WH - Would it be better to locate the 50 dwellings on one of these sites or spread the dwellings between a selection of sites?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 8 of 8

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17332

Received: 20/03/2010

Respondent: Mr Ron Sadler

Representation Summary:

No, only WH2 offers development with no impact on greenbelt / agricultural land.

Full text:

No, only WH2 offers development with no impact on greenbelt / agricultural land.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17466

Received: 22/03/2010

Respondent: Mr Russell Payne

Representation Summary:

Should keep developement in the least number of sites possible to reduce over developement, disruption and conjestion within towns and villages.

Full text:

Should keep developement in the least number of sites possible to reduce over developement, disruption and conjestion within towns and villages.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17674

Received: 01/04/2010

Respondent: Ms Jean Townsend

Representation Summary:

Local residents might prefer a spread of building, even thought this might be more disruptive.

Full text:

Local residents might prefer a spread of building, even thought this might be more disruptive.

Support

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 18235

Received: 21/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Kelvin White

Representation Summary:

yes, it would be better if other brown field sites can be found. so spreading them around might limit impact on any one given area

Full text:

yes, it would be better if other brown field sites can be found. so spreading them around might limit impact on any one given area

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 18384

Received: 25/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Neil Stone

Representation Summary:

As I have mentioned development should only be on areas that already have housing ie houses built on them. 1 house could be knocked down and 2 or 3 replace them.

Full text:

As I have mentioned development should only be on areas that already have housing ie houses built on them. 1 house could be knocked down and 2 or 3 replace them.

Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 19573

Received: 29/04/2010

Respondent: Mrs Tara Gilmore

Representation Summary:

Sounds ok when you put it like that, but that just means that you propose to dig up smaller areas of open countryside all over the place. Stick to brownfield sites.

Full text:

Sounds ok when you put it like that, but that just means that you propose to dig up smaller areas of open countryside all over the place. Stick to brownfield sites.

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 19860

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Trevor Turrington

Representation Summary:

The dwellings should spread over a selection of sites and not concentrated in this small area

Full text:

The dwellings should spread over a selection of sites and not concentrated in this small area

Comment

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 19874

Received: 30/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Mark Atkinson

Representation Summary:

Development should be limited to brownfield sites, and not extended to greenfield . It May be worth considering consolidating the smaller "industrial" areas into Eldon way,

Full text:

Development should be limited to brownfield sites, and not extended to greenfield . It May be worth considering consolidating the smaller "industrial" areas into Eldon way,