EA - Should development be on one site or a selection of sites
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17342
Received: 20/03/2010
Respondent: Mr Ron Sadler
Only sites with existing industrial usage should be considered for residential development.
Only sites with existing industrial usage should be considered for residential development.
Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 17678
Received: 01/04/2010
Respondent: Ms Jean Townsend
A selection might be better. A variety of sites might prevent any one builder becoming large and overwheening locally and nationally.
A selection might be better. A variety of sites might prevent any one builder becoming large and overwheening locally and nationally.
Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19500
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: MR STEVE MAY
I am totally appalled by Rochford Councils inability to communicate with the existing Community on the plans to develop our area. To be totally transparent, open & honest with your clients - the Council Tax payers, you should ensure that everyone has the opportunity to understand these proposals before it is a 'fait accompli'. Ashingdon is currently a reasonably nice green place to live so keep the green belt, we must fulfil the needs of local people with minimum impact on their lives, & not just the needs of the development companies who are not a part of this community
I am totally appalled by Rochford Councils inability to communicate with the existing Community on the plans to develop our area. To be totally transparent, open & honest with your clients - the Council Tax payers, you should ensure that everyone has the opportunity to understand these proposals before it is a 'fait accompli'. Ashingdon is currently a reasonably nice green place to live so keep the green belt, we must fulfil the needs of local people with minimum impact on their lives, & not just the needs of the development companies who are not a part of this community
Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19519
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: Squiers/Croll Group
Agent: Andrew Martin Associates
We propose that development should be located to the north and south of Brays Lane in accordance with our Option EA4.
We propose that development should be located to the north and south of Brays Lane in accordance with our Option EA4.