Do you agree with the community facilities proposed to be safeguarded?
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17953
Received: 13/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Paul Sealey
Whilst I do not disagree with any of the locations listed, I believe that there are numerous other location in the district and may be new facilities in the future.Maintaining a list of 'approved' community facilities would be unnecessarily onerous and would not give the clarity needed by both developers and the community.
Whilst I do not disagree with any of the locations listed, I believe that there are numerous other location in the district and may be new facilities in the future.Maintaining a list of 'approved' community facilities would be unnecessarily onerous and would not give the clarity needed by both developers and the community.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18720
Received: 12/05/2010
Respondent: Hockley Parish Council
We would like added The Old Fire Station, Massive Youth Project and Bullwood Hall.
We would like added The Old Fire Station, Massive Youth Project and Bullwood Hall.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 24004
Received: 23/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Gary Congram
Yes I agree however there are some sites missing:-
1. Hullbridge Day Centre
2. Hullbridge Library
3. Riverside Medical Centre
4. Hullbridge Garden Association
5. Hullbridge Car Park
6. Hullbridge Scout Hut
7. St Thomas's Church, Hullbridge
8. Hullbridge Free Church
Objection to development planned for Hullbridge.
No statement or cross reference to specific pages that show the impact of developments to the following:-
Local Telephone Exchange
Buses
Local Medical Centres
Local Junior/Infants School
Local Community Centre
Local pre-schools
Local Post Office
Local sorting office
Secondary Schools
Allotment space
Local Leisure Centre
Local shops
Pubs and clubs
Railway station
Electricity supply for (homes, street lighting)
Water supply (inparticular connectivity to existing varied systems)
Sewage treatment works
Drainage systems (in particular connectivity to existing varied systems)
River Crouch /Roach (surface and sewage overflows?)
Surrounding farmers fields
Existing properties
Local Fire Brigade
Local Police
Local Ambulance Service
Recycling centre
Refuse collections
Flooding issues
Detailed response provided, including various questions raised; please see paper copy for further details and appendices.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 24392
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Mr K W Randall
Option CF1 approach to the safeguarding of community facilities.
Agree with the community facilities proposed to be safeguarded plus
Hockley Parish Hall
Hockley Public Hall
Massive Youth Project
Various questions and comments received.
For further details see paper copy.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 25336
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Weir
Number of people: 2
We believe that those listed in figure 5.2 must be safeguarded along with Hawkwell Village Hall and East Hawkwell, Ashingdon Hall.
Suggest a new development in West Rayleigh to accommodate Rochford's housing allocation should be provided in a new village to take advantage from the highway network of A127, A130 and A1245 where all the infrastructure can be provided in a phased manner without compromising existing settlements.
Various comments received, for further details see paper copy.