Do you agree with the open spaces proposed to be safeguarded?
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17384
Received: 20/03/2010
Respondent: Mr Ron Sadler
yes, but the list is not comprehensive enough.
yes, but the list is not comprehensive enough.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 24000
Received: 23/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Gary Congram
I agree with the open spaces but the following should be added:-
1. Hullbridge Car Park
2. Battlesbridge Village Green
Objection to development planned for Hullbridge.
No statement or cross reference to specific pages that show the impact of developments to the following:-
Local Telephone Exchange
Buses
Local Medical Centres
Local Junior/Infants School
Local Community Centre
Local pre-schools
Local Post Office
Local sorting office
Secondary Schools
Allotment space
Local Leisure Centre
Local shops
Pubs and clubs
Railway station
Electricity supply for (homes, street lighting)
Water supply (inparticular connectivity to existing varied systems)
Sewage treatment works
Drainage systems (in particular connectivity to existing varied systems)
River Crouch /Roach (surface and sewage overflows?)
Surrounding farmers fields
Existing properties
Local Fire Brigade
Local Police
Local Ambulance Service
Recycling centre
Refuse collections
Flooding issues
Detailed response provided, including various questions raised; please see paper copy for further details and appendices.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 24391
Received: 30/04/2010
Respondent: Mr K W Randall
Agree that the open spaces proposed should be safeguarded.
Various questions and comments received.
For further details see paper copy.