Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 21167

Received: 25/04/2010

Respondent: Mrs L Corbell

Representation Summary:

I am opposing options E13 E14 E15 E16 and E17. Putting an industrial site on either side of the A129 will cause chaos with more traffic. Lorries turning onto an already busy road. The environment will be affected by the extra lorries and traffic, backing on to a school.

Full text:

I am opposing GT3 on the grounds of extra traffic on the A129 which is bad enough at the best of times. The crime rate will rise. Schools will be Overcrowded. Extra litter. House prices will drop and we wont be able to sell our properties'

I am opposing NLR5 on the grounds of once again the traffic congestion on the A129. Once again the schools will be overcrowded. We have no Facilities on this side pf Rayleigh ie doctors, dentists, vets etc. If we need any of these facilities Rayleigh can be a nightmare to reach with the Amount of traffic already. With the proposed 550 new houses plus there cars travelling will be diabolical.

I am opposing options E13 E14 E15 E16 and E17. Putting an industrial site on either side of the A129 will cause chaos with more traffic. Lorries turning onto an already busy road. The environment will be affected by the extra lorries and traffic, backing on to a school.

I feel that there must be better options for all the proposed proposals ie E18 is well away from our houses and could accommodate the industrial Estate and the gypsies with better access to the A127 and A1245.

I am extremely annoyed that these planning applications were not widely advertised giving the local residents time to digest what the full impact Would be. It seems that this whole thing was so low key that it seems that the council wanted to push these plans through without the local rate Payers knowledge. I in tact only heard about a meeting an hour before it started and that was by word of mouth.