Opposing proposed building plot CFS023
The impact alone of laying utilities in particular water (No 8) will cause the most amount of disruption and headaches for all residents concerned.
The impact and pressure it would put on the already stretched resources for schooling, doctors and such like.

By RDC list of impacts you can see the predicted building plot CFS023 is no way viable, with no strategic road access and no infrastructure to accommodate the amount of traffic it would generate. The plants and wildlife it would disturb and the damage would be phenomenal.
The proposed building plot CFS023 is boarding on the exact green belt territory.

1- Green Belt Harm -1 - Red
2- Potential Plan Strategy Option 2 - Orange
3- Landscape Impact – 2 - Orange
4- Impact on Ancient Woodland -1- Red
5- Impact on Local Habitats -2 – Orange
6- Impact on Protected Trees -2 - Orange
7- Impact on Agricultural Land -1 Red
8- Proximity to Water Apparatus -2 - Orange
9- Access to bus services -2- Orange
10- Distance to strategic road network 1 – Red
11- Access to employment site – 2 – Orange
12- Critical Drainage Risk - 2 – Orange
13- Impact on Archaeology – 3 Yellow
14 - Impact on Built Heritage – 3- Yellow

https://ts2.opus4.co.uk/wms?SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&VERSION=1.1.1&LAYERS=boundary%3A150&STYLES=&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&TRANSPARENT=true&HEIGHT=256&WIDTH=256&CONTINUOUSWORLD=true&SRS=EPSG%3A27700&BBOX=584764.1297478802,193717.22825533897,584877.0185765213,193830.11708332412

I therefore totally and utterly oppose this proposed building plot CFS023.

Dear Sir op Madam,

Further to the meeting on Monday the 16th of August at the Old fire station regarding proposed building plot CFS023 and COL38.
I have already sent an email regarding plot CFS023.
I am now adding to that email with opposing proposed plot COL38 on the same grounds please see copy below.

Neither of these plots CFS023 or COL38 can go ahead, maximum damaged to all concerned with no benefit.
There is absolutely NO INFRASTRUCTURE from the A127 or A13 to in and out of Rayleigh and Hockley and RDC have not even taken this into consideration when submitting building plot plans.
At this present second in time it is hard enough getting in and out of Hockley and Rayleigh due to the staggering amount building already going on.

I Sophia Michael am opposing the predicted building plot number CFS023 and COL38 due to the following reasons:

The disruption and impact it would have on the local environment would be immense, to achieve minimal housing with the maximum harm and effect to the surroundings areas.

The impact alone of laying utilities in particular water will cause the most amount of disruption and headaches for all residents concerned.

By RDC list of impacts you can see the predicted building plot CFS023 is no way viable, with no strategic road access and no infrastructure to accommodate the amount of traffic it would generate. The wildlife it would disturb and damage and is on the exact boarder of green belt territory.

1- Green Belt Harm -1 - Red
2- Potential Plan Strategy Option- 2 - Orange
3- Landscape Impact – 2 - Orange
4- Impact on Ancient Woodland -1- Red
5- Impact on Local Habitats -2 – Orange
6- Impact on Protected Trees -2 - Orange
7- Impact on Agricultural Land -1 Red
8- Proximity to Water Apparatus -2 - Orange
9- Access to bus services -2- Orange
10- Distance to strategic road network 1 – Red
11- Access to employment site – 2 – Orange
12- Critical Drainage Risk- 2 – Orange
13- Impact on Archaeology – 3 Orange
14 - Impact on Built Heritage – 3- Orange

https://ts2.opus4.co.uk/wms?SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&VERSION=1.1.1&LAYERS=boundary%3A150&STYLES=&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&TRANSPARENT=true&HEIGHT=256&WIDTH=256&CONTINUOUSWORLD=true&SRS=EPSG%3A27700&BBOX=584764.1297478802,193717.22825533897,584877.0185765213,193830.11708332412

I therefore totally and utterly oppose this proposed building plot
CFS023 and COL38.
As mentioned at the meeting the outskirts of Rayleigh and Wickford would be a far better option for building where there is no ancient woodland, protected animals etc and the land is preferably for building unlike proposed plots CFS023 and COL38.