Object

Allocations DPD Discussion and Consultation Document

Representation ID: 17878

Received: 12/04/2010

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Cooper

Representation Summary:

I don't agree with any of the options put forward because of loss of valuable scarce green belt land to development and all are unsustainable. The additional housing needs of Hawkwell are far less than 175 and could be accommodated on smaller brown field sites. There is just one hourly bus service, no primary or secondary schools with spare capacity within walking distance. Station is a car drive away. With negligible local employment most residents will use cars to get to station or to place of work. If forced to take one option least unacceptable is SH3.

Full text:

I don't agree with any of the options put forward because of loss of valuable scarce green belt land to development and all are unsustainable. The additional housing needs of Hawkwell are far less than 175 and could be accommodated on smaller brown field sites. There is just one hourly bus service, no primary or secondary schools with spare capacity within walking distance. Station is a car drive away. With negligible local employment most residents will use cars to get to station or to place of work. If forced to take one option least unacceptable is SH3.