Object
Rochford Core Strategy Development Plan Document - Schedule of Changes
Representation ID: 26055
Received: 19/10/2010
Respondent: mrs lisa browne
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
locally the infastrucure is not suffient to cope with the intented addition in new development,s ie housing, the main roads from rayleigh to hullbridge ,hockley, and surrounding area,s are insuffient to handle through traffic at today,s rate , the schooll,s in the surrounding area,s would become over populated, all for change and progression but let,s make sure the ground work,s are suffient to cope and develope then enter into a correct public consultating period and listen to what the public have to say as we are the people to whom these developement plan,s will affect the most,
we object to any development,s within the area, re the village infastructure would not be suffice to such changes, all amenaties can barely offer a satisfactory service to people now, to use the old stick with the carrot, re more investment and amenaties gives a false sence regarding this matter, as you must be only to aware we are in resession, worldwide, and is it not the case that the government say to expand and spend more is clearly not the way forward, cut cut cut well surely this must apply here, there are no fund,s except those who will exploit this for their own financial gain and not be around to see the aftermath. Expand and develope the amenaties firstly school,s to be built,transport both public @ private, hospital,s are the next to be hit by the government cuts school,s have had their redevelopment funding withdrawn, with what funds are the local authoraties going to back these project,s