3.1
Object
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 15716
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Kieran Kelly
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
This vacuous statement is at odds with the Council's continued support for the expansion of Southend Airport despite the serious detrimental impact this will have on the quality of life for all people in the area. Similarly, the only opportunities likely to be created with this vision will be for the numerous property developers engaged to deliver this flawed approach for uncontrolled residential development within the district without any real concern for the availability of supporting infrastructure and services.
This vacuous statement is at odds with the Council's continued support for the expansion of Southend Airport despite the serious detrimental impact this will have on the quality of life for all people in the area. Similarly, the only opportunities likely to be created with this vision will be for the numerous property developers engaged to deliver this flawed approach for uncontrolled residential development within the district without any real concern for the availability of supporting infrastructure and services.
Object
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 16003
Received: 28/10/2009
Respondent: Mr H Snell
Agent: Capita Symonds
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The document lacks a coherent and comprehensive Spatial Vision and set of objectives for the District and how it will evolve to 2025/6, which in turn should be articulated by a coherent Spatial Strategy. By creating topic based visions and objectives the document is not a spatial plan and as such it is unclear how communities such as Hockley will develop as sustainable communities over the plan period. The plan is unsound as its approach is inconsistent with national policy in PPS12 and as such will be not effective in securing the plan's objectives.
The document lacks a coherent and comprehensive Spatial Vision and set of objectives for the District and how it will evolve to 2025/6, which in turn should be articulated by a coherent Spatial Strategy. By creating topic based visions and objectives the document is not a spatial plan and as such it is unclear how communities such as Hockley will develop as sustainable communities over the plan period. The plan is unsound as its approach is inconsistent with national policy in PPS12 and as such will be not effective in securing the plan's objectives.
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 16867
Received: 02/11/2009
Respondent: Knight Developments
Agent: Strutt & Parker
See accompanying Strutt & Parker Planning Document and Cannon Consulting Initial Highways Access and Accessibility Statement.
(Council ref AE27 and AE27a)
See accompanying Strutt & Parker Planning Document and Cannon Consulting Initial Highways Access and Accessibility Statement.
(Council ref AE27 and AE27a)
Representation submitted in relation to proposed allocation of housing to the south west of Rayleigh and attendance required at examination to support the allocation of this site which is not in the submission document (see other responses to core strategy).
Support
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 16898
Received: 02/11/2009
Respondent: Southern and Regional Developments Ltd
Agent: Strutt & Parker
See accompanying Strutt and Parker Planning Document, Cannon Consulting Transport Assessment and Flood Risk, Drainage and Services Report.
Council ref AE29, AE29a and AE29b.
See accompanying Strutt and Parker Planning Document, Cannon Consulting Transport Assessment and Flood Risk, Drainage and Services Report.
Council ref AE29, AE29a and AE29b.
Representation submitted in relation to proposed allocation of housing to the south west of Hullbridge. Attendance at examination to support this allocation.