Support
Rochford Area Action Plan Submission
Representation ID: 32799
Received: 23/08/2013
Respondent: Mrs J Plaister
1. Firstly I would like to comment on the preparation of this plan. I feel it could be considered unsound in that in general local residents know nothing about its existence. In particular there are shop-keepers in or adjoining the square who knew nothing about it and have not been consulted as they should be. The open evening(s), when the plans were shown, were not widely publicised. I found out by chance.
2. Secondly I would like to comment that the problems at the corner of West Street and south end North Street must be given overriding consideration, to try to avoid the standstills there that frequently happen, to maintain traffic flow. I think figure 11 seeks to alleviate this.
4. I would personally argue for the provision of 2 disabled parking bays in even figure 11.
5. The bus route is very important here and must be able to continue its journeys without the present frequent interruptions which I have raised in my point 2.
6. Traffic flow and the avoidance of congestion around the bus stop area in West Street must be attended to. I think the wider road space in this area proposed in figure 11 is therefore constructive and vital to allow traffic to flow more effectively.
7. On the whole therefore, I feel the plans in figure 11 come closest to meeting the present needs surrounding the market square, with perhaps a 2nd disabled parking bay.
1. Firstly I would like to comment on the preparation of this plan. I feel it could be considered unsound in that in general local residents know nothing about its existence. In particular there are shop-keepers in or adjoining the square who knew nothing about it and have not been consulted as they should be. The open evening(s), when the plans were shown, were not widely publicised. I found out by chance.
2. Secondly I would like to comment that the problems at the corner of West Street and south end North Street must be given overriding consideration, to try to avoid the standstills there that frequently happen, to maintain traffic flow. I think figure 11 seeks to alleviate this.
3. I personally object to the plan in figure 12, believing among other things that it does not give enough consideration to the needs of elderly/disabled people etc.
I believe that some of the shops/establishments rely on people being dropped off and picked up at least. Some taxis are essential. Flowing traffic is also important. Many of the clients/customers of some establishments are elderly, not very mobile, and rely on these facilities. Pedestrian only is not the answer. I think provision for disabled parking bays too has to be made and figure 12 does not appear to do this. Without these special bays, some people would not be able to access and support the shops etc.
4. I would personally argue for the provision of 2 disabled parking bays in even figure 11.
5. The bus route is very important here and must be able to continue its journeys without the present frequent interruptions which I have raised in my point 2.
6. Traffic flow and the avoidance of congestion around the bus stop area in West Street must be attended to. I think the wider road space in this area proposed in figure 11 is therefore constructive and vital to allow traffic to flow more effectively.
7. On the whole therefore, I feel the plans in figure 11 come closest to meeting the present needs surrounding the market square, with perhaps a 2nd disabled parking bay.