitigation for junctions impacted by the Local Plan development having regard to the existing traffic pressures (see above) and to identify a transport solution which includes sustainable transport networks; and
o Site assessments and appraisals, with a need to review and update including:
- Changing the selection criteria for column 4 “distance to Rail station” from 1.1km to 800m; and
- Reassess the public transport accessibility scoring in terms of bus services within the topic paper.
2. Assessment the active and sustainable travel network (walking, cycling and bus) to support sustainable transport provision, to deliver new and enhance the networks and improving multi modal connectivity across the district, creating choices, promoting modal shift, as part of an integrated transport package to support the planned growth. ECC will need to see due consideration given to the delivery of future active travel (walking and cycling) within any proposed new community(ies) and regarding individual sites. The recommendations of the ECAC seek to prioritise active travel designing walkable and low traffic neighbourhoods, exploring built-in last mile delivery solutions (among other options), delivering Walkable Neighbourhoods and upgrading and expanding the National Cycle Network and integrating with existing local routes. This should include preparation of a LCWIP and infrastructure proposals to improve the bus network and services. It is recommended that the emphasis is expanded to recognise the need to improve and extend the networks, as part of a viable and deliverable integrated transport proposals, within and between new and existing communities within the district including links to neighbouring authorities, creating choices and promoting promote modal shift and ECC wish to explore this further with RDC.

ECC would welcome early indication of the above two points to enable internal resourcing and budgets to be considered and assigned.

3. Integrated transport solutions for the movement of people and goods, to create Safer Greener, Healthier Communities transforming active travel in Essex (for further details see here). These include ensuring,
• appropriate opportunities to promote sustainable transport modes taken up, given the type of development and its location; consideration is given to the Rochford Cycling Action Plan; and the existing bus services for example, to enhance and develop the existing active and sustainable transport network, creating choices to transform connectivity within and between existing and new communities within Rochford and neighbouring areas; and
• safe and suitable access to allocated sites can be achieved for all users. ECC can advise on these matters against ECC standards including on highway design and transport matters relating to new developments; the Highways Technical Manual and Streets and Roads guide, and the Essex Parking Standards are currently being reviewed by the EPOA. A draft is expected to undergo a consultation in Autumn 2021.

4. Cost effective mitigation. Any significant impacts from the development on the transport network (in terms of capacity and congestion), or on highway safety, can be cost effectively mitigated to an acceptable degree.

In developing the preferred spatial strategy and site allocations, consideration should be given to the following:
• Placing emphasis on “movement” rather than traffic; what the movement requirements are, generated by the development and how can these be addressed.
• How new developments will connect and link to existing communities and services and how will they be integrated into the existing settlement, and should seek to avoid creating additional severance. For example, urban extensions need to be connected into the existing town.
• Designing developments to minimise the car traffic they generate – to understand transport requirements we need to understand what will be built.
• How any new proposed roads should be part of an integrated transportation solution - certain types of trip are likely to require a car, or access by van or truck for the movement of freight, as well as buses and provision for active and sustainable travel link.
• Recognising new roads will still be required, however, such investment forms part of a wider transport package integrated with the delivery of defined outcomes, for the connectivity and movement of people and goods.
• The movement of goods and freight within and through Rochford district.
• How new and larger developments are designed to actively promote modal shift through active and sustainable travel and passenger transport provision, promoting walkable neighbourhoods and traffic free areas. Larger scale developments be it extensions or new settlements should not be self-contained and should integrate with the existing communities.
• Delivery and funding mechanisms to finance transportation mitigation and improvements, with developer contributions and consideration on phasing, implementation and delivery, and funding bids to forward finance early delivery of the infrastructure “as loans” to be recovered through developer contributions. Other funding streams such as CIL may also be appropriate.
• Engage and work collaboratively on the development of a joint evidence base to inform the new Local Plan and future highways and transportation policy for Essex, and south Essex in partnership with ASELA, and the A127 Task Force, as well as Transport East.

Existing Network
In preparing a proposed spatial strategy, ECC is already aware of the following potential pinch points along the highway and transportation routes from, to and within the district and South Essex.
1. A127 Strategic Road Network (SRN), proposals are outlined A127 Corridor for Growth - An Economic Plan 2014 (A127 Route Management Strategy), recognises the strategic importance of this transport corridor for south Essex and an essential access point for RDC and SBC)residents and businesses. An A127 Task Force has been established to co-ordinate transport requirements within the A127 corridor, formed by ECC and partners (including ECC, ASELA, London Borough of Havering and Highways England/National Highways.
ECC recommend RDC recognise the importance of the A127 and for safeguarding the corridor within the district to facilitate transport improvements schemes in accordance with the A127 Route Management Strategy. ECC’s specific proposal for safeguarding the route within the Local Plan is made below.

There is a need for ECC to explore cross boundary transportation matters with RDC and SBC, noting both RDC’s current Local Plan consultation and SBC’s current emerging Local Plan consultation which include growth and development proposals that would span the boundary of RDC and SBC, located north of Southend (RDC Spatial Strategy Option 3b). This will need to cover future growth options for LSA; and any highway proposals to open access to this land in the vicinity of the airport, within and across the Southend administrative boundary and reflect and protect them as part of the Local Plan proposals.

2. A127/A130 Fairglen Interchange. The interchange is of strategic importance to the existing and future transport movements in South Essex (including the A13, A127 and A130; with linkages to A12, M25 and Lower Thames Crossing, as well as the A1245). There is a committed and funded short term scheme for the Fairglen Interchange where construction will start soon. However, a long-term scheme is required to deliver longer term growth across South Essex beyond 2036 and to address highway capacity, safety, routing and junction performance issues. This will need also need to include active and sustainable solutions to enhance provision and connectivity in the area. An initial concept drawing for the long-term scheme has been produced (available here) but funding has yet to be secured. ECC recommend that the long term scheme is recognised as part of the strategic context of the draft Plan and growth would positively contribute to any future business case

The Fairglen Interchange should be considered in the wider strategic context taking into account the long term Local Plan housing, employment and infrastructure requirements across South Essex and in particular Rochford, Basildon, Castle Point and Southend local authority areas, and the cumulative impact of their growth on the SRN (in particular the A13, A127 and A130 and the A1245). Any development proposals in this locality should facilitate and not prejudice any long-term scheme for not only Fairglen, but the relationships, linkages, and impacts with cross boundary development and other major transport schemes and proposals, such as those arising from the A127 Task Force and Lower Thames Crossing and their phasing and delivery programmes. The sustainable transport network will also form part of these considerations including walking, cycling and bus rapid transit.

The Department for Transport (DfT) and Highways England/National Highways have proposed and consulted on the Lower Thames Crossing. While the Lower Thames Crossing is not yet firmly committed, it is assumed the high priority given to this project by Government, that it will be constructed during the new Local Plan period. Construction will have an impact on traffic patterns and volumes on the SRN (A13, A127, A130). Further work is required to fully understand the impacts of the Lower Thames Crossing and whether construction provides an opportunity to make a case for early investment in the A13, A127 and A130 (for example the long term Fairglen Interchange scheme) to support delivery of strategic development proposals in the Local Plan coming forward. Additional development in this locality may then be supportable once measures proposed within the long-term scheme have been implemented.

It is for these reasons ECC seek the safeguarding of land in the vicinity of the Fairglen Interchange, to facilitate the long term improvement scheme and that there should be no new development (beyond the adopted Local Plan) in this area, in the short – medium term period. However, it is recognised there are growth pressures and if RDC do progress growth/development in this area, there will need to be a series of steps to work through with ECC and ASELA partners on this matter.

Consideration should be given to improving connectivity across the A127 and A130 SRN and rail network through crossing points to improve local connectivity for bus, walking and cycling and rail for example, within RDC and to neighbouring authorities, such as north south links across the A127 west of Rayleigh to North West Thundersley or east-west over the A130 - between Rayleigh and land east of Wickford to improve connectivity. This could be explored in relation to growth option 3c focussed West of Rayleigh, and the promoted sites within.

3. Other pinch points for consideration
In undertake a full transport network assessment consideration of the following junctions will need to take place,
• A1159 at Anne Boleyn (Southend Road / Sutton Road);
• Purdeys industrial Estate (Sutton Road);
• A127 Rayleigh Weir and Rawreth Lane;
• Warners Bridge, Southend; and
• Limited network ability for freight at Warners Bridge Southend Road, as an access point to the East of Rochford.

London Southend Airport
Any future growth to LSA will need to:
• ease connectivity to/from LSA by bus, and should improve bus connectivity to enable the airport to function as multi modal interchange for the area; and
• be supported by improvements to parts of the Strategic Routes and in particular the A127 (See Q28).

Passenger Transport (PT)
ECC is exploring a number of areas where improvements to the highways infrastructure may benefit the real time travel and accessibility of PT; these include: the Rayleigh High Street; Rayleigh Weir, Rochford Square, Ashingdon Road, Bradley Way, Anne Boleyn Junction, Southend Road, Rochford Hall Road and the potential for a multi modal interchange on the west side of Southend Road (adjacent to Southend Airport Station). To improve wider connectivity, there are a range of bus priority infrastructure and bus network improvements options available such as sustainable access corridors, dedicated bus lanes, sustainable mode only areas; bus priority areas, and bus gates. ECC wish to explore these further with RDC through the preparation of the new Local Plan, to create an inclusive and accessible PT network for new and existing communities.

In respect of the spatial strategy options there may be opportunities to secure sufficient bus service improvements through developer contributions, within the following locations through the provision of relatively small scale developments,
• Managed rural exception sites at Stambridge, Canewdon, Wallasea Island, Paglesham and Ballards Gore;
• Possible urban extensions on Stambridge Road Rochford; and on the eastern fringe of Hullbridge and lower Hockley, and
• Cumulative proposals to the north of Southend

In respect of the approach to PT accessibility scoring in the “Complete Communities Topic Paper”, which jumps from 4 buses per hour to “all others”, which distorts the PT coverage. ECC recommend more reasonable scoring would be 4+buses per hour / at least hourly / Mon-Saturday less than hourly / service only on certain day(s) of the week. Equally the approach referenced in paragraph 5.10, also provides a distorted approach between urban and rural areas.

ECC recommend that RDC explore the above further with ECC

The principles highlighted in Bus Back Better National Bus Strategy for England, should be part of the PT strategy for any proposed development site in the Local Plan including high quality, zero emission buses, integrated ticketing, and low fares. It is ECC policy for bus services to be provided in full, from the occupation of the first unit on site, dependent upon further discussions, in the early years of the construction of a development it may be more appropriate to provide an alternative Demand Responsive Transit service to serve the settlement.
The new Local Plan should fully reflect the importance to plan and make provision to improve existing bus infrastructure, network, routes and services by locating new development where is it viable in terms of public transport operation. ECC has identified a number of locations where investment in PT infrastructure could improve real-time and accessible PT services (see above), to be progressed through the draft Plan.

Rail
ECC recommend consideration is given to the influence of the rail network in any future spatial strategy, and the connectivity to key routes and stations, including the existing London to Southend Victoria railway line through the district, and other key out of district stations on the C2C line from Southend to Fenchurch Street as well as the Southminster District Line.

Cross boundary transport matters
There is a need for RDC, in consultation with ECC, to consider and explore the wider cross boundary transportation and highways matters with neighbouring authorities and with their respective Local Plans and transport evidence. ECC consider the following to be of relevance and require further consideration under the duty in the preparation of the draft Plan.
• Chelmsford – ECC can advise of the following key junctions and improvements in the vicinity of the RDC boundary include the A132 and Rettendon Turnpike, A129 (Runwell) as well as the highway improvements along the B1012, Ferrers Road and Rettendon Turnpike, and the A132 and local junctions between the South Woodham Ferrers and the A130. It is also noted that there were representations made to the Bradwell B Stage 1 consultation that investigative work would be required regarding a potential northern bypass to the new development and downgrading the existing route.
• Basildon - the submitted Local Plan proposes a number of strategic sites allocations in and around Wickford and East of Basildon, as well as a number of transport proposals and schemes. These include safeguarding the A127 corridor for transport improvements, transport schemes at the A127/Pound Lane/Cranfield Park Road junction, and in and around Wickford. Further details and updates including additional transport evidence since submission are available here. ECC consider these relevant to the RDC promoted sites within Spatial Strategy Option 3a (focussed west of Rayleigh) and within the Rawreth Community.
• Castle Point - the submitted and examined Local Plan proposes safeguarding the A127 corridor for transport for improvements, and a number of key transport schemes including dualling of the northern section of the A130 Canvey Way in the vicinity of Sadlers Farm and route improvements on the A129. It should also be noted that paragraphs 10.4 to 10.10 of Castle Point’s submitted plan identifies the area of “North West Thundersley” (in the vicinity of Fairglen Interchange) as a potential location for longer term development to be considered as part of an early local plan review. ECC is supportive of their approach in the submitted Local Plan, and this is consistent with the approach raised above in relation to the importance of the A127/A130 Fairglen interchange. Further details and updates are available on their website here. ECC consider these relevant to the RDC promoted sites within Spatial Strategy Option 3a (focussed West of Rayleigh).
• SBC – cross boundary matters including the A127 and the strategic importance of LSA - see above & Q28. ECC consider these relevant to the RDC promoted sites within Spatial Strategy Option 3b (focussed north of Southend).
Evidence base
In developing the new Local Plan, it is of critical importance that consideration be given to the potential transportation and highway impacts that the future spatial strategy and policy may incur and that appropriate mitigation is set out within the Plan to minimise impacts.

Planning for transport and access to provide high quality sustainable transport as well as allowing for potential future radical technological changes involves complex decisions. Important issues to consider include access to local services, low traffic neighbourhoods, public transport strategy, technology and transport, and electric vehicle charging. When delivering future growth, the new Local Plan should consider the impact on the transport network, and the scale of mitigation measures in the form of infrastructure and services needed to accommodate the development proposed. ECC recognises that the new Local Plan will need to have a clear understanding and robust evidence for policies that seek to develop clear modal shift targets and minimise transport trips through location of development and provision of sustainable transport options.

ECC through collaborative working, seeks to ensure the preferred spatial strategy facilitates future sustainable development and growth, but may be accommodated (where required with mitigation) on the local and strategic highway network, with the latter the responsibility of Highways England (having regard to any wider network implications and Lower Thames Crossing).

To develop an effective strategy ECC welcomes joint working on the following matters throughout the Plan preparation process.

1. Transportation and Highways modelling – ECC welcome the close work to date between RDC, SBC and ECC on the initial transport work and the next stages that are to be commissioned. To clarify, transport modelling (either undertaken by Jacobs or other consultants) will require ECC input to, and signing off, the proposed modelling methodology prior to any detailed assessment being undertaken. Any modelling outputs will also need to be agreed with ECC, as the highway authority.

Aspects to consider / address include:
o use of the South Essex Strategic model and integration with it;
o a full transport network assessment, to identify transport mitigation for junctions impacted by the Local Plan development having regard to the existing traffic pressures (see above) and to identify a transport solution which includes sustainable transport networks; and
o Site assessments and appraisals, with a need to review and update including:
- Changing the selection criteria for column 4 “distance to Rail station” from 1.1km to 800m; and
- Reassess the public transport accessibility scoring in terms of bus services within the topic paper.

2. Assessment the active and sustainable travel network (walking, cycling and bus) to support sustainable transport provision, to deliver new and enhance the networks and improving multi modal connectivity across the district, creating choices, promoting modal shift, as part of an integrated transport package to support the planned growth. ECC will need to see due consideration given to the delivery of future active travel (walking and cycling) within any proposed new community(ies) and regarding individual sites. The recommendations of the ECAC seek to prioritise active travel designing walkable and low traffic neighbourhoods, exploring built-in last mile delivery solutions (among other options), delivering Walkable Neighbourhoods and upgrading and expanding the National Cycle Network and integrating with existing local routes. This should include preparation of a LCWIP and infrastructure proposals to improve the bus network and services. It is recommended that the emphasis is expanded to recognise the need to improve and extend the networks, as part of a viable and deliverable integrated transport proposals, within and between new and existing communities within the district including links to neighbouring authorities, creating choices and promoting promote modal shift and ECC wish to explore this further with RDC.

ECC would welcome early indication of the above two points to enable internal resourcing and budgets to be considered and assigned.

3. Integrated transport solutions for the movement of people and goods, to create Safer Greener, Healthier Communities transforming active travel in Essex (for further details see here). These include ensuring,
• appropriate opportunities to promote sustainable transport modes taken up, given the type of development and its location; consideration is given to the Rochford Cycling Action Plan; and the existing bus services for example, to enhance and develop the existing active and sustainable transport network, creating choices to transform connectivity within and between existing and new communities within Rochford and neighbouring areas; and
• safe and suitable access to allocated sites can be achieved for all users. ECC can advise on these matters against ECC standards including on highway design and transport matters relating to new developments; the Highways Technical Manual and Streets and Roads guide, and the Essex Parking Standards are currently being reviewed by the EPOA. A draft is expected to undergo a consultation in Autumn 2021.

4. Cost effective mitigation. Any significant impacts from the development on the transport network (in terms of capacity and congestion), or on highway safety, can be cost effectively mitigated to an acceptable degree.

In developing the preferred spatial strategy and site allocations, consideration should be given to the following:
• Placing emphasis on “movement” rather than traffic; what the movement requirements are, generated by the development and how can these be addressed.
• How new developments will connect and link to existing communities and services and how will they be integrated into the existing settlement, and should seek to avoid creating additional severance. For example, urban extensions need to be connected into the existing town.
• Designing developments to minimise the car traffic they generate – to understand transport requirements we need to understand what will be built.
• How any new proposed roads should be part of an integrated transportation solution - certain types of trip are likely to require a car, or access by van or truck for the movement of freight, as well as buses and provision for active and sustainable travel link.
• Recognising new roads will still be required, however, such investment forms part of a wider transport package integrated with the delivery of defined outcomes, for the connectivity and movement of people and goods.
• The movement of goods and freight within and through Rochford district.
• How new and larger developments are designed to actively promote modal shift through active and sustainable travel and passenger transport provision, promoting walkable neighbourhoods and traffic free areas. Larger scale developments be it extensions or new settlements should not be self-contained and should integrate with the existing communities.
• Delivery and funding mechanisms to finance transportation mitigation and improvements, with developer contributions and consideration on phasing, implementation and delivery, and funding bids to forward finance early delivery of the infrastructure “as loans” to be recovered through developer contributions. Other funding streams such as CIL may also be appropriate.
• Engage and work collaboratively on the development of a joint evidence base to inform the new Local Plan and future highways and transportation policy for Essex, and south Essex in partnership with ASELA, and the A127 Task Force, as well as Transport East.

Existing Network
In preparing a proposed spatial strategy, ECC is already aware of the following potential pinch points along the highway and transportation routes from, to and within the district and South Essex.
1. A127 Strategic Road Network (SRN), proposals are outlined A127 Corridor for Growth - An Economic Plan 2014 (A127 Route Management Strategy), recognises the strategic importance of this transport corridor for south Essex and an essential access point for RDC and SBC)residents and businesses. An A127 Task Force has been established to co-ordinate transport requirements within the A127 corridor, formed by ECC and partners (including ECC, ASELA, London Borough of Havering and Highways England/National Highways.
ECC recommend RDC recognise the importance of the A127 and for safeguarding the corridor within the district to facilitate transport improvements schemes in accordance with the A127 Route Management Strategy. ECC’s specific proposal for safeguarding the route within the Local Plan is made below.

There is a need for ECC to explore cross boundary transportation matters with RDC and SBC, noting both RDC’s current Local Plan consultation and SBC’s current emerging Local Plan consultation which include growth and development proposals that would span the boundary of RDC and SBC, located north of Southend (RDC Spatial Strategy Option 3b). This will need to cover future growth options for LSA; and any highway proposals to open access to this land in the vicinity of the airport, within and across the Southend administrative boundary and reflect and protect them as part of the Local Plan proposals.

2. A127/A130 Fairglen Interchange. The interchange is of strategic importance to the existing and future transport movements in South Essex (including the A13, A127 and A130; with linkages to A12, M25 and Lower Thames Crossing, as well as the A1245). There is a committed and funded short term scheme for the Fairglen Interchange where construction will start soon. However, a long-term scheme is required to deliver longer term growth across South Essex beyond 2036 and to address highway capacity, safety, routing and junction performance issues. This will need also need to include active and sustainable solutions to enhance provision and connectivity in the area. An initial concept drawing for the long-term scheme has been produced (available here) but funding has yet to be secured. ECC recommend that the long term scheme is recognised as part of the strategic context of the draft Plan and growth would positively contribute to any future business case

The Fairglen Interchange should be considered in the wider strategic context taking into account the long term Local Plan housing, employment and infrastructure requirements across South Essex and in particular Rochford, Basildon, Castle Point and Southend local authority areas, and the cumulative impact of their growth on the SRN (in particular the A13, A127 and A130 and the A1245). Any development proposals in this locality should facilitate and not prejudice any long-term scheme for not only Fairglen, but the relationships, linkages, and impacts with cross boundary development and other major transport schemes and proposals, such as those arising from the A127 Task Force and Lower Thames Crossing and their phasing and delivery programmes. The sustainable transport network will also form part of these considerations including walking, cycling and bus rapid transit.

The Department for Transport (DfT) and Highways England/National Highways have proposed and consulted on the Lower Thames Crossing. While the Lower Thames Crossing is not yet firmly committed, it is assumed the high priority given to this project by Government, that it will be constructed during the new Local Plan period. Construction will have an impact on traffic patterns and volumes on the SRN (A13, A127, A130). Further work is required to fully understand the impacts of the Lower Thames Crossing and whether construction provides an opportunity to make a case for early investment in the A13, A127 and A130 (for example the long term Fairglen Interchange scheme) to support delivery of strategic development proposals in the Local Plan coming forward. Additional development in this locality may then be supportable once measures proposed within the long-term scheme have been implemented.

It is for these reasons ECC seek the safeguarding of land in the vicinity of the Fairglen Interchange, to facilitate the long term improvement scheme and that there should be no new development (beyond the adopted Local Plan) in this area, in the short – medium term period. However, it is recognised there are growth pressures and if RDC do progress growth/development in this area, there will need to be a series of steps to work through with ECC and ASELA partners on this matter.

Consideration should be given to improving connectivity across the A127 and A130 SRN and rail network through crossing points to improve local connectivity for bus, walking and cycling and rail for example, within RDC and to neighbouring authorities, such as north south links across the A127 west of Rayleigh to North West Thundersley or east-west over the A130 - between Rayleigh and land east of Wickford to improve connectivity. This could be explored in relation to growth option 3c focussed West of Rayleigh, and the promoted sites within.

3. Other pinch points for consideration
In undertake a full transport network assessment consideration of the following junctions will need to take place,
• A1159 at Anne Boleyn (Southend Road / Sutton Road);
• Purdeys industrial Estate (Sutton Road);
• A127 Rayleigh Weir and Rawreth Lane;
• Warners Bridge, Southend; and
• Limited network ability for freight at Warners Bridge Southend Road, as an access point to the East of Rochford.

London Southend Airport
Any future growth to LSA will need to:
• ease connectivity to/from LSA by bus, and should improve bus connectivity to enable the airport to function as multi modal interchange for the area; and
• be supported by improvements to parts of the Strategic Routes and in particular the A127 (See Q28).

Passenger Transport (PT)
ECC is exploring a number of areas where improvements to the highways infrastructure may benefit the real time travel and accessibility of PT; these include: the Rayleigh High Street; Rayleigh Weir, Rochford Square, Ashingdon Road, Bradley Way, Anne Boleyn Junction, Southend Road, Rochford Hall Road and the potential for a multi modal interchange on the west side of Southend Road (adjacent to Southend Airport Station). To improve wider connectivity, there are a range of bus priority infrastructure and bus network improvements options available such as sustainable access corridors, dedicated bus lanes, sustainable mode only areas; bus priority areas, and bus gates. ECC wish to explore these further with RDC through the preparation of the new Local Plan, to create an inclusive and accessible PT network for new and existing communities.

In respect of the spatial strategy options there may be opportunities to secure sufficient bus service improvements through developer contributions, within the following locations through the provision of relatively small scale developments,
• Managed rural exception sites at Stambridge, Canewdon, Wallasea Island, Paglesham and Ballards Gore;
• Possible urban extensions on Stambridge Road Rochford; and on the eastern fringe of Hullbridge and lower Hockley, and
• Cumulative proposals to the north of Southend

In respect of the approach to PT accessibility scoring in the “Complete Communities Topic Paper”, which jumps from 4 buses per hour to “all others”, which distorts the PT coverage. ECC recommend more reasonable scoring would be 4+buses per hour / at least hourly / Mon-Saturday less than hourly / service only on certain day(s) of the week. Equally the approach referenced in paragraph 5.10, also provides a distorted approach between urban and rural areas.

ECC recommend that RDC explore the above further with ECC

The principles highlighted in Bus Back Better National Bus Strategy for England, should be part of the PT strategy for any proposed development site in the Local Plan including high quality, zero emission buses, integrated ticketing, and low fares. It is ECC policy for bus services to be provided in full, from the occupation of the first unit on site, dependent upon further discussions, in the early years of the construction of a development it may be more appropriate to provide an alternative Demand Responsive Transit service to serve the settlement.

The new Local Plan should fully reflect the importance to plan and make provision to improve existing bus infrastructure, network, routes and services by locating new development where is it viable in terms of public transport operation. ECC has identified a number of locations where investment in PT infrastructure could improve real-time and accessible PT services (see above), to be progressed through the draft Plan.

Rail
ECC recommend consideration is given to the influence of the rail network in any future spatial strategy, and the connectivity to key routes and stations, including the existing London to Southend Victoria railway line through the district, and other key out of district stations on the C2C line from Southend to Fenchurch Street as well as the Southminster District Line.

Cross boundary transport matters
There is a need for RDC, in consultation with ECC, to consider and explore the wider cross boundary transportation and highways matters with neighbouring authorities and with their respective Local Plans and transport evidence. ECC consider the following to be of relevance and require further consideration under the duty in the preparation of the draft Plan.
• Chelmsford – ECC can advise of the following key junctions and improvements in the vicinity of the RDC boundary include the A132 and Rettendon Turnpike, A129 (Runwell) as well as the highway improvements along the B1012, Ferrers Road and Rettendon Turnpike, and the A132 and local junctions between the South Woodham Ferrers and the A130. It is also noted that there were representations made to the Bradwell B Stage 1 consultation that investigative work would be required regarding a potential northern bypass to the new development and downgrading the existing route.
• Basildon - the submitted Local Plan proposes a number of strategic sites allocations in and around Wickford and East of Basildon, as well as a number of transport proposals and schemes. These include safeguarding the A127 corridor for transport improvements, transport schemes at the A127/Pound Lane/Cranfield Park Road junction, and in and around Wickford. Further details and updates including additional transport evidence since submission are available here. ECC consider these relevant to the RDC promoted sites within Spatial Strategy Option 3a (focussed west of Rayleigh) and within the Rawreth Community.
• Castle Point - the submitted and examined Local Plan proposes safeguarding the A127 corridor for transport for improvements, and a number of key transport schemes including dualling of the northern section of the A130 Canvey Way in the vicinity of Sadlers Farm and route improvements on the A129. It should also be noted that paragraphs 10.4 to 10.10 of Castle Point’s submitted plan identifies the area of “North West Thundersley” (in the vicinity of Fairglen Interchange) as a potential location for longer term development to be considered as part of an early local plan review. ECC is supportive of their approach in the submitted Local Plan, and this is consistent with the approach raised above in relation to the importance of the A127/A130 Fairglen interchange. Further details and updates are available on their website here. ECC consider these relevant to the RDC promoted sites within Spatial Strategy Option 3a (focussed West of Rayleigh).
• SBC – cross boundary matters including the A127 and the strategic importance of LSA - see above & Q28. ECC consider these relevant to the RDC promoted sites within Spatial Strategy Option 3b (focussed north of Southend).
• Consideration of a Bus Rapid Transit system, and evolution towards a SERT (South Essex Rapid Transit) network, as part wider network improvements in South Essex. ECC will seek to explore this further with RDC and ASELA partners so that it can be reflected in their local plans as it progresses.

Other matters
• Transport Environment - ECC supports the integration of the “15-minute neighbourhood’ concept, with walkable neighbourhoods and emphasis on designing for low traffic neighbourhoods where pedestrians and cyclists are prioritised over vehicles. Consideration should also be given to where car clubs may be suitable.
• Travel Plans - ECC welcomes Travel Plans for all land uses, ideally as an over-arching development-wide plan, and will be required as an important tool for influencing travel behaviour from the outset, and should set clear ambitious targets, supported by a detailed monitoring programme with identified actions and provision of necessary funding.
• Air Quality Management Area at Rayleigh, and the Rayleigh Action Plan, will need to be considered.
• A127 Air Quality Directive (see here for details) will need to be considered.
• Walkable schools/school streets/school zones –ECC would recommend RDC incorporate ECC’s preferred approach/ design principles to “The environment around schools” in any new developments, as set out in section 5.2.8 of ECC Developers’ Guide. This aligns with the Essex Design Guide and to promote sustainable and active travel (cycling and walking) and then bus use with a view to limiting car use and where possible removing traffic entirely from the area around the school, particularly at school start times and day end. Therefore, the immediate area around school entrances, which may not form part of secured school site, should, where possible, be traffic free. Such pedestrianised areas also function as a space for children themselves, parents and younger siblings to congregate safely at the beginning and end of the school day and thereby encourage a sense of community. Such spaces should be well connected to walking and cycling routes and local bus routes to make sustainable modes of travel attractive and help support health and wellbeing through active travel to and from school. An ECC Strategy document is being prepared as well as measures linked with the Safer, Greener, Healthier initiative. This includes the results of the Active Travel Fund Consultation Report 2021 which will have synergies with the Rochford district..

Wider Strategic Context
The preparation of the new Local Plan will need to have consideration to the wider strategic context and engagement including national strategy, Transport East and ASELA, as well as the county context set out in this section. For example,

• National. ECC welcome the approach to “hierarchy” approach to transport and the recognition of the need for a stepped change and transformational approach within the Spatial Options. The role and importance of the Local Plan is critical to deliver this, and this point will need to be developed further as plan preparation continues.

National transportation and highways policy has a clear role in meeting the challenge of climate change and place making, with an increased focus on meeting decarbonisation, sustainability and creating attractive places to live and work. ECC through the ECAC and is seeking to address these challenges at the local level, with regard to the following national policies, strategies and guidance.
o Decarbonising Transport: a better, greener Britain (2021)
o Future of Mobility: Urban Strategy 2019 and the emerging complementary Rural Strategy
o Gear Change, the Cycling and Walking plan for England, and new guidance on the design of cycle infrastructure
o Bus Back Better and the Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail - new approaches to rail and bus
o Future Telecoms Infrastructure Review (2018) how telecommunications networks will be the enabling infrastructure that drives future economic growth.
o The Government’s Industrial Strategy that has been transitioned in to the Plan for Growth sets out a series of grand challenges including future of mobility and clean growth; and zero emission vehicles by 2030.
o Transitioning to zero emission cars and vans: 2035 delivery plan

• ECC is working with Transport East, Highways England/National Highways, Network Rail, ASELA and other local authorities to provide a strategic direction for future transport within the east. Transport East is developing a strategy for transport to 2050 and a public consultation on the strategy is expected in 2021. Transport East acknowledges key priorities as follows: climate action; decarbonisation; electrification; economic growth and jobs; housing; levelling up. ECC notes that Transport East is emphasising the role that rural areas will play in any future strategy, in terms of their economy and accessibility of local communities, which is important to Rochford district. The ongoing work and outcomes should be reflected in the Plan preparation and ECC will liaise with RDC

• South Essex. ECC through involvement with ASELA, Opportunity South Essex and the A127 Taskforce, and Highways England/National Highways and Network Rail and partners are seeking investment in the transportation and highways networks, and the development of transport solutions to serve South Essex to 2050. The ongoing work and outcomes should be reflected in the Plan preparation and ECC will liaise with RDC

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q52. Are there areas where improvements to transport connections are needed?

Representation ID: 40440

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

See ECC’s responses to Q23 and Q51.
The section should be expanded to consider digital connectivity, and ECC recommend specific policies are included with in the new Local Plan to seek the provision of digital infrastructure within all new developments (see Q23).
For example, ultra-fast broadband, and the funding through the Local Full Fibre Network, to secure the deployment of the supporting infrastructure and mobile digital technology for full district coverage, to support a full range of future technologies to every part of the district to support inward investment and hybrid/home working. RDC should continue to promote the Government’s next broadband programme; and refer to the BT Open Reach policy for providing broadband Fibre to the Premises (FTTP) connections on new developments of houses of 30+units, free of charge to the developer.
IDP. A range of integrated transport proposals should be developed and explored based upon the additional transport evidence and information as the preferred strategy for the new Local Plan is prepared. The transportation requirements will need to be viable and deliverable, with developer funding. To the end, ECC will work with RDC in developing the IDP to set out a sustainable network across the district as well as linked new and existing communities.

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q53. With reference to your preferred Strategy Option, are there opportunities for growth to deliver new transport connections, such as link roads or rapid transit? What routes and modes should these take? [walking, cycling, rail, bus, road etc.]

Representation ID: 40441

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

See ECC response in Q6 and Q51. ECC wish to explore this further with RDC.

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q54. Do you feel that the plan should identify rural exception sites? If so, where should these be located and what forms of housing or employment do you feel need to be provided?

Representation ID: 40442

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

See ECC response to Q51

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Q55. Are there any other ways that you feel the plan should be planning for the needs of rural communities?

Representation ID: 40444

Received: 22/09/2021

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

Education. Some small rural schools may benefit from limited growth in their area. For example, Canewdon Endowed CE Primary has 6 class bases and offers up to 22 places per year which means, even when full, mixed age classes are required. The school potentially has site area to become one-form entry (30 places per year group) with appropriate additional accommodation. A feasibility study could be commissioned if development is proposed in this area.

Full text:

ECC Response to Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation July 2021

Thank you for consulting Essex County Council (ECC) on the Rochford New Local Plan: Spatial Options Consultation (SOC) published in July 2021. ECC has engaged with Rochford District Council (RDC) in the preparation of the new Local Plan, and our involvement to date has been proportionate at this early stage of plan preparation, building on the Issues and Options consultation in 2017/18. Once prepared, the new Local Plan will include the required strategies, policies and site proposals to guide future planning across the District, and will replace the current suite of adopted Development Plans up to 2040.

ECC welcomes the opportunity to review and comment on the emerging new Local Plan vision, strategic priorities and objectives, initial growth scenarios, spatial options, thematic themes and ‘Planning for Complete Communities’. As Plan preparation continues, ECC is committed to working with RDC through regular and on-going focussed collaborative discussions to prepare evidence that ensures the preferred spatial strategy, policies and site allocations are sound, viable and deliverable, where future development is aligned to the provision of required local and strategic infrastructure.

A Local Plan can provide a platform from which to secure a sustainable economic, social and environmental future to the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors. A robust long-term strategy will provide a reliable basis on which RDC, ECC and its partners may plan and provide the services and required infrastructure for which they are responsible. To this end, ECC will use its best endeavours to assist on strategic and cross-boundary matters under the duty to cooperate (Duty), including engagement and co-operation with other organisations for which those issues may have relevance.

It is acknowledged that RDC has engaged ECC under the Duty, during the past year, in addition to the joint and regular meetings established with the South Essex authorities, through specific South Essex strategic planning duty to co-operate groups for Members and Officers respectively to explore strategic and cross boundary matters.

ECC interest in the Rochford New Local Plan – spatial options consultation
ECC aims to ensure that local policies and related strategies provide the greatest benefit to deliver a buoyant economy for the existing and future population that lives, works, visits not only in Rochford District, but Essex as a whole. This includes a balance of land-uses to create great places for all communities, and businesses across all sectors; and that the developer funding for the required infrastructure is clear and explicit. As a result, ECC is keen to understand, inform, support and help refine the formulation of the development strategy and policies delivered by LPAs within and adjoining Essex. Involvement is necessary and beneficial because of ECC’s roles as:
a. the highway and transport authority, including responsibility for the delivery of the Essex Local Transport Plan; the lead authority for education including early years and childcare (EYCC), Special Education Needs and Disabilities, and Post 16 education; Minerals and Waste Planning Authority; Lead Local Flood Authority; lead advisors on public health;
and adult social care in relation to the securing the right housing mix which takes account of the housing needs of older people and adults with disabilities;
b. an infrastructure funding partner, that seeks to ensure that development proposed is realistic and does not place an unnecessary (or unacceptable) cost burden on the public purse, and specifically ECC’s Capital Programme;
c. major provider and commissioner of a wide range of local government services throughout the county (and where potential cross boundary impacts need to be considered);
d. Advocate of the Essex Climate Action Commissioner’s (ECAC) Report 2021 Net Zero – Making Essex Carbon Neutral providing advice and recommendations for action on climate change mitigation and adaption including setting planning policies which minimise carbon. This work has been tailored for use in the county of Essex; and
e. involvement through the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) and Opportunity South Essex Partnership (OSE), promoting economic development, regeneration, infrastructure delivery and new development throughout the County.

In accordance with the Duty, ECC will contribute cooperatively to the preparation of a new Rochford Local Plan, particularly within the following broad subject areas,
• Evidence base. Guidance with assembly and interpretation of the evidence base both for strategic/cross-boundary projects, for example, education provision and transport studies and modelling, and wider work across South Essex as part of the joint strategic plan.
• ECC assets and services. Where relevant, advice on the current status of assets and services and the likely impact and implications of proposals in the emerging Local Plan for the future operation and delivery of ECC services.
• Sub-regional and broader context. Assistance with identification of relevant information and its fit with broader strategic initiatives, and assessments of how emerging proposals for the District may impact on areas beyond and vice-versa.
• Policy development. Contributions on the relationship of the evidence base with the structure and content of emerging policies and proposals.
• Inter-relationship between Local Plans. Including the Essex Minerals Local Plan (2014) and the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Waste Local Plan (2017).

To achieve this, ECC seeks a formal structure for regular and ongoing engagement with RDC through the next stage of Plan preparation. Of critical importance is the additional evidence required for the site assessment process at both the individual and cumulative level to refine and develop the spatial strategy, which will be informed by the provision of sustainable and deliverable infrastructure and services at the right scale, location and time, for the existing and future residents of Rochford. There are also challenges arising from COVID-19 and how these can be addressed through the Local Plan and the future growth ambitions for London Southend Airport.

Key issues and messages of the ECC response
The ECC requirements are set within the context of national policy and ECC’s organisation plan proposals within “Everyone’s Essex” and commitments for “Renewal, Ambition and Equality” based on ECC’s strategies, policies, objectives and evidence base. The ECC response therefore identifies where we support emerging options and proposals, and where we recommend further work and engagement with ECC in order to refine and inform the “Preferred Options”, the next iteration of the local plan preparation, scheduled for consultation in Spring 2022. The key messages in ECC’s response are summarised below.
1. ECC support RDC preparing a new Local Plan and will assist with the preparation of sound evidence and policies, that plan for long term sustainable infrastructure delivery.
2. It is still too early for ECC to provide detailed comments on the impacts, opportunities and requirements for the full range of ECC infrastructure and services, and additional evidence is required on a range of matters to inform the selection of a preferred strategy and sites, together with supporting policies. It is acknowledged that ECC has engaged with RDC on the preparation of the transport evidence base to date, which has been proportionate to this stage of plan preparation.
3. The preferred strategy and site allocations will need to ensure that the requirements of ECC infrastructure and services are met to secure their sound, viable and sustainable delivery at the right scale, location and time, that is commensurate with housing needs and growth aspirations.
4. This will include engagement with preparing additional evidence, that will include, but is not limited to,
o Transportation modelling (including sustainable transport) to develop a strategy to realise modal shift including analysis of existing active and sustainable travel infrastructure (including bus network and services). In collaboration with ECC, it is recommended that RDC prepare a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
o Scenario testing for education provision including early years and childcare and the approach to Special Education Needs with Disabilities provision.
o Minerals and waste policy compliant assessments.
o Flood and water management assessments through revised Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) and revisions to the South Essex Water Management Action Plan.
o Economic need and employment evidence including an up to date Economic Development Needs Assessment to refine the level of economic growth to be planned for.
o ECC will also contribute to the evidence in respect of skills, Adult Social Care, Public Health, climate change, and green and blue infrastructure to that can deliver safer, greener, healthier communities.
o There is also benefit in undertaking a Health Impact Assessment to ensure health and wellbeing is comprehensively considered and integrated into the Local Plan, including a strategic health and wellbeing policy, an area where ECC can advise and assist, and one successfully implemented and included in other plans across Essex.
5. RDC will need to engage and work closely with ECC to inform site selection and the range of preferred sites both individually and cumulatively, having regard to the evidence.
6. Spatial Growth Scenarios – the preferred scenario should meet national policy to deliver housing and other growth requirements; climate change resilience and adaptation; and environmental aspirations of RDC. As a minimum, the standard methodology should be met and any buffer to drive local economic growth or address unmet need from elsewhere is supported but will need to be based on sound evidence.
7. Spatial Strategy Options – the spatial strategy option to proportionately spread growth across the district would not deliver the necessary scale of growth to secure the viable and sustainable delivery of local or strategic infrastructure and services (most notably a secondary school) and would not be supported. Based on the information presented in the SOC, a preferable option is likely to see a combination of the options presented resulting in urban intensification, a focus on main towns, and concentrated growth in one or more locations (resulting in a new neighbourhood the size of a larger village or small town). The option will need to be informed by the evidence base and further site assessments.
8. ECC will need to be involved in any cross boundary development proposals. To this end, Option 3a would need to be delivered in the longer term given current constraints of the strategic road network (Fairglen Interchange) and have regard to emerging proposals and aspirations arising in Basildon and Castle Point Boroughs; and Option 3b will require close and formal working arrangements with Southend-on-Sea Borough Council.
9. It is noted that several of ECC’s comments and observations made in response to the Issues and Options consultation from 2017/18 continue to apply, given the early stages of Plan preparation. We therefore reiterate where important our previous comments and additional points where this is necessary to do so.

The ECC response is set out in table from page 5 onwards and reflects the order of the SOC paper including responses to specific questions; the Integrated Impact Assessment; supporting Topic Papers; and Site Appraisal Paper.

[Due to tabular format of submission, please refer to attached documents for full submission]

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.