Object
Rochford Core Strategy Development Plan Document - Schedule of Changes
Representation ID: 26065
Received: 25/10/2010
Respondent: Mr Gary Congram
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Why is it necessary to state Parish specific locations of development in the CS when that is the purpose of the Site Allocations, why not state the area of the district i.e, North, Central etc.,
Stating specifics so far out as 2031 allows for profiteering by land developers, also it is not consistent with the Key Diagram as changes to infrastructure (roads) are not specific.
The evidence base has not been updated to reflect the changes to government policy.
There is no changes to the councils strategy or evidence base to reflect the changes in the countries economy let alone the districts.
Why is it necessary to state Parish specific locations of development in the CS when that is the purpose of the Site Allocations, why not state the area of the district i.e, North, Central etc.,
Stating specifics so far out as 2031 allows for profiteering by land developers, also it is not consistent with the Key Diagram as changes to infrastructure (roads) are not specific.
The evidence base has not been updated to reflect the changes to government policy.
There is no changes to the councils strategy or evidence base to reflect the changes in the countries economy let alone the districts.