Support
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19605
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Pauline Young
YES - Locations 101 and 102 very well positioned and must be considered together - I note 101 has been rejected as is not located with a preferred location for residential development as set out within the Core Strategy Submission Document' yet just across the railway line is location 102 which will be examined as part of Hockley Area Action Plan. I suggest both sites be considered whether as part of Action plan or not, between them they have much to offer not least their position located in close proximity to Hockley centre. Good access to bus and railway links.
YES - Locations 101 and 102 very well positioned and must be considered together - I note 101 has been rejected as is not located with a preferred location for residential development as set out within the Core Strategy Submission Document' yet just across the railway line is location 102 which will be examined as part of Hockley Area Action Plan. I suggest both sites be considered whether as part of Action plan or not, between them they have much to offer not least their position located in close proximity to Hockley centre. Good access to bus and railway links.