1. Development is detrimental to the current Community
The Site is not properly integrated with the existing village of Hullbridge. A "green buffer" is to exists " in perpetuity between new and existing developments".
The 3.6 hectares of natural green space will only be directly accessible from the new development.
This development as proposed, as evidenced above, will not promote community cohesion but will in fact be creating a separate village to Hullbridge destroying the current community feeling that exists.

2 Highways
Although mention of limited highway improvements is in the report no detail is given as there is no core strategy transport assessment from the Essex County Council or elsewhere. The only Transport Impact assessment required will be developer funded and related only to SER6, without taking account either highway issues or other developments (eg SER1) elsewhere in the district. No assessment of road improvements required has been made and Ferry Road, onto which most traffic will go, has not been mentioned in the report.
At present Rawerth Lane is at, or near, capacity and when Watery Lane is closed, a common occurrence, traffic backs up along Downhall Road and Rawreth Lane towards Rayleigh and Hullbridge Road and Lower Road towards Hockley and Rochford making Journeys to or from Rayleigh or Chelmsford difficult.

No Impact on the District has been made with regard to the Fairglen Interchange (A127/A130/A1245) which lies just outside the District but which has a profound knock on effect when flooded with cars moving to either London Road or Rawreth Lane, too roads affected by SER6 and also, more directly SER1.

It is stated that Highway improvements should be made to accompany the development of the site, this will be to late as improvements must be made first given the current state of the highway network.

3 Sewage/Drainage.
The sewage system within Hullbridge is already at or near capacity. Although mentioned in the report no assessment of need has been made.
Part of the area proposed is prone to flooding. It is not shown as flood risk however as it is farmland and no claims have been made against insurance. Flood risk is based on insurance claims made.

4 Rawerth
Approximately one third or around 6.2 hectares, of development SER6 (the second phase) will be in Rawreth, not Hullbridge. This also relates to points above about community cohesion.
If the residents of the housing in SER6b live in Rawreth they will not be a part of hullbridge, they will be represented by Rawreth Parish council and Downhall and Rawreth District Councillors. They will pay a parish precept to Rawreth but get the facilities of hullbridge. Such a separation will again not foster Community Cohesion and does more to encourage the new development as a separate community.

5 Youth
Hullbridge has a Youth Centre which is currently underused; additional investment should be made to facilities there or at the skate park in the recreation ground rather than have additional facilities which will be underutilised.

6 Neighbourhood Shops

The suggestion that additional neighbourhood shops are required suggests a proper review has not been done of A1 use in Hullbridge, which then gives a concern about the report as a whole. With a population of around 7,300 Hullbridge has three (3) supermarkets; The Co-op, One Stop (Owned by Tesco) and Budgens as well as a number of other independent shops including a Butchers and a Greengrocer etc. Hullbridge is more than adequately served by Shops.
Hullbridge is short of other business premises such as office or studio facilities and banking.