Object
Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document
Representation ID: 18497
Received: 27/04/2010
Respondent: Mr James C Smith
Strongly object: Proposals E13,14,15,16,17 would all result in significant loss of Green Belt land.
E13,14,15,16,17 all require significant upgrade to existing road network, particularly London Road which is busy throughout the day and nearly at a standstill at rush hour.
E13,14,15,16,17 would significantly change the character of the West of Rayleigh by making industrial units more 'high profile' on main approach to Rayleigh Centre
E13,14,15,16,17 environmental impact of access, heavy lorries, waste, air pollution, clean-up etc.on area close to existing school and housing require careful consideration.
E13,14,15,16,17 would be opposite/alongside proposed residential areas with possible conflict of access to already congested roads.
Strongly object: Proposals E13,14,15,16,17 would all result in significant loss of Green Belt land.
E13,14,15,16,17 all require significant upgrade to existing road network, particularly London Road which is busy throughout the day and nearly at a standstill at rush hour.
E13,14,15,16,17 would significantly change the character of the West of Rayleigh by making industrial units more 'high profile' on main approach to Rayleigh Centre
E13,14,15,16,17 environmental impact of access, heavy lorries, waste, air pollution, clean-up etc.on area close to existing school and housing require careful consideration.
E13,14,15,16,17 would be opposite/alongside proposed residential areas with possible conflict of access to already congested roads.