Issues and Options Document
Search representations
Results for Rayleigh Town Council search
New searchSupport
Issues and Options Document
B. Retain the current policies on the Coastal Protection Belt
Representation ID: 35142
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Option B
Option B
Support
Issues and Options Document
A. Retain the existing policies
Representation ID: 35143
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Option A
Option A
Support
Issues and Options Document
How do we promote good design and building efficiency for new homes and commercial premises in the future?
Representation ID: 35144
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
We question whether there is any justification for doing this. Why not just follow the national guidelines, Essex Design Guide, and building regulations?
We question whether there is any justification for doing this. Why not just follow the national guidelines, Essex Design Guide, and building regulations?
Support
Issues and Options Document
A. Retain the existing policies on design.
Representation ID: 35145
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Option A
Option A
Support
Issues and Options Document
K. Do not have a policy on energy efficiency standards for conversions, extensions and alterations to existing homes.
Representation ID: 35146
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Option K
Option K
Comment
Issues and Options Document
How do we manage air quality issues in the future across the district?
Representation ID: 35147
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
You may as well stay with option A since options B and C will make no difference. I previously submitted a much more comprehensive plan for traffic management in the centre of Rayleigh which does address the congestion and air quality hot spots.
None of the actions proposed will make a significant difference to air quality. The biggest improvement will come from the gradual replacement of older vehicles with new ones built to a higher emissions standard and, ultimately, the introduction of hybrid and electric vehicles.
If you want to do anything in a faster time frame than that then steps must be taken to: reduce traffic congestion; avoid building new homes in areas that are already congested; build new homes in areas where the air quality is good.
You may as well stay with option A since options B and C will make no difference. I previously submitted a much more comprehensive plan for traffic management in the centre of Rayleigh which does address the congestion and air quality hot spots.
Comment
Issues and Options Document
F. Retain the current affordable homes split (80% social and 20% intermediate) where a scheme meets the prescribed threshold
Representation ID: 35148
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
What happened to options A to E
What happened to options A to E
Comment
Issues and Options Document
How do we plan for the demand for self-build and custom-build plots over the next 20 years?
Representation ID: 35149
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
New builds are zero rated but everything they buy will have VAT on it. The only way to claim back the VAT is to form a company and register it for VAT but that is difficult when it has no trading history and will only complete one project. This is all for central government to sort out, not local councils.
You are making a mountain out of a molehill on this. No policy is needed. Anyone wishing to self build will have to find a plot of land first. They will then have to apply for planning permission and meet building regulations the same as anybody else would. All the council has to do is NOT to discriminate against such applications. From the self-builders point of view, negotiating the VAT maze is far more of a problem. New builds are zero rated but everything they buy will have VAT on it. The only way to claim back the VAT is to form a company and register it for VAT but that is difficult when it has no trading history and will only complete one project. This is all for central government to sort out, not local councils.
Support
Issues and Options Document
D. Do not have a policy on self-build or custom-build plots.
Representation ID: 35150
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Option D
Option D
Comment
Issues and Options Document
How do we address rural exception sites which aim to provide affordable homes to meet local housing needs in rural Green Belt areas?
Representation ID: 35151
Received: 02/03/2018
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
There is no point in wasting time and effort worrying about a situation that has not arisen yet and may not arise. Since there are so many possible variables in the circumstances any such policy would have to be extremely comprehensive. Wait until a planning application is made and then assess it on its merits. If there is no formal policy in place then this would have to be debated by the Development Committee. You could meet the NPPF requirement by putting a reference to rural exception sites on the council's website.
Paragraph 11.16 "with the publication of the Housing White Paper in February 2017 the definition of what constitutes affordable homes could be amended" This is clearly out of date and needs updating. Was the paper published last year? Was the definition amended?
There is no point in wasting time and effort worrying about a situation that has not arisen yet and may not arise. Since there are so many possible variables in the circumstances any such policy would have to be extremely comprehensive. Wait until a planning application is made and then assess it on its merits. If there is no formal policy in place then this would have to be debated by the Development Committee. You could meet the NPPF requirement by putting a reference to rural exception sites on the council's website.