Comment
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 19598
Received: 29/04/2010
Respondent: Mrs Pauline Young
I accept that site Location ref 180 rejected on the grounds 'The site is located within the boundaries of a Special Landscape Area' but cannot understand the rejection 'the site is not located within the Councils preferred locations for development as stated within the Core Strategy Submission Document' when it is just across the road from the proposed locations at Rectory road of SH1,SH2,SH3,SH4. Additionally regarding proximity to local services again factually incorrect to state 'The site is not in proximity to schools' when it is actually closer to schools than the locations proposed at Rectory road of SH1,SH2,SH3,SH4.
I accept that site Location ref 180 rejected on the grounds 'The site is located within the boundaries of a Special Landscape Area' but cannot understand the rejection 'the site is not located within the Councils preferred locations for development as stated within the Core Strategy Submission Document' when it is just across the road from the proposed locations at Rectory road of SH1,SH2,SH3,SH4. Additionally regarding proximity to local services again factually incorrect to state 'The site is not in proximity to schools' when it is actually closer to schools than the locations proposed at Rectory road of SH1,SH2,SH3,SH4.