Option KES1

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 19528

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: Squiers/Croll Group

Agent: Andrew Martin Associates

Representation Summary:

Option KES1

This is the least favourable of the three options identified by the Council. As identified in the supporting text, the access to the school would be concentrated along Oxford Road, which is already very narrow and the extension to the school would be located some distance away from the new school buildings.

Full text:

Option KES1

This is the least favourable of the three options identified by the Council. As identified in the supporting text, the access to the school would be concentrated along Oxford Road, which is already very narrow and the extension to the school would be located some distance away from the new school buildings.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 21705

Received: 28/04/2010

Respondent: Aber Ltd

Agent: Colliers International

Representation Summary:

In order to facilitate the residential units proposed for Ashingdon, it is important that 3 ha of land is made available for the expansion of King Edmund School, in order to accommodate the additional children generated by the new housing.

This option would be located at the eastern end of Oxford Road, away from the existing main school buildings and due to the distance would appear as a separate campus, and would result in additional noise and disturbance as the students travel between the buildings.

This option would involve the development extending further east into the surrounding countryside that the residential areas to the north and south, resulting in urban sprawl, and would not create defensible boundaries, contrary to PPG2. In addition, this option would also conflict with the proposed housing option (SEA2) proposed for South East Ashingdon.

The preferred option is KES3 as this would ensure that the expansion to the school is close to the main school buildings, adjacent to existing residential (to the west), follow an existing field boundary and would enable access from Brays Lane.

Full text:

In order to facilitate the residential units proposed for Ashingdon, it is important that 3 ha of land is made available for the expansion of King Edmund School, in order to accommodate the additional children generated by the new housing.

This option would be located at the eastern end of Oxford Road, away from the existing main school buildings and due to the distance would appear as a separate campus, and would result in additional noise and disturbance as the students travel between the buildings.

This option would involve the development extending further east into the surrounding countryside that the residential areas to the north and south, resulting in urban sprawl, and would not create defensible boundaries, contrary to PPG2. In addition, this option would also conflict with the proposed housing option (SEA2) proposed for South East Ashingdon.

The preferred option is KES3 as this would ensure that the expansion to the school is close to the main school buildings, adjacent to existing residential (to the west), follow an existing field boundary and would enable access from Brays Lane.

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 23948

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Mrs Kerry Graves

Representation Summary:

Objection and comments to the housing in East Ashingdon.
See paper copy for details.

Full text:

Objection and comments to the housing in East Ashingdon.
See paper copy for details.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 24352

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Mr J W Graves

Representation Summary:

I support this option.

Ideal for extra 2 football pitches.

For further information, see paper copy

Full text:

Comments regarding land allocation for East Ashingdon.

For further information, see paper copy.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 24875

Received: 04/05/2010

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Byford

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

This option KES1 - regarding access enhancements and expansion of the King Edmund School site (KES1) would accommodate the 2 football/sports pitches and could also provide safer pedestrian access along Oxford Road, rather than along busy Brays Lane.

Full text:

Comments received regarding option EA1, EA2, EA3 and KES1.

For further details see paper copy.