Eldon Way/Foundry Industrial Estate

Showing comments and forms 1 to 17 of 17

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17359

Received: 20/03/2010

Respondent: Mr Ron Sadler

Representation Summary:

I support the Hockley Area Action Plan's option to redevelop this area as a residential and commercial dwellings. If acceptable and suitable relocation of existing local businesses can be accommodated, then this option should be considered. The environmental impact of the relocation of the local work force must be of prime concern.

Full text:

I support the Hockley Area Action Plan's option to redevelop this area as a residential and commercial dwellings. If acceptable and suitable relocation of existing local businesses can be accommodated, then this option should be considered. The environmental impact of the relocation of the local work force must be of prime concern.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17448

Received: 22/03/2010

Respondent: Mr David Dare

Representation Summary:

My Objection to this site have been made in detail in the HAAP comments to RDC

Full text:

My Objection to this site have been made in detail in the HAAP comments to RDC

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17475

Received: 22/03/2010

Respondent: Mr Russell Payne

Representation Summary:

Much better to build on brown field sites with less impact on the area and also improves the envirnment of the area, replacing old industrial buildings with housing. There are sufficient vacant industrial units available throughout Rochford for busines's to relocate.

Full text:

Much better to build on brown field sites with less impact on the area and also improves the envirnment of the area, replacing old industrial buildings with housing. There are sufficient vacant industrial units available throughout Rochford for busines's to relocate.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17767

Received: 06/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Terry Waine

Representation Summary:

Eldon Way is becoming the leisure centre of Hockley district (CJ's, Cullys', Monkey Bizziness and the new Youth Centre) and this trend should be expanded. The leisure part of Eldon Way should be allocated for 'Leisure Use'. There are large businesses e.g. Ironmongery Direct, Belmar Engineering etc. and compensating them for relocation costs (including loss of profits) will be expensive. It is understood that CPO's will not be used. Why were the flat developments not continued into the Factory Industrial Estate? Instead an unrented part completed office block was built.

Full text:

Eldon Way is becoming the leisure centre of Hockley district (CJ's, Cullys', Monkey Bizziness and the new Youth Centre) and this trend should be expanded. The leisure part of Eldon Way should be allocated for 'Leisure Use'. There are large businesses e.g. Ironmongery Direct, Belmar Engineering etc. and compensating them for relocation costs (including loss of profits) will be expensive. It is understood that CPO's will not be used. Why were the flat developments not continued into the Factory Industrial Estate? Instead an unrented part completed office block was built.

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17859

Received: 12/04/2010

Respondent: Ms Jean Townsend

Representation Summary:

This is a good site for improving the centre of Hockley. Existing pavement area is generous in Spa Road which can therefore be widened. It is not clear however whether traffic will flow freely along Greensward/Main Road.

Full text:

This is a good site for improving the centre of Hockley. Existing pavement area is generous in Spa Road which can therefore be widened. It is not clear however whether traffic will flow freely along Greensward/Main Road.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17873

Received: 24/03/2010

Respondent: Miss A Guise, LGSM, LLAM

Representation Summary:

Already we are fully developed so far as residential properties are concerned and do not see the need for building yet more properties for residences, businesses etc. We need the few open spaces left. The Eldon Way Industrial Estate houses a realistic number of various businesses, which caters for some employment and the number of shops closing indicates that rates mitigate against more. The Post Offices are all vital to the community. Car parking is restricted everywhere, unfortunately we need the few buses remaining in the area. The railway station car park is crammed and very expensive, hence passengers from farther afield parking in nearby roads. It seems the Council cannot afford to maintain our roads from the lack of proper cleaning and surfacing. Police are needed to patrol our residential areas as young people in schools and on bikes are totally irresponsible today. Our main roads are a constant hazard for drivers.

Full text:

Thank you for the official letter of 17 March about plans for development in our area. Is it really necessary?

Already we are fully developed so far as residential properties are concerned and do not see the need for building yet more properties for residences, businesses etc. We need the few open spaces left. The Eldon Way Industrial Estate houses a realistic number of various businesses, which caters for some employment and the number of shops closing indicates that rates mitigate against more. The Post Offices are all vital to the community. Car parking is restricted everywhere, unfortunately we need the few buses remaining in the area. The railway station car park is crammed and very expensive, hence passengers from farther afield parking in nearby roads. It seems the Council cannot afford to maintain our roads from the lack of proper cleaning and surfacing. Police are needed to patrol our residential areas as young people in schools and on bikes are totally irresponsible today. Our main roads are a constant hazard for drivers.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17985

Received: 14/04/2010

Respondent: Barratt Eastern Counties

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

The Eldon Way Estate is in multiple ownerships and is nearly fully occupied with over 50 units. It is the most sustainable existing employment site being on a rail route and bus routes. It is within walking distance of surrounding residential. PPS4 now indicates that such sites should not be developed, especially if occupied. Other policy advice is that extension to town centres is considered against a certain mix of uses - residential is not a component of that mix in PPS4.

Full text:

PPS4: Planning for Sustainable Economic Growth

This document was published in December 2009 and is material to the extent that it is likely to alter the extent to which RDC can rely on redeveloping its existing employment sites for alternate uses as set out in the SCS. In this context making the most efficient and effective use of sites within the Green Belt is important and justifies the need to plan flexibly by allowing scope for additional housing on identified Green Belt sites.

The Government's objectives are for sustainable economic growth (paragraph 9). The bullet points at paragraph 10 then explain that reducing the need to travel by car is a component of this objective. The policy encourages economic growth and redevelopment of town centre uses providing these are within existing centres. The advice of what constitutes an appropriate town centre use is given at paragraph 7 of this PPS. Whilst I note that the current Submission Core Strategy envisages a significant amount of residential development as part of the regeneration initiatives for Eldon Way Industrial Estate adjacent to Hockley Town Centre, the publication of this PPS means that the reliance on this as a source of housing land is not sound.

Policy EC2 of PPS4 provides direct policy advice on planning for sustainable economic growth. Criterion a) seeks a positive approach through identifying priority areas where there is deprivation and where regeneration is urgently required. This is not the case with the Eldon Way Industrial area. Criterion b) seeks support for existing business sectors and planning for their expansion and contraction. Eldon Way Industrial area is well used with nearly all of the 50 plus units in occupation. A strategy for their removal would be at odds with PPS4. In the case of Eldon Way Industrial area, the existing sustainable location next to the railway station makes it a highly suitable employment site where retained employment uses should continue. Criterion i) only encourages alternative uses if it is on vacant or derelict buildings. This is not the case at the Eldon Way site, Rawreth Lane or part of the Star Lane estate at Great Wakering.

Policy EC3 sets out a series of policy statements about how centres should be planned. This policy is controlled by paragraph 7 of PPS4. In this context it is clear that significant introductions of residential uses into a town centre are not supported by Government. Indeed this town centre policy also applies to extensions to town centres (EC3.1(bii)), paragraph 7 also controls the type of uses that would form an extension to town centres. The Council's strategy for the Eldon Way Industrial Estate adjacent to Hockley Town Centre, requires further testing.

Eldon Way/Foundry Estate page 61: This is known as the Hockley Trading Estate and contains over 50 units most of which are occupied. The Hockley Area Action Plan Issues and Options Paper consults on options of between 114 dwellings and 209 dwellings.

The appellant has lodged objections to the Submission Core Strategy and the Hockley Area Action Plan. Not to the principle of regeneration but to the balance between new housing and other appropriate uses such as retail, leisure and employment development. In view of the recent publication of PPS4 and Policy EC3 to EC4 of PPS4, I conclude that the identified level of housing is likely to be much less than the Council anticipate.

The Eldon Way Industrial Estate is strategically well placed. It is the only major employment area in Hockley. The employment area is adjacent to the railway station and located a short distance from the main bus routes that run along Spa Road. Some of the residential areas of the town are also within walking distance of this commercial area, thus providing a potential for sustainable travel by employees. The Eldon Way Industrial Estate is therefore right at the heart of the settlement of Hockley/Hawkwell and provides an opportunity to meet sustainable transport objectives by reducing the need to travel by car. Consequently, this employment area is a premier employment site in sustainability terms, both in the context of PPG13 and PPS4.

Whilst it is acknowledged that improvement to the Eldon Way Industrial Estate can and should take place, the extent to which the mix of employment uses should be altered in favour of alternative land uses does require careful consideration. It is considered that a mix of existing or indeed new employment land uses with some Town Centre type uses should dominate the Eldon Way site and that more housing on the identified housing sites is necessary.

In the Hockley Area Action Plan RDC says that the existing uses on this site are harmful to amenity. However, the site has operated for many years without any significant issues and if renewal for B1 type uses are encouraged then the employment area can be maintained without harm to amenity. Renewal of the employment stock can help develop and improve trade, improve the sustainability of businesses as a whole and make for a more flexible labour market as skill levels are varied. This is one of the key messages promoted by Policy EC3 and EC4 of PPS4. A singularly different use altogether or a development dominated by residential would undermine the long term sustainability of the area and Town Centre.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17988

Received: 14/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Gary Buck

Representation Summary:

I have very serious reservations that the local infastructure even if modified would cope with housing on this ste.

Full text:

I have very serious reservations that the local infastructure even if modified would cope with housing on this ste.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 18252

Received: 21/04/2010

Respondent: Mrs Sandrina De Jonge

Representation Summary:

The road network around Hockley is already overloaded. To add residential houses to the area near the centre of town will result in more problems for the current residents. In addition, it will make the town centre far busier and therefore lose its village charm.

Full text:

The road network around Hockley is already overloaded. To add residential houses to the area near the centre of town will result in more problems for the current residents. In addition, it will make the town centre far busier and therefore lose its village charm.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 19090

Received: 28/04/2010

Respondent: Mr David Hopper

Representation Summary:

Insufficient infrastructure

Full text:

Insufficient infrastructure

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 19257

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Jury

Representation Summary:

The existing employment site is in multiple ownerships and has a high occupancy level. Whilst it is undoubtedly the most sustainable employment location and is within an easy walking distance of the town centre and railway station, it is a well established employment location. PPS4 supports the safeguarding of land from other uses such as residential at a local level. The loss of long-term employment uses in this location would undermine wider sustainability objectives, and the role of the Town Centre.

Full text:

The existing employment site is in multiple ownerships and has a high occupancy level. Whilst it is undoubtedly the most sustainable employment location and is within an easy walking distance of the town centre and railway station, it is a well established employment location. PPS4 supports the safeguarding of land from other uses such as residential at a local level. The loss of long-term employment uses in this location would undermine wider sustainability objectives, and the role of the Town Centre.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 19646

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Des Day

Representation Summary:

I strongly object,Having lived in Hockley for forty years the thought of having travellers here sickens me and the local council should be ashamed of themselves.

Full text:

I strongly object,Having lived in Hockley for forty years the thought of having travellers here sickens me and the local council should be ashamed of themselves.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 19952

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Consideration will have to be given to any potential contamination issues that might arise out of this sites previous use as an industrial estate.

Please see our general comments.

Full text:

Consideration will have to be given to any potential contamination issues that might arise out of this sites previous use as an industrial estate.

Please see our general comments.

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 21687

Received: 28/04/2010

Respondent: Aber Ltd

Agent: Colliers International

Representation Summary:

This site has good access to the road network, and is well located with regards the train station.

This site has the opportunity to be redeveloped for a mixed use commercial scheme, including both employment and community and leisure uses appropriate to a town centre location, in accordance with the provisions of PPS1 and PPS4.

Full text:

This site has good access to the road network, and is well located with regards the train station.

This site has the opportunity to be redeveloped for a mixed use commercial scheme, including both employment and community and leisure uses appropriate to a town centre location, in accordance with the provisions of PPS1 and PPS4.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 22629

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

Overall RAG rating - Capacity available to serve the proposed growth

Full text:

RE: ALLOCATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENTS



Thank you for giving Anglian Water the opportunity to comment on the above document.



Please find our comments summarized on the attached document.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 24915

Received: 12/07/2010

Respondent: Mr R Ager

Representation Summary:

Hockley - object to Core Strategy residental land allocations - object West Hockley 50 dwellings, object to E10, GT4/5 - comment on TC7/10 /16 - see full rep for further details.

Full text:

Hockley - object to Core Strategy residental land allocations - object West Hockley 50 dwellings, object to E10, GT4/5 - comment on TC7/10 /16 - see full rep for further details.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 25327

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Weir

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Eldon Way must be retained for local employment and leisure uses. The foundry site could be released for housing given it is next to flats either side of Station Approach therefore a natural extension.

Full text:

Suggest a new development in West Rayleigh to accommodate Rochford's housing allocation should be provided in a new village to take advantage from the highway network of A127, A130 and A1245 where all the infrastructure can be provided in a phased manner without compromising existing settlements.

Various comments received, for further details see paper copy.