WH - Should a mix of these sites be considered?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17331

Received: 20/03/2010

Respondent: Mr Ron Sadler

Representation Summary:

No, only WH2 offers development without impacting on Greenbelt / agricultural land.

Full text:

No, only WH2 offers development without impacting on Greenbelt / agricultural land.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17929

Received: 13/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Paul Sealey

Representation Summary:

Options WH1, WH3 and WH4 should not be considered because of access problems and risk of development 'creep' noted above. A reduced version of WH5 to resolve access problems of WH2 could be considered.

Full text:

Options WH1, WH3 and WH4 should not be considered because of access problems and risk of development 'creep' noted above. A reduced version of WH5 to resolve access problems of WH2 could be considered.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 18383

Received: 25/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Neil Stone

Representation Summary:

No, I object for the reasons already given. Green belt land is sacrosanct!

Full text:

No, I object for the reasons already given. Green belt land is sacrosanct!

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 19572

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: Mrs Tara Gilmore

Representation Summary:

NO! If infrastructure can be adequately resolved then wh2 is the best place for these houses.

Full text:

NO! If infrastructure can be adequately resolved then wh2 is the best place for these houses.