Do you agree with the open spaces proposed to be safeguarded?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17384

Received: 20/03/2010

Respondent: Mr Ron Sadler

Representation Summary:

yes, but the list is not comprehensive enough.

Full text:

yes, but the list is not comprehensive enough.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 24000

Received: 23/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Gary Congram

Representation Summary:

I agree with the open spaces but the following should be added:-

1. Hullbridge Car Park
2. Battlesbridge Village Green

Full text:

Objection to development planned for Hullbridge.

No statement or cross reference to specific pages that show the impact of developments to the following:-

Local Telephone Exchange
Buses
Local Medical Centres
Local Junior/Infants School
Local Community Centre
Local pre-schools
Local Post Office
Local sorting office
Secondary Schools
Allotment space
Local Leisure Centre
Local shops
Pubs and clubs
Railway station
Electricity supply for (homes, street lighting)
Water supply (inparticular connectivity to existing varied systems)
Sewage treatment works
Drainage systems (in particular connectivity to existing varied systems)
River Crouch /Roach (surface and sewage overflows?)
Surrounding farmers fields
Existing properties
Local Fire Brigade
Local Police
Local Ambulance Service
Recycling centre
Refuse collections
Flooding issues

Detailed response provided, including various questions raised; please see paper copy for further details and appendices.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 24391

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Mr K W Randall

Representation Summary:

Agree that the open spaces proposed should be safeguarded.

Full text:

Various questions and comments received.

For further details see paper copy.