Comment
Hockley Area Action Plan Options Report
Representation ID: 26543
Received: 27/12/2010
Respondent: Mr Kelvin White
i agree with:
-improvements to fronts of retail units
-use of existing brownfield sites for retail/housing
I disagree with:
-developing eldon way for business use. this should be used for public services/land (e.g. leisure/youth/public gardens) and/or partially used for housing.
-new car park in train station. utterly pointless and will not be used. hockley should not be attracting people from outside-it doesnt currently. the retail areas should be used to RETAIN existing residents not encouraging more traffic and people in. the existing residents of hockley need the services.
i agree with:
-improvements to fronts of retail units
-use of existing brownfield sites for retail/housing
I disagree with:
-developing eldon way for business use. this should be used for public services/land (e.g. leisure/youth/public gardens) and/or partially used for housing.
-new car park in train station. utterly pointless and will not be used. hockley should not be attracting people from outside-it doesnt currently. the retail areas should be used to RETAIN existing residents not encouraging more traffic and people in. the existing residents of hockley need the services.