Moving forward the Allocations Development Plan Document Process
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19640
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: Mr H Snell
Agent: Capita Symonds
The timetable for preparing the Allocations DPD should consider whether additional consultation during Regulation 25 is required in the event of changes being made to the submitted Core Strategy so that a fuller range of reasonable site allocation options can be tested prior to pre-submission publication.
The timetable for preparing the Allocations DPD should consider whether additional consultation during Regulation 25 is required in the event of changes being made to the submitted Core Strategy so that a fuller range of reasonable site allocation options can be tested prior to pre-submission publication.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19687
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Anthony Edwards
My objection is based on loss of local wildlife, loss of natural greenbelt land, lack of road infrastructure, increased traffic, (I live on the London Road and traffic is already very busy, I have 3 young children and often worry about them), oversubscribed schooling/ Doctors surgery, increased crime / anti-social activity that works hand in hand with increased house dwellings within compact area.
My objection is based on loss of local wildlife, loss of natural greenbelt land, lack of road infrastructure, increased traffic, (I live on the London Road and traffic is already very busy, I have 3 young children and often worry about them), oversubscribed schooling/ Doctors surgery, increased crime / anti-social activity that works hand in hand with increased house dwellings within compact area.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19737
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Mr M Wheeler
Although one hopes that the consultation process is truly objective, previous consultations have tended to support the council's point of view. Without an independent review one never really knows how accurately all views are represented especially as it would appear that we are dependent on those who have prepared the plan to report unbiasedly on the comments they receive. In truth this seems a tall order. More information on how comments are reviewed and reported on would be appreciated.
Although one hopes that the consultation process is truly objective, previous consultations have tended to support the council's point of view. Without an independent review one never really knows how accurately all views are represented especially as it would appear that we are dependent on those who have prepared the plan to report unbiasedly on the comments they receive. In truth this seems a tall order. More information on how comments are reviewed and reported on would be appreciated.