Comment

Rayleigh Town Centre Area Action Plan - Issues and Options

Representation ID: 25417

Received: 29/01/2010

Respondent: Mr D Harvey

Representation Summary:

Q1. Where is money going to come from to provide these alternatives?

Full text:

Q1. Where is money going to come from to provide these alternatives?

Q2. No. It is too late to restore the heritage of Rayleigh. Most has already been destroyed by existing and passed Councils.

Q3. A permanent footpath along the western side of Websters Way from Eastwood Road to top of High Street.

Q4a. No pedestrianisation of High Street. In most areas these beocme a problem areas after shops have closed. Market to stay in its position. No more unsightly fats etc into its old area.

Q4b. Certainly introduce measures to reduce through traffic in town centre, again existing surrounding areas are affected what would local residents have to put up with ie noise etc.

Q5. No to front improvement scheme - but where redevelopments are planned consult public to what is planned not like so called sports pavillion which is a glorified council office.

Q6. Yes

Q8. No

Q9. None of them - spend money on more important things ie street cleaning, verges etc.

Q10. Option 1

Q11. Option 1

Q12. Option 1

Q13. Option 1

Q14. Part of Option 2. Signal control crossings all pedestrian crossing with guard railings either side.

Q15. Maintain the existing movement.