WH - Should a mix of these sites be considered?
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17331
Received: 20/03/2010
Respondent: Mr Ron Sadler
No, only WH2 offers development without impacting on Greenbelt / agricultural land.
No, only WH2 offers development without impacting on Greenbelt / agricultural land.
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17929
Received: 13/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Paul Sealey
Options WH1, WH3 and WH4 should not be considered because of access problems and risk of development 'creep' noted above. A reduced version of WH5 to resolve access problems of WH2 could be considered.
Options WH1, WH3 and WH4 should not be considered because of access problems and risk of development 'creep' noted above. A reduced version of WH5 to resolve access problems of WH2 could be considered.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18383
Received: 25/04/2010
Respondent: Mr Neil Stone
No, I object for the reasons already given. Green belt land is sacrosanct!
No, I object for the reasons already given. Green belt land is sacrosanct!
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19572
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Tara Gilmore
NO! If infrastructure can be adequately resolved then wh2 is the best place for these houses.
NO! If infrastructure can be adequately resolved then wh2 is the best place for these houses.