Object

Allocations Submission Document

Representation ID: 28336

Received: 29/11/2012

Respondent: Mrs F M Adams

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Insufficient extra car parking provided for a retail unit of the size indicated - especially if combined with station parking.
Traffic improvement proposals unlikely to unlikely to help the situation. If only B1013 given slip lanes then Spa Road traffic will suffer badly - and that would bear the traffic to the new development. A raised area for pedestrians will only worsen traffic delays. Not room for widening pavements in Spa Road and extra slip lanes. Development will bring in extra traffic that the area cannot cope with.'Evening economy' likely to cause problems antisocial behaviour similar to Rayleigh.

Full text:

Insufficient extra car parking provided for a retail unit of the size indicated - especially if combined with station parking.
Traffic improvement proposals unlikely to unlikely to help the situation. If only B1013 given slip lanes then Spa Road traffic will suffer badly - and that would bear the traffic to the new development. A raised area for pedestrians will only worsen traffic delays. Not room for widening pavements in Spa Road and extra slip lanes. Development will bring in extra traffic that the area cannot cope with.'Evening economy' likely to cause problems antisocial behaviour similar to Rayleigh.