4. Proposals plan, shopping frontages and sites
Support
Rayleigh Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 33535
Received: 25/02/2014
Respondent: Mr Richard Shorter
In section 4.2 the words "However there are uses of which the provision of additional units in Hockley centre would not be considered to positively contribute to the overall offer of the centre." refer to Hockley. Hello? Anybody there? This action plan is about Rayleigh. not Hockley. Please replace "Hockley" with "Rayleigh".
In section 4.2 the words "However there are uses of which the provision of additional units in Hockley centre would not be considered to positively contribute to the overall offer of the centre." refer to Hockley. Hello? Anybody there? This action plan is about Rayleigh. not Hockley. Please replace "Hockley" with "Rayleigh".
Object
Rayleigh Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 34276
Received: 27/02/2014
Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The wording in Section 4.2 'however there are uses of which the provision of additional units in Hockley centre...' is incorrect.
Rayleigh Town Council advises that this action plan is about Rayleigh.
The wording in Section 4.2 'however there are uses of which the provision of additional units in Hockley centre...' is incorrect.
Rayleigh Town Council advises that this action plan is about Rayleigh.
Object
Rayleigh Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 34287
Received: 03/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs J Bivens
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
There are already over 40 pubs, restaurants, clubs, cafes and take-aways. To allow any more would be detrimental to the idea of a 'family friendly' town cetnre. Rayleigh is, after all, a market town.
There are already over 40 pubs, restaurants, clubs, cafes and take-aways. To allow any more would be detrimental to the idea of a 'family friendly' town cetnre. Rayleigh is, after all, a market town.